https://www.reddit.com/r/askphiloso phy/comments/4vyd2r/why_

Interesting seeing this behaviour amongst Redditors.

>reddit
>>>/reddit/

>>1595652
The AskScience related subreddits aren't even that bad. You want to steer away from the subreddits in which circle jerking turns out badly.

>>1595664
>>>/pol/

It reminds me on Plato's preference for dialectic over writing. Sit down in person, define everything that needs defining in person, talk to one another in person.

But it's not like a context is impossible to be found when reading any given question or answer, or that I must agree 100% with a person's own choice of axioms in order to benefit from reading his stuff.

Yes, Euclidean geometry has indeed postulates, it doesn't make it pointless or inane.

Or do you perhaps hold a dogmatic position that knowledge is not possible, or that one cannot know anything?

All you did was provide a Wikipedia link to the Munchausen Trillemma, you didn't define anything else, by your logic we should be lead to discard most of what is said in it as inane and pointless - whichever that means (because they're left undefined).

No wonder it'd be difficult to intentionally change your mind with a worthwhile post, when neither change nor mind nor worthwhile are defined.

Surely you find no objections to this philosophy, i.e. yours.
Tell me, do you feel enlightened by your intelligence yet?