Is this worth reading /lit/?
It's philosophy, so no.
>should i read outdated philosopher?
When will you plebs get to contemporary stuff that is actually relevant?
Overrated piece of junk. Its role in the history of the philosophical tradition is vastly overstated. Its contributions were in fact nothing groundbreakingly new, much less relevant for its time.
Don't bother.
>>9228453
Yes, but only if you're going to go all the way and read the next two and the best in the series: Critique of Judgement.
>>9228492
wew /lit/, what happened