Didn't knew where to put this, so here it is.
>>1320387
What do you mean by "for today"?
Dunno, but the worst one is clearly London
Read up on the Chicago School
Jane Jacobs - Death and Life of Great American Cities aka the sidewalk is important.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjEg7tChDrk
Oscar Newman - Defensible Space --> C. Ray Jeffrey: CPTED
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CF_V2S6i30c
Clarke --> situational crime prevention
increase effort + increasing risk + reducing reward = less crime
http://www.popcenter.org/25techniques/
What are the best history books that can give me a description of the "big picture"? A good overview of world history?
Also, what are the essential History Philosophers?
>>1320380
the bible
>>1320380
I think you might need to consider historians are not necessarily philosophers and philosophers are not necessarily historians. We run into problems like this when we think Plato, for example, was discussing a historical atlantis when he was using a fictional bogeyman in an illustration, or if we try to understand some ancient world "meaning of life" through Herodotus. We can learn something "about history" by reading about Aristotle or Pythagorus, but their words, the concepts, were not intended for their day as a history lesson.
>>1320743
When you read philosophy you try to visualize what you read as if you were in the same room with that philosopher and try to see if you can think as he thinks.
When you read history you try to visualize an accurate picture of the events, that's why you ended to read many sources and see where they overlap or where they won't agree with each other and then study more why is that so.
Can someone please explain how anarcho communism works?
>>1320369
Think hippie commune
>>1320369
tldr: Anarcho-socialism is regular socialism but without an authoritarian vanguard party to seize the means of production.
Bakunin predicted that the vanguard would degenerate into a dictatorship of the proletariat, and present an obstacle to the goals of socialism where the "capitalists" are merely trading hands with Party cronies. See: USSR.
It doesn't.
Why did the Greeks only find what we would today call twinks and/or traps attractive, while bara men were considered repulsive?
The pederastic relationship ended when the younger male began to lose his prepubescent and androgynous features, and it was considered inappropriate and disgusting to hold a relationship with another male of the same age or older (despite bara being objectively superior).
Why is it, Anons?
>>1320338
Are you familiar with the Afghani "bacha bazi"? Same idea. Women are cunts and you have to beat them or cover them to keep them in line, so says the scriptures and your ancient cultural standards. However, your bros like Abdul are very cool and not for sexual, because sodomy is haram. So what is a sexually frustrated man to do? Explore the grey area and fuck boypucci, obviously. They don't look like men, so it's not sodomy, but because they have feminine penises they can't be women either, and accordingly are not subject to female religious norms of chasteness and modesty.
>>1320361
Extremely misogynistic cultures will inevitably become homoerotic in this fashion. See also: Nazi Germany, or American gang phenomena of being on the "down low".
>>1320361
But bara men are objectively more attractive, though. Why not simply abolish or ignore the ancient cultural standards?
Why do Slavs have a bad reputation?
Every Slav I've ever met here in Florida has been bro tier. Idk how many other peoples can go through revolutions, wars, ethnic cleansings and communism and still keep it as real as they do. Their girls are gorgeous too. I wouldn't mind banging a Russian broad at all.
>>1320333
>Every Slav is Russian meme
Because they're poor and until recently were under the control of communists. Slavs only have bad reputations on online imageboards where there's too many Wehraboos who hate Russians for destroying their beloved German Reich. M-muh honor is loyalty, my furor!
>>1320333
>Why do Slavs have a bad reputation?
Old stereotypes and gaymanofaggism on the internet.
Nowadays it's mostly being the more straightforward people than average oversocialised mongrel.
Why do people still believe, that knights were stupid and sluggish fighters that swung around 20 lbs of steel?
where did this ridiculous meme come from?
>>1320249
wee-a-boos
>>1320249
It mostly seems to come from 18th and 19th century pseudohistorians, trying to portray themselves as much more enlightened and intelligent than those brutish middle age people.
>>1320249
>does your pommel even half sword
During the years between WW1 and WW2, you see a marked increase in the power of aircraft as military weapons. So it's perhaps inevitable that the air forces* would seek to assert themselves against their departmental rivals in the army and navy and the like.
But if you look at particulars, you see a split, at least between the Anglo-American world and the Germans, which is what I've been reading about lately. Over in England and the U.S., you see an attempt by the air force to distance itself from other branches, insistence that wars can be won through airpower alone, and eschewing roles like being "flying artillery" for the ground troops, or naval bombing, and attempting to push through with strategic bombing initiatives, since that's the way you can theoretically win a war just with airplanes.
