If you were a pedophile, the kind that was attracted to really young children would you castrate yourself?
Wouldn't it be the most morally righteous thing to do in that situation?
>>1319263
Castration shouldn't be necessary if you're able to develop enough self control.
>>1319263
why the fuck would I do that? not going to do that just to avoid thought crimes. I have enough self-control to not fuck kids
>>1319263
I think of beating the shit out of people constantly and while I have self control to count to 10 and not swing on them, I don't think to cut my arms off.
You know, victimizers are victimizers, and I'm not entirely sure every rapist is even sexually interested specifically in the person they victimize. I don't think "all child rapists are pedophiles", I think many are people who want to hurt something inside themselves or something inside someone else, or just to hurt people. I think we will never know to what prevalence exists sexual feelings toward young people because the stigma is so strong, someone would be committing literal social suicide to own up to it.
I've heard vague rumors for years that this word traces back to the Sun God of Egypt: "Amun-Ra" or "Amen-Ra." All Internet sources seem heavily biased one way or another; there doesn't seem to be any reliable objective info...perhaps nobody knows.
There was a lot of cultural interchange sloshing around the Mediterranean when Christianity formed in late antiquity. Pseudo-Egyptian mystery cults were all the rage. Let's not forget that Christianity springs from Judaism and by their own traditions, Jews claim to have been slaves in Egypt for a long time. Some scholars go further and say the Jewish tribes were not "captured and brought to Egypt" but rather originated there as a splinter-group that migrated outward. In this case, would the word "Amen" be some vestige of Egyptoid solar worship?
Meanwhile, the Roman Emperor Constantine who was the first to convert to Christanity was previously a sun-worshipper (cult of "Sol Invictus," a sun God.) He would have been familiar with Egyptiain and mel-Egyptian concepts of solar dieties. Perhaps the inclusion of "Amen" refers to such a sun God and reflects ambivilence, misunderstanding, or straight-up esoteric retention of old deitity-worship "hdden in plain sight?"
Lotta different strands here. It's hard to know who to trust or what to believe. Personally I have no agenda or dog in this fight other than a curiosity to know the truth about this, one way or another.
Since its a highly-charged emotional issue I expect people to have strong views and biases on this, but for me it's just an interesting historico-religious enigma.
>>1319259
no. Amen is from the Hebrew, literally "Amen". It's not an emotionally charged issue.
Literally Zeitgeist-tier rumors. >>1319266 has it right.
>>1319259
>Christian
Its literally in all Abrahamic shit prayers. It simply means "so be it.
Did this film accuratley portray the stuff the army was using in the Vietnam war?
>>1319209
What do you mean, like, drugs and M16s, or what?
>>1319209
There are better films than Forrest Gump that depict the American soldiers' perspective of Vietnam. Platoon is good, Hamburger Hill, Apocalypse Now, Full Metal Jacket, Jacob's Ladder.
>>1319209
yes
Why did Germany declare war on the United States after Pearl Harbor?
Why did the Pacific and European conflicts need to be part of the same war?
The Germans were allied to Japan...
>>1319171
>Why did Germany declare war on the United States after Pearl Harbor?
Because unlike the rest of Europe, Germany actually respects their alliances?
>>1319171
I know that Germanotard mind has troubles with comprehending basic things like "not stabbing everybody in the back on every possible occasion" but this was one rare occasion where Hitler kept his promise. He was allied with Japan, so he had to do it.
Any historical examples of a Pyrrhic victory?
Bonus points for being baited into a win and then losing a war.
Well if you didn't knew phyrric victory comes from Pyrrhus of Epirus in the first Punic war who always won the battle but could not reinforce in the way Rome could, so his casualties meant more to him than e Roman casualties Medano to the Romans
Pyrrhus' invasion of Italy
>>1319066
>Punic war
>Pyrrhus of Epirus
pick one
Is "picking and choosing" from a dogma, religious or no, a good thing to do?
I would argue it's just being honest. Acting on or believing things you don't really believe in doesn't make sense.
Pic unrelated.
No, because it demonstrates that your universal truths aren't universal at all.
By picking and choosing you're essentially debunking your own claim to absolute truth
>>1318834
What if one didn't have a problem with that and thought like many others that no major world religion has it completely right?
