What are the most villainous names in history?
Names whose mere appearance alone conjures visions of treachery, and evil.
Ivan the Terrible
>treachery
Alcibiades
>>833946
Muhammad.
Why did Mussolini make his HQ look so fucking creepy?
>>833438
Dadaism is a hell of a drug
>>833438
Cause he want it to be discussed in the decades to come.
>>833438
Because to Italians back then used to corruption and inefficiency, a sight like that would be very welcome. Plus the fact that this was before this aesthetic was reappropriated for comic book and movie supervillains, so it wouldn't have carried such connotations.
Were European and Japanese nobles the only cunts autistic about heraldry? Especially Europe (motherfucking Armigery) Seems that other civilizations' nobles did not bother with them.
Like, what about China? Indians? Muslims? Did Rome have heraldry?
>tfw this hangs on wall next to the Jack
>>833251
>Part 1
In China's case, their feudal aristocracy got BTFO when the Empire was established and the meritocratic aristocracy took its place.
That said, when China had feudal nobles prior the Imperial Age, the closest equivalent of a feudal coat of arms would be the character of the name of your state/duchy/march/county
Which makes sense: it's already a logographic Character system. Although State Names were in Seal-Script. That was in Ancient China.
Pic related: the State of Qin. Shit would be on the King's Seal: the primary symbol of state authority. Chinese flags tend to be mere signalling devices.
>>833272
>Part 2
During the Empire, the only heraldic symbol remaining was the Dragon, and was associated with just one guy, the last Chinese nobleman: the Emperor and his ilk.
By the late Imperial Age (1000 AD-1911 AD), it got formalized. The Emperor's dragon is to have five claws. His immediate relatives will have 4 claws, while the res can use 3 claws. Drawing a five clawed dragon for yourself is an act of sedition funnily enough.
This is the reason why non Chinese dragons like Korean/Japanese/Vietnamese/Bhutanese ones never use five fingered dragons. It's like copying the US Flag.
What were the biggest miscalculations or decisions based on fallacies in history in your opinion?
>>832999
Uh, Hannibal thought he could win a war against rome, even though Carthage couldn't pay their mercenaries?
>>832999
>decisions based on fallacies in history
Everyone who read Marx say "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles" and took it to be literal truth and acted on it.
Hitler going to war with both the Allies and Soviet Russia.
If he had picked either of them, chances are the other would have joined him
What are some good 'Nam flicks?
It's really hard to filter out the anti-war propaganda horseshit from most of them, but I guess Platoon.
That one where "It Ain't Me" starts playing.
>>833084
Go back to /tv/
Do you think he got away with it?
>>832803
Ted Cruz has gotten away with too much desu
>>832803
Jew tricks
This is still my favourite gif on Wikipedia
Is it fair to call the Black Panthers a terrorist organization? I've heard black youth claim they don't have a history of violence, at least not of murder. This isn't supposed to be a "we wuz"-tier question, I'm genuinely curious. I don't know where to find documents pertaining to their history. You people seem more capable of answering than /pol/.
>>832739
I dont think the black panthers where very violent, but the bloods and crips have done some horrible shit
The feds really did a number on the black panthers
>>832739
At least historically, yes. The black panther party was a Marxist subversive hate-group comparable to the KKK of the era, and was dismembered appropriately by the dubiously ethical but very effective FBI's Counter Intelligence program.
https://vault.fbi.gov/cointel-pro/cointel-pro-black-extremists
>>832739
>>832752
Didn't panthers almost exclusively attack police though? Do police count as noncombatants? Considering the stuff that was happening at the time, it's kinda hard to say they weren't.
On top of that, hateful as they were, their hatred was completely different form that of the KKK. They aren't just black people in hoods (well, not that kind of hood) tying little white boys to crosses and burning them. In recent history the hatred of blacks has been proactive (where white people claim to be superior), wheras the hatred of white people by minorities has been reactive (in response to an atrocity or affront of some sort).
>be me
>study History degree
>Contemporanean history
>spend every fucking class talking bullshit about how the media (owned by an elite) manipulates the masses in order to convince them not to be leftists
>Sociology
>must write an essay on how african tribes have a better life than those who live in a capitalist system since they ain't that obsessed with consumption
If I was 15 I would be in my element.
I know that feel, OP
What exactly is the point of this thread..
>>832682
Blog/humblebrag.
Also OP writing devil advocate's essays is part of life, enjoy the challenge/bullshit.
