https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/4vyd2r/why_is_my_approach_to_thinking_about_philosophy/
What do you think of my Reddit topic? Nobody answered it in a worthhwile way
Interesting seeing this behaviour amongst Redditors.
>>>/reddit/
>>1595652
The AskScience related subreddits aren't even that bad. You want to steer away from the subreddits in which circle jerking turns out badly.
As the title implies: what's the deal with war crimes? What pushes soldiers and officers to commit them? Why are they condemned so rigidly today when they were not just a century ago? Let me hear those opinions, /his/.
Any good books on the subject you all recommend?
>>1595474
They were in existence a century fucking ago.
The Hague started meeting in the 19th Century.
>>1595486
>when they were not [condemned as rigidly as today]
I admit my own shortcomings. English is not my first language. It is to be said that nowadays the attitude towards abuse towards prisoners or civilians is incredibly strict, something that I don't see as being the case in the past centuries. Am I wrong in my assumptions? Please, correct my ignorance.
It is my reasoning that abuse towards prisoners and civilians of an opposing country become more prevalent the more rooted in ideology the conflict in question is. This may lead to the deduction that the rise of propaganda thanks to the improvements in communication may be assigned as one of the causes of the rise of ideological war crimes during the first half of the 20th century. At the same time, the media can assume the role of "saviours", as giving public attention to these acts makes it easier to see them and condemn them. Are war crimes a media-related phenomenon, then?
there is no such thing as war crimes, the winner takes it all, Stalin killed millions of his own people and USA dropped 2 nukes on a civilian city, and they never got shit about it cause they won, war crimes happen all the time in the conflicts of today's world except some are covered by the media and the ones choosing which one is covered are the ones in power.
Was the First World War really "the most pointless war ever" as is commonly believed? As I was unsure if that were the truth, because did countries like France and Belgium not have just as much justification if not more to fight in WW1 than in WW2?
There were valid reasons for it to be fought but it didn't need to be as extreme and long as it was.
>>1595247
>pointless
Literally how though
All participants had their reasons that weren't any worse than any other reasons any nation has ever had for going to war
>>1595247
it didnt so much when u walked into a village and recruited the fit and able men and handed them all a spear and uniform but now we are getting to automatic weapons and nuclear arsenals
shame human psychology didn't evolve along the same tandem gradiant
>The Nuremberg trails were an injustice that used ex post facto laws
Does /his/ agree with Col. Peron?
>>1594954
Last I checked, the illegality of murder was not an ex post facto law. The war crimes most certainly were not as most of those laws had been in place since before WWI and then amended immediately after.
>>1594954
The Trials went easy on the fuckers
>>1595729
That wasn't Peron's point
What's your stance on the matter, /his/?
Strange
These notes say otherwise
http://eprints.utas.edu.au/1887/
>After separation from mainland Australia, the Tasmanian people were not able to share any of the new technological advances being made by mainland groups. This made the Aboriginal Tasmanians a people that could flourish with some of the simplest technologies on record.
Is this the worst case of Rose-tinted glasses in history?
>>1594842
Abo extinction can't come soon enough
What does It mean to gauge yourself against reality?
>>1594652
It is a different experience for many.
For some it means finally recognizing your absolute and seemingly inconceivable insignificance in relation to your city, your region, your country, your world, and your universe. For others, it is an audit on our ego. And for others still it is the only way they can stay self-aware.
It means to become whole.
>>1594652
open your third eye
agree or disagree? if d, explain llife
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gd9OhYroLN0
>>1594433
He created carnivorous organisms. That's kind of mean.
>>1594445
yea basically the only way to live is to consume other life forms, and life like totally sucks balls unless you live in your moms basement like poster #2
How brutal was Charlemagne?
I am made of gold.
GOLD
>>1594410
t. Sharlemanye
ITT: historical helmets
You sure that's not the village bucket?
Aztecfag strikes again.
What philosophy best resembles a kind of conscious, willful sociopathy?
>>1594029
The one in my diary.
>>1594029
Will historians take the late 2000s sociopathy meme as an indicator of actual trends, or just evidence that Sherlock was way overrated?
>>1594032
I mean, there's so much information overload on the internet I highly doubt historians will analyze each and every meme, especially a niche meme like sociopath wojak or even wojak himself
And the historians of tommorow won't say anything too dicey in king Sander's democratic-socialist empire
hey /his/!
I need your input. I know this isn't /lit/, but I'm writing a book of a German infantryman during WW2.
Out of these 3, which was the most involved in major battles of WW2?
-2nd Panzer Division "Das Reich"
-7th Panzer Division
-16th Infantry Division
(Feel free to add any more. Remember, he's a german infantryman. Maybe Waffen SS even.)
>pic sort of related
>>1594006
>im going to write about muh nazis even though i dont know anything about them
Edgy as fuck
>>1594012
Yeah I kind of agree. I'm highly interested in them but I don't really have the time to study up on them.
>>1594021
You have to do a shittone of reading dude. You are going to look really funny
>Le if your ancestors didn't murder other people and take their shit and force them to do wor you aint shit meme
Anybody hate this? Why the fuck are we celebrating the great human gimmedats known as empires? Empires suck and literally benifit nobody but the wealthy ruling class. Every time you praise an empire, you are literally cheering on as a few mad egotistical assholes stomp all over everyone around them (including their bloody countrymen)
>>1593924
It's a small price to pay in comparison to how quickly we advance technologically under some sort of governing rule.
>>1593924
True but too much to ask for a board that mostly gets its history from strategy games
>>1593924
The concept of property is gimedat
Why does anyone say the Soviets single-handedly won the war when they did fuck-all in the Pacific Theater?
>>1593830
They destroyed the Kwantung Army in a couple of weeks.
>>1593830
>the pacific
>relevant
When people in Europe think of war they generally think of the European front. They may think of Pearl Harbor and the nukes but between that it's a gap.
And the Germans at least had a chance.
Japan was doomed from the start.
>Interested in brushing up on my history for the first time since high school
>Have no idea where to start
>Ooh there's that new history board. I bet there's some good resources in the sticky
Wtf. Every other sticky on every other board has links for beginners.
Anyway, where do you guys get your history from?
/his/
>>1593529
Tell us a specific subject, a person, an event, a time period, whatever, and we'll recommend you some shit. There are too many things that encompass "history and humanities" to fit on a sticky. We'd have to have a /his/ wiki like /mu/ or /lit/.
>>1593529
I'm not reading much history these days but books and journals are the only sources for nonfictional subjects. The web is great for light reading, but to actually learn, use it to find the right books.
Can someone, ideally a Russian speaker, explain this clearer?
>>1593517
Lisa Frank was a Russian and did tattoos before coming to America to make stationary.
I'm Russian, but I don't think I can explain or translate it better than it already is on the page. It's just three Russian words serving as abbreviations for sentences provided in the image. The cats are supposed to signify a thief and his loved one I suppose.
http://learn-russian.livejournal.com/876328.html