But that's just a bunch of snowflake nonsense, innit? After all, theres such a variety of 5 religions to choose from!
I have no respect for anyone who "chooses" a religion like they're a catalog
I don't know where to go to find an answer to this, /his/ seemed like the closest board to the topic, if this isn't applicable I'll fuck off
>inb4 OP should fuck off anyway
So, I recently purchased this old looking incense pot/urn/burner which looks kind of like a gryphon or hippogryph. It has two "pipes" for ears which allow the incense smoke to float out when using cones
>Pic related is the burner
I thought it looked interesting, and for 5 dollars at a junk sale I figured I'd at least have a burner if nothing else.
I've been trying to look up where it might be from, how old it is, or if it is even really an incense burner or not but I've come up with very little. I love following the history of objects like this and trying to learn about them, but I'm stumped.
I'm hoping if there are any anons knowledgeable about this stuff on this board they might be able to offer me some insight.
The best I've found is this:
>It is similar to some older asian incense burners, but most look more like traditional animals
>It might be really old depending on what it is made out of, but I also get the feeling it might just be a replica/fake
>>1318656
Prolly a granade tbqh desu
>>1320859
Great response, thanks anon, you sure did save me
No idea what it is, but it makes me want to replay shadow of the colossus.
Its probably just random kitschy pottery bit or something a random incense company made. Good luck finding out anything
Can we have a moment of silence for the death of Coptic.
>>1318647
Good night, sweet prince.
Isnt it still alife as a church language for the christian egyptians?
>>1319049
Yes
They're ~10% of the Egyptian population
Is freedom of religion a fundamentally atheistic ideal?
The only way you can guarantee the free practice of all religions is if you believe that none of them have a special monopoly on the truth. If you believe that Christianity is the truth, or Islam is the truth, or Hinduism is the truth, shouldn't you want to promote that religion, that truth, over the others? Promoting the equality of all religions is the same as declaring all religions invalid. Am I wrong?
This was actually a Danish Government philosophy for a while.
Religious freedom is atheism.
I don't speak enough danish though to find the names and texts you want.
From the looks of it those people were spot on about religious freedom .
No. If you believe that only God can pass judgement than you have no power to tell others to believe in things they don't want to. That's a part of Christianity and Islam from what I've read. People obviously just ignore things they don't like.
>>1318299
From a Christian perspective there isn't anything wrong with freedom of religion, there is no political mandate to enforce Christianity as the state religion anywhere in the New Testament. I think a Christian theocracy would be the ideal for a true Christian, but a state which allows freedom of religion is committing no sin, nor is a politician who believes all people ought to at least have the right to associate with whatever religion they wish to associate with. Christianity is almost entirely apolitical sans a few things that have to do with usury. A Christian can, by political persuasion, disallow freedom of religion, but does not have to.
This is in stark contrast to Islam which demands that all believers seek to instate Shariah. Not obeying Shariah is a sin to a Muslim, as is failing to enforce it, so they can not and will never tolerate freedom of religion in their nations because that is not a part of Shariah. At the very least non-Muslims must pay a special tax and are afforded fewer rights than Muslims.
Freedom of religion is a secular ideal, but is perfectly compatible with Christianity, and not compatible at all with Islam.
Bringing this around again because I'd like to try and get closer to a conclusion.
This is kind of a long story so I'm going to dump the facts as they were discussed on /sci/ a little over 3 years ago. As far as I know, no one has really done any more work on this mystery since then. It got 2 threads on /sci/ back in 2013 and we figured out as much as we could. Then I posted it on /x/ last year. They were interested, but not particularly helpful or willing to put in any extra effort into solving the mystery. Plus it's not really on topic over there.
Anyway, what you're looking at is a scrap of paper that an anon found behind the paper backing of a mirror he bought at auction. There is seemingly a code and some other symbols written on it. On /sci/, we decoded the message as best we could and obtained the message. I'm pretty confident that the resulting message we got and the location are correct, however, I'd like to know more about what it could possibly mean, any estimate to the age, and possibly who could have written the message.
