Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 2937. page

>>1601947

Very likely he did them himself, with acid.

During his lifetime there were lots of priests who doubted him. Some produced testimonies and documents exposing him. Everyone was silenced by the Vatican, since the Church under John Paul II turned into mass production of saints.

>>1601947
Just your usual papist lies, bullshit and hoaxes.

Wouldn't be the first time a religious nutjob mutilated himself.

>>1601882
Catholic s are such ducks they now feel the need to pander to fedoras

>>1601882
>Godcucks are fighting each other
>yet again

>>1601882
Catholicism isn't an extension of Babylonian paganism, it's an extension of Roman/Hellenistic paganism. Seems like Catholics try as hard as they can to deny this, as hard as Protestants deny that the early Christians clearly engaged in these practices.

I guess I would define it as having an extremely high IQ. However, that does not mean "geniuses" are intelligent in every day matters or are well-informed in every area. Albert Einstein for example considered himself a socialist while the average 100 IQ redneck would be able to refute every one of his economic/political arguments

>he correct scale for adjusting the hierarchy of intelligences is furnished by the degree in which the mind takes merely individual or approaches universal views of things. The brute recognizes only the individual as such: its comprehension does not extend beyond the limits of the individual. But man reduces the individual to the general; herein lies the exercise of his reason; and the higher his intelligence reaches, the nearer do his general ideas approach the point at which they become universal.

-Arty Schopenhauer

>>1601759
>For him who can understand aright ...the relation between the genius and the normal man may, perhaps, be best expressed as follows: A genius has a double intellect, one for himself and the service of his will; the other for the world, of which he becomes the mirror, in virtue of his purely objective attitude towards it. The work of art or poetry or philosophy produced by the genius is simply the result, or quintessence, of this contemplative attitude, elaborated according to certain technical rules.
The normal man, on the other hand, has only a single intellect, which may be called subjective by contrast with the objective intellect of genius. However acute this subjective intellect may be — and it exists in very various degrees of perfection — it is never on the same level with the double intellect of genius; just as the open chest notes of the human voice, however high, are essentially different from the falsetto notes. These, like the two upper octaves of the flute and the harmonics of the violin, are produced by the column of air dividing itself into two vibrating halves, with a node between them; while the open chest notes of the human voice and the lower octave of the flute are produced by the undivided column of air vibrating as a whole. This illustration may help the reader to understand that specific peculiarity of genius which is unmistakably stamped on the works, and even on the physiognomy, of him who is gifted with it.

+1 le reddit upvote

Imagine how many timed this rice eating surrender monkey must have laid down his weapons

>>1601599
shameful

I don't think that is too accurate considering some of those people like Paul and Jesus barely have any personality traits written down about them besides love. The large majority of that list is not even people with psycopathic traits, just using words to judge someone's personality is very flawed

>>1601383
Inaccurate, most demonstrated close feelings to loved ones and their sociopathic behavior can be attributed to run of the mill dehumanization of those outside your inner circle which most normies are perfectly capable of. I also notice a distinct lack of some of the most notable 20th century dictators of a certain political persuasion.

>>1601383
>Jesus
>no Muhammad

>>1601341
Napoleon was the last monarch to lewd armies while in power

Napoleon was also based as all fuck

>>1601349
Fuck off napoleonfag

>>1601341
Gradually from 13th century onwards.

You always had a struggle between the monarch and the people (read: Wealthy nobles, not the peasants)

In the early and high middle ages, a country was successful if it had a strong, all powerful king who could keep the nobles in line, he dominated, he led his country, and it was a success. Power was maintained through actual power, be it political skill or military skill, not really through law. The best and greatest example of this would be Henry II of England. This Angevin empire was held together because of him alone, it fell apart soon after. This was the entire of the power kings, after this the nobles want not necessarily more power but not fairness and rights. This is where parliaments begin to be birthed and over the next few centuries the power of monarchs is chipped away, we stop seeing kings take part in battles and directly rule their land and see them more being figure heads and general guiders.

