Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3915. page

tell me if you want to see more pages from the album aswell

also, sorry for my english :c

>>826681
>Deliberately non-white, gay-ass rainbow Hitlers
>Visual record of gradual hyperinflation from jewsury
>Some boring-ass Nazi actually took up stamp collecting

what the fuck am I reading

WE WUZ: The religion.

Their claims are just as valid as some random Euros and Khazars cosplaying as ancient Israelites.

https://youtu.be/yet2Q0M32GQ

File: Ego Senpai.png (29KB, 432x555px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 432x555px

About what?

Phenomenological non-cognitivism? Objectively, yes. This makes him more logically grounded and sound than almost any other philosopher.

Egoism? Egoism is a spook.

>>826322

A better question is, did Nietzsche read him?

>>826393
duh

Direct Hit 1

You answered "True" to questions 11 and 15, which generated the following response:

Earlier you responded that it is rational to believe the Loch Ness monster does not exist if there is an absence of strong evidence or argument that it does. No strong evidence or argument was required to show that the monster does not exist - absence of evidence or argument was enough. But now you claim that the atheist needs to be able to provide strong arguments or evidence if their belief in the non-existence of God is to be rational rather than a matter of faith.

The contradiction is that on the first occasion (Loch Ness monster) you agreed that the absence of evidence or argument is enough to justify belief in the non-existence of the Loch Ness monster, but on this occasion (God), you do not.

>I believe the standard of evidence for a physical creature should be greater than that of a deity.


You answered "True" to questions 7 and 14, which generated the following response:

You claimed earlier that evolutionary theory is essentially true. However, you have now stated that it is foolish to believe in God without certain, irrevocable proof that She exists. The problem is that there is no certain proof that evolutionary theory is true - even though there is overwhelming evidence that it is true. So it seems that you require certain, irrevocable proof for God's existence, but accept evolutionary theory without certain proof. So you've got to make a choice: (a) Bite the bullet of supposing that a higher standard of proof is required for belief in God than for belief in evolution; or (b) take a direct hit, accepting that this is an area where your beliefs are just in contradiction.

You chose to bite the bullet.

>Evolution has many data points taken from the real world, whereas belief in God (Judeo-Christian) just focuses on the intent of one (real/imaginary) being. Evolution could also be a process initiated by a deity.

Loving this biased test!

Perhaps instead of concerning whether or not a belief is rational, consider that humans are free to find truth in whatever they believe, whether or not it is rational.

So perhaps the Loch Ness Monster does not exist, yet if my religion is a traditional worshipping of his sacred existent in his lake, then his existence is truth whether or not he exists.

And thus when asked whether or not something is true or false, one's definition of true and false are subjective. To me, I think there could be sacred power, but I don't particularly believe in it. To others, maybe they haven't proven it, but it is truth (to them).

Basically this test is just a test of rationality concerning something like religion which is so much deeper than rationality. It's a human experience that can't be labeled true or false.

>>826300
I took a hit so I started over and I made it through with no hits.

2 ez

The latter, I suppose. The "exoskeleton" is a machine, though.

>behaving like a normal

Let's imagine OP making non-retarded threads.

>>826170
Well, I needed to dumb it down, so you can understand the thread.

>>825874
>le black magic rape man
Literally everything he did was wrong.

Wasn't he responsible for Russia joining WWI?

File: Rasputin_near_1914.jpg (78KB, 404x468px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 404x468px

>>822222

File: de-bry-1c-conquistadors_screen.jpg (71KB, 582x483px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 582x483px

Spain went full grindcore

The Infernal Columns in the Véndee were some horror tier shit.

Khmer Rouge

Orthodox NT is the most literal (I'm not just memeing, you can tell because it doesn't translate "presbyter" as "priest", but as "elder", so it's clearly not biased), but there is not Orthodox translation of the OT yet.

NRSV is very good. NKJV and KJV are also very solid. Pretty much any mainstream translation apart from those is terrible, they are either heavily Catholic biased, heavily Protestant biased, or liberal, or some other agenda. I'm not trying to say those don't have agendas, but they are very minimal compared to the rest, and the NRSV definitely is done in good faith.

>>825539
Whoops, correction. RSV is done in good faith. NSRV is complete garbage, do NOT touch it. It uses a very contextual translation which allowed the translators to force their exegesis into the text. RSV is great though.

>>825539
>(I'm not just memeing, you can tell because it doesn't translate "presbyter" as "priest", but as "elder", so it's clearly not biased)
Why isn't this done more often?

File: 1457593558192.jpg (188KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1280x720px

And you have Black Muricans claimed themselves descendant of Pharaohs

File: 1457088872534.jpg (133KB, 1079x1387px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1079x1387px

WE

>Lebanon
that is a holy place in the bible you goof
>Thebes
never heard of it
>Memphis
founded by Andrew Jackson, named because the Mississippi river was the American Nile.

I forgive you, but dont shitpost again, will you?

>>825468
I won't

>>825457
>For the duration of Lent, I, along with probably most of the Orthodox here, will not be posting on 4chan
Post quality will go up it seems

>>825421
>Holy

>German

>Forced Meme

>>825241

Do sieges count?

Leningrad was pretty horrible.

Verdun

>>825209
Are you so mad that North Africans were originally Black that you made this thread to shitpost?

>>825209
WE
WUZ
PHILOSOPHERS
AND
SHIET

>>825209
The Arab Moors like Aristotle so they painted him as their skin color.

This is like saying that Jesus was Chinese because in 13th centuary China they drew him as a Chink.

>not wanting your society to revert back to glorious utopian Year Zero

found the intellectual bourgeoisie cuck

I that Kim Jong Un's dad?

>>825258
No, its Pol Pot

>>825146
Left. Piketty and Smith have little relation with the rest of their teams.

>>825146
Right. By far

>>825424
>>825479

/his/ - Consensuses, always.