America's - Manifest Destiny, Empire of Liberty and Frontier Thesis
Germany's - Lebensraum (influenced by Frontier Thesis) and Blut und Eisen
Britain's - White Man's Burden (shared with America)
Japan's -- HakkÅ ichiu and Shinmin no Michi
Italy's -- Spazio vitale ( influenced by Lebensraum), Mare Nostrum and Manifesto della razza
Russia's -- Communist revolution and League of Militant Atheists
France's -- Cult of Reason
If you can think of others let's hear it
I'd say islamic caliphate but that's not a countries concept
the other countries are too dumb for concepts
>>832656
>HakkÅ ichiu
Always found it funny that a Nationalist Japanese Concept utilizes Chinese Imperial Rhetoric.
>>832656
>I'd say islamic caliphate but that's not a countries concept
Jesus, that's easy
>Dar-Al Islam, Dar-Al Harb.
What does /his/ think of Nick Land, University of Warwick's Cybernetic Culture Research Unit, Urbanomics and accelerationism? Is Land the most interesting recent contributor to Continental Philosophy writing in English? Considering a lot of his work is positioned as "theory-fiction", can you even call him a philosopher?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Land
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerationism
>>832564
He's a meme, for sure.
>>832574
Do you mean "meme" in the sense that that word usually has on 4chan, i.e., "popular on the Internet"? Because that doesn't seem to be the case.
>>832564
His reading of Kant is pretty interesting.
I'd say he's more of a journalist than a philosopher as such though.
I've gotten replies to emails to him asking for book recommendations etc, and he's always been gracious and polite.
How long did it take for medieval ironwork to surpass the Roman one?
China had a bunch of innovations that weren't present in the early Middle Ages, for example in the 5th century BCE they already had muh cast iron
9th century Europe for muh Ulfberht swords
13th century for muh full suits of steel
when guys like vikings or arabs started to discover pic related
>>832190
No time at all, the only knowledge actually lost with the fall of the Roman empire was stuff too expensive and large-scale for the smaller successor states to keep doing, like the roman roads.
What is the Shroud of Turin, /his/?
>>832004
A mystery.
False relics was an industry during the crusades.
Any big european cathedral had a splinter of the cross, the head of John the Baptist, Jesus foreskin or whatever
>>832016
Can you explain how the shroud was made?
Was Bruce Ismay wrong for getting on the lifeboat?
I'll share first: I don't think he was wrong for getting on a lifeboat. I think he was wrong for claiming for afterward saying that everything was calm, when multiple eyewitness accounts suggest it was not at this point--that this was a boat where crewmen had to fire warning shots into the air, and passengers were trying to rush the boat in a fit of panic. He was wrong for signing off on the White Star Line policies for charging the families of dead crew members whose bodies were retrieved from the ocean. He was wrong for signing off on the reduction of the lifeboats from 32 to 20 because it made the 'first class deck look cluttered.'
I don't suppose we'll ever know the entire truth, though. Were there really no women or children around, despite 1500+ people still being left on the ship, including hundreds of women and dozens of children? Or was this something created in survivor memories afterward, to help justify their own survival? Did people rush and panic, as some eyewitnesses say, or was there no rush and calm, as Ismay said? After all right after launching this boat, crew members had to form a protective linked arm circle around the next launched boat so that women and children could get through first because of the great crush of people panicking on deck.
hey at least he didnĀ“t crossdressed to get in a boat
>>831954
To be fair, he didn't crossdress to get in the boat. He jumped into the boat along with a group of other men. Officers then arrived with a group of male and female 3rd class passengers and ordered the men out so they could get the women in, then fired shots into the air and warned them since a few weren't moving. All of the men but Buckley started to climb out. From his inquiry:
>I was crying. There was a woman in the boat, and she had thrown her shawl over me, and she told me to stay in there. I believe she was Mrs. Astor. Then they did not see me, and the boat was lowered down into the water, and we rowed away out from the steamer.
>believing in god or anything "spiritual" when it has been proven beyond a doubt that humans have evolved from more primitive life forms by chance, when technology is changing man into something else, and when AI is being improved exponentially
How can anybody justify any primitive religious thought? The only way to keep religion around logically is to alter major teachings; this in turn basically nullifies the religion since it then becomes something new. Explain yourselves, anti-science cucks.
>AI improving exponentially meme
>People still haven't realized that Moore's Law has been dead for many years
>>831674
>le evolution booty bothers you maymay
>le primitive thought maymay
Nope
>>831678
Not that guy, but that's an interesting claim and I'd like to see some validation for it.
Who were the "Original" Europeans?
Stone age hunters
Some nards that followed some migrating animals north and didn't stop when fucking frozen water fell from the sky for half the year. Some were even so fucking stupid they kept going till the sun wouldn't rise for months
>>831363
W-were they white?