>>1601167
there was a push for STEM fields because its what we needed for much of US history and it "made money"

because most parents are filthy dumb mouth-breathing morons

>>1601167
Because we now have a vocational view of education. You see this, at least in the US, when the topic of high school education reform comes up. One of the most common complaints is that much of the classes a student spends their time in have nothing to do with their future job. Whether or not this is correct, it shows a value-shift towards practical and lucrative skills rather than any higher minded learning.

The reason this attitude is so prominent is probably worthy of a PHD dissertation. I mean it arguably stems back to the industrial revolution. Not to mention some of the post world war mentality.

they did

>>1601107
In the past not many had the privilege of free time. Those that did become naturalists, philosophers or inventors and so forth. Hobbyist scientists.

>>1601107
Could you imagine only knowing the people in your village. If you didn't like them you were fucked. Now we can have discussions with intellectuals from all over the world despite our geographic fates. What a time to be alive

>>1601009
They still exist, they are just culturally Arabized natives.

For example, the Palestinians are genetically closer to Cypriots than to gulf arabs.

The arabs didn't really go in for full-scale colonization (except in Egypt). They usually just kicked over the native leadership, converted the people and smeared on a new ruling class

>>1601018

Did these people vary much in looks, like you would see in a southern Italian and a Dane?

Basically everyone refers to them as "Arabs" now, despite not being from the gulf.

File: Fayum-portrait.jpg (238KB, 886x1139px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 886x1139px

>>1601035
They looked like they do now. So called "Arabs" actually have a very diverse set of phenotypes based on region. The only thing that unites them is language (which also varies a lot by region) and religion.

File: 1467457461690.jpg (45KB, 389x390px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 389x390px

Second Thirty Years' War (1914-1945)

>>1600888
The Emergency

The patriotic war

>>1600702
Mormonism is Islam for Whitey

>>1600702
I'll counter though; a vast majority of Mormons are attractive, well groomed and in good health. Physically at least.

>>1600717
Explain

>>1600591

The International Space Station.

Shit is so fucking cash.

Else, it probably was the Capitalist/Communist/Third World Undecided Countries.

>>1600591
NATO

I assume you're talking about military alliance/coalition

>>1600591
NATO obviously. What else would even come close?

File: image.jpg (343KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 1366x768px

Isn't it funny the bible deines sola Scriptura?

File: 20160802_233426.jpg (129KB, 628x480px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 628x480px

>>1600338
Catholic, Abyssinian, Copic and Orthodox bibles are older by far. What is your rationale??

Or, are you just BAIT?

File: Utter retardation.png (173KB, 1520x1656px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1520x1656px

>>1600338
>How can you even justify reading any other version?
I honestly do not know how any Christian can claim to read the words of god outside the OT. I mean it's pretty explicit that is not what you are meant to do.

>The incident demonstrated the weakness of the NATO alliance in its lack of planning and co-operation beyond the European stage.

>From the point of view of General de Gaulle, the Suez events demonstrated to France that it could not rely on its allies; the British had initiated a ceasefire in the midst of the battle without consulting the French, while the Americans had opposed Paris politically. The damage to the ties between Paris and Washington D.C. "culminated in President de Gaulle's 1966 decision to withdraw from the military integration of NATO".[360]

Never trust an Anglo

Reading about this event never fails to piss me off. If I had a time machine, I'd kill eisenhower.

>>1600194
>Frog and Bongs act like old colonial powers
>Ruins any chance for the USA to act as a moral high ground in the Budapest revolt

>>1600022
not surprising, a people's rebellion can never, NEVER be crushed. there's just too many people compared to the amount of soldiers

>>1600022
Why is the name of the battle cropped out?

What battle is it?

>>1600031
Battle of new Orleans. It has a goat song.
https://youtu.be/50_iRIcxsz0