Over in Germany, you get the reverse phenomenon, instead of the Air force trying to distance itself from other branches, you see the Luftwaffe trying to assimilate other branches into itself. AA was the province of the Luftwaffe, even when AA guns were often used as AT guns, it was Luftwaffe personnel manning them. Airbase "Security forces" kept expanding and organizing akin to Heer ones, until Herman Goerring had his own panzer division. The defense of Italy was commanded by a Luftwaffe man, and that front saw far more infantry and artillery use out of the Germans than plane use.
Why did England and the U.S. go one way and Germany the other? Does anyone know?
*Yes, I'm aware that in several major powers, most notably the U.S., there was no independent air force command. I'm still using the term for convenience.
Bumping this for interest
>>1320236
It probably has something to do with the structure of the Nazi state, which was far less homogeneous than it looked from the outside. There were various factions within the Nazi state that were competing for power, and Goering's Luftwaffe was one of them.
It's an obvious matter of geography. Germany would be bound to fight wars primarily right across it's borders without the additional necessity or protection of naval forces and transportation over water. This means a war on the ground, so combined arms as a means of backing up infantry and armor is the most important usage of air.
The UK and US were separated from the European mainland (and other theaters) by large or not so large bodies of water, negating a purely ground warfare approach.
What's the most /his/ of video games?
>>1320097
Probably any game from the Grigsby series since they're less games and more realistic army level commander simulators.
>>1320097
Go with the Avalon Hill Civilization, not the Sid Meir one.
>>1320097
paradox games
Why didn't Romans invented hieroglyphs, while China didn't invented letters?
>>1319989
Not all Chinese characters descended from pictographic representations of objects.
>>1319989
Romans near got everything they had as a civilization from the Greeks. I can't think of anything originally theirs.
>>1319989
Are you from a different country?
>arrive in previously uncontacted empire
>get native pussy almost immediately
Why were conquistadores so great with women?
Bitches ain't shit but hoes and tricks, they love nothing more than that conqueror dick.
The natives thought they were gods
Amerindian civilizations were neither isolated from the rest of the world, nor ignorant regarding the origin of the Europeans (they didn't think that they were "gods"; that is ridiculous).
Who was the equivalent figure of this guy in Asia ? Cao Cao ?
>>1319831
Qin Shih Huang.
>>1319898
FPBP
>>1319831
Cao Cao fits best, seized power from the inside and never openly took over, his heir did.
Qin Shi Huang was more like long lived Alexander.
ITT: we tell our love for the glorious father of true philosophy aka mathematic realism aka objective Beauty, Truth, Good, and Justice
plz aristotelician shit GTFO
>>1319761
plato is honestly retarded and awful, please kill yourself
Glory to the monad and his prodigal son, Plato. Truth is indeed objective, and virtue is indeed the luster of a goldened soul, and Beauty is surely the splendor of the Real!
>>1319769
Spotted the appetitive-souled individual.
Will this board ever be able to maturely discuss things like vikings or Wehrmacht or have the fanboys as well as contrarians forever ruined that possibility?
Pic unrelated
>Vikings
Crybabies who project modern morality on medieval people can't do it
>Nazis
A split between 14/88 GAS THE KIKES RACEWAR NOW and whiny American jews exaggerating
No subjects regarding fascism, nazis, Germanic history and eugenics as well as others can never be discussed seriously on this board or anywhere on the internet frankly. Pol is bigger than 4chan now, and has combined It's user base with much of 4chan, stormfront, a large population from Reddit, and various other alternative news and neoconservative websites. Their is no end to their retardation
>>1319711
>it's all those /pol/ meanies fault!!
You leftists sure like acting like victims despite /leftypol/ regularly organising raids of /his/
can music be good, or is that a social construct?
can art be beautiful, or is that a social construct?
Plenty is from my perspective.
Anything that can be understood as a social construct can be taken as a personal understanding.
If you are asking if there is objective beauty or goodness, then I don't think so.
Is rape wrong, or is that a social construct?
Why is free will important to identity? Does pre-determined fate lessen the human condition? If so, why? Is it so bad to experience what is?
Dumb phone poster.
Notice how I didn't link to your post. No YOUs for you smelly phoneposter.
Either way it doesn't matter imo
>1319499
OPs don't get (You)s you fucking newfag