I know this isn't /lit/, but does anyone here have a recommendation for a book on the crusades? I'm looking for something that goes into good detail and sticks to a historical perspective rather than playing politics. It doesn't have to be comprehensive or 1500 pages, just a good primer on the historical aspects of the period and the events.
Anyone have any ideas about this?
>good detail and sticks to a historical perspective rather than playing politics
The Crusades (1966) by Zoe Oldenbourg is exactly that
>>1318934
Thanks anon, I'll look into it
Crusades bibliography:
http://pastebin.com/7h8fASgv
How long would it take to dye a piece of clothing (maybe a glove or a cape) tyrian purple?
Also what would it cost?
>>1317958
/diy/
>>1318177
it's a pretty historically relevant question
>ITT:Historical figures you can't help but romanticise.
>Napoleon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffeOvwBYkf4
>>1317923
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinsengumi
in reality they were basically an organized group of professional killers, but that code of theirs and the way they fought to the end makes them pretty romantic, that and the Ikeda ya affair
Why did he get BTFO so hard in the post-war election?
he was a tory, Labour was gaining a lot of momentum, Attlee was promising the 'New Jerusalem' which many who suffered from rationing and blitz craved
also many (sadly I have no source on hand) believed at the time that he was an excellent crisis leader but a poor choice to lead Britain post-War
Didn't he sperge out on how Labour was disloyal to the union and almost went full tinfoil-cap about it?
Just a friendly reminder that he signed off most of the British Empire and its huge cache of patents at the time, to the States.
Not saying that this wasn't more or less inevitable at some point, perhaps he even managed to get favourable terms for the UK, but he still did it.
Redpill me on this guy, /his/.
>inb4 holocaust stuff
A very depraved, sick genius and made arguments based on a wealth of first-hand sources and showed us a lot of what we take for granted is just Enlightenment memes.
Great insights on biopower.
See Jeremy Bentham's Panopticon and shit.
Picked up a fight with the gay community back then when he hinted that sexuality was a choice.
>>1317763
>he hinted that sexuality was a choice.
I don't think he ever said it was a choice as if you actively choose to be gay, but that it's a fetish that develops due to your surroundings.
Did fascism's cult of the body contribute to their militarism, was it the other way around, or were the two unrelated?
>>1317449
The other way round, I'd say. Martial societies naturally prize physical fitness.
The other way, fit people -> fit army
In regads to WW1, why do establishment historians keep pushing the meme that "Ludendorff and the general staff essentially ran the entire country during the war" when the exact same can be said about Churchill and his war cabinet in regards to britain during WW2?
It's only natural that military leaders would make most of the domestic decisions during wartime circumstances, which holds true both for the german kaiser and the british queen
It has to do with the 'stab in the back meme'.
If Ludendorff is seen as running the country than he couldn't be stabbed in the back by the people running the country because he was running the country.
Personally I'd think if Ludendorff said he was stabbed in the back, which he did,he probably felt that way.
It would have been alot easier for him to own the decision for armistace with the established government and media on his side than to decide to surrender than make up a story about being stabbed in the back and shitting all over his own massive decision to armistance.
The bigger picture is though if Ludendorff ran the country than the entire foundation of Nazism is wrong and based on a lie that Hitler and Ludendorff made up to trick people.
Its my opinion that promoting the stab in the back as a 'myth' is more likely to be propaganda from the US used in order to keep germany stable during occupation and to kill political nationalist sentiment there.
>>1317197
"Ludendorff and the general staff essentially ran the entire country during the war" when the exact same can be said about Churchill and his war cabinet in regards to britain during WW2?
Because Churchill was PM, and Ludendorff was not Chancellor/Kaiser. Are you pretending to be thick or what?
>>1317302
>Because Churchill was PM, and Ludendorff was not Chancellor/Kaiser
Monty and Brooke regularly told Churchill what was what and he generally deferred to their judgement.
Was it for the best?
>>1316347
No, India should have stayed as a British subject.
>>1316347
For the best of the UK.
>>1316350
Britain is now a subject of Brussels. Pathetic fools cant even vote to save their own goddamn sovereignty.
Did he ever visit the Pyramids?
>>1316129
No.
>>1316129
Did the Pyramids ever visit him?
What is the best book on the history of philosophy available in English? Length is of no concern, but it is incredibly important to me that it gives an in-depth analysis instead of just skimming the subject.
Well obviously A History of Western Philosophy by Russell
>>1315974
Niggasrs
>>1315966
Antony Kenny has very good introductions. If you like romans and easy reading you should try Sophie's World as well.
>>1315607
>They
fuck i mean he.
I was originally going to post some other injuns but i was to lazy
gjge OP
How he had such nice hair? Yeah, I wanna know that too.
>Amid soaring inflation, the average monthly salary across Russia shrank to 31,200 rubles ($500).
lol.
This makes me kinda sad for the people there and is also nothing you should be happy over even if you oppose them as a whole.
If their population is poor, it is desperate and angry, if it is desperate and angry its more likely to pick up rifles and risk its life against whoever gets pointed at by the kremlin.
>>1315174
>If their population is poor, it is desperate and angry, if it is desperate and angry its more likely to pick up rifles and risk its life against whoever gets pointed at by the kremlin.
So how Russia always been?
>>1315181
Nah, 10 years ago trading relations with europe were better and we liked each other more because we saw each other as being mutually beneficial.
At least I dont know about them having a greater grudge then.
Now the sanctions give them a reason to see us as withholding them income out of spite even though if we didnt do so before and the population gets hyped up for every "righteous" agressions their government carries out.
Are there any philosophy books on the question "What is consciences?" Like is this all real?r
Hume?
>>1314930
Hume is a bit arid though, lol.
Maybe Jim Holt, on why the world exists? But not really what you're looking for I guess.
It sounds a bit too abstract my man.
Maybe Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception, or a bit of Hegel's P. of the Spirit.
Read David Chalmers.
"By God, sir, I've lost my leg!"
'' by god sir .. you did ''
i fucked up .. i meant '' By God, sir, so you have ''
>a high level of discourse is expected.
What is your favourite period of Roman History and why?
I'm going to be a conformist and say the end of the republic, just because Caesar was such a badass motherfucker.
Second punic war is another great period.
Early Republican period
Fuck Etruscans
>Late Republic
>Augustus' reign
>Nerva-Antonine dynasty's reign (except for Commodus)
>>1314283
>no Caligula
>no stabbing water and collecting sea shells