I haven't been sure where to post this. The people on /sci/ seemed to have little interest in doing anything with it after we cracked the code, and none of them really knew much about this part of the world or history in general. /pol/ is a little bit crazy and I doubt they'd be interested, and /x/ wasn't that interested either. I feel like you guys would probably have the best chance of figuring this out, and it's really made me curious for a while now. My major isn't history or anything and I never really had time to sit down and do research.
I'm assuming /his/ is a bit of a slow board so I'll post a bit of background info first and some pictures from the thread (unfortunately, I only save the original note picture, none of the mirror). The photos of the mirror are going to be thumbnails, but they should give you an idea of what we're working with.
>>1318173
The first order of business was deciphering the text. Since it was hidden in a mirror, an anon had the brilliant idea that the numbers were actually supposed to be mirrored. Once this was done, the little arrow shown going over 6 spaces was guessed to be indicative of a simple Caesar cipher. Shortly afterwards, this message was posted.
I've got a summary of some other facts which I'll post at the end of this dump, but for the most part this message seems correct, considering the other clues on the note which I'll post next.
>>1318173
It's a formulaic fugue, dumbass. Of course /x/ can't figure it out, because fucking aliens, and /sci/ probably completely overlooked the simplicity of the answer.
>>1318185
Next up, the letters and numbers underneath the arrow. These were solved in a similar manner, although they were not mirrored. So just a simple Caesar cipher and we got Latitude and Longitude coordinates. I'm not exactly sure why they aren't mirrored, but that's the only way they line up reasonably close with any sort of landmass.
If vast cities and communities existed thousands of years ago, where are they? It seems as though most cities were built within the last 500 years. Did people from thousands of years ago have cities?
>this is an average /his/ poster
Literally, not figuratively, literally, literally kill yourself.
>>1318149
wew, lad.
Is this a real question? Not sure if trolling.
Why was this great ancient civilization so easy to conquer and hold onto for centuries at a time?
>>1318100
Fucking desert, dude
>>1318100
Egypt was notoriously easy to conquer after it had already been going for about 2500 years.
China was also notoriously humiliated by Western powers at about that age.
Western civilization has been going for about that time too (depending on when you start counting) and is proving to be notoriously weak nowadays, with the only real reason it hasn't been invaded being that one of its out-shoots is merely about 300 years old.
Maybe it's just the lifespan of civilizations. Keep in mind that, for all intents and purposes, Egypt was Greece's Greece. Look at Greece nowadays.
>>1319469
>western civilization is notoriously weak these days
If you live in the real world and not /pol/ you'd notice that the West is more powerful than any other civilisation in the world, economically, militarily, culturally, politically, and so on. In absolutely no way comparable to Egypt or China in the decades you talk about. And Chinese civ had been going for 5,000 years in the late 19th century so take your teleological 2,500 mysticism and eat shit with it :/
>Someone tells me I'm living on stolen land from the Indians
>Look it up
>All the land in my area was negotiated, paid for, and had treaties signed over it by all local tribes
wow fucking racist pay reparations
>Founder of your state was a pacifist who is hailed for how he treated the natives here
>Still get told the land is stolen and your ancestors were evil
>aliens come down to earth
>they have tons of gold
>we trade them land for it
>we learn that there is no value for gold in their economy after their economy envelopes us
>they call it "space dust" and use the Quartonium Standard to back up and gauge the worth of their currency
>our gold is worthless
>200 years later some alien post on an imageboard about how his people got the land fairly
>you take another shot of Fireball and shut down your computer
Please educate me on the Duchy of Brittany, how come they managed to remain independent from Charlemagne's Empire?
>>1317728
Pretty sure it was tributary or something similar to Charlemagne.
Also it was christian and relatively irrelevant so not really a prioritary target.
Other anons may know more about the subject.
So Brittany = French Wales?
>>1317749
Pretty much.
Why did Japan lose so badly?
>>1317724
When you're outbuilt about 8:1 on most relevant classes of ships, against an opponent who tends to build better ships and planes than you've got, it almost always ends badly.
inferior technology, inferior industrial output, inferior leadership, inferior spirit
>>1317724
Outnumbered, outgunned, fighting on multiple fronts, inferior industrial base, inferior material base, inferior technology, outdated tactics, extreme distance from allies