Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 2385. page

Great thread Op

>>1968389
When did Aragon own Athens?

>>1968389
>>1968389
>The Aragonese Crown: the bullied wife of Castile

How sad it is to be Aragonese and read this nonsense; Aragon abandoned the concept of nation by the hispanic union, Castile also did and neither the Aragon nor the previous Castile exist at the moment.

Currently we all feel Spanish, not "Aragoneses" and "Castellanos".

File: 1470569880507.jpg (469KB, 1530x1127px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 1530x1127px

>>1967032

File: 1473682008541.gif (463KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 480x270px

>>1967033

File: IMG_4284.jpg (85KB, 604x393px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 604x393px

>>1966901
>anything good
>from the East

>>1967016
Everything is east of something anon

>>1967026

Not Valinor.

>>1966518
I've never heard of any ballets where I live and I've never seen one performed. I like some of the music though. I listen to Prokofiev's Romeo & Juliet sometimes.

The Royal Opera House has an excellent video series on the history of ballet, with visual examples.

Playlist: https://youtu.be/auDNcfK0Wcs?list=PLFEuShFvJzBww3lVbFABGB0HbIxNQ2TiA

>>1966518
>How does ballet today differ from ballet in the late 19th century?
It's a lot of technical stuff that's hard to describe verbally, much of it has to do with how extreme extensions were. Overall the technique was very similar though, although modern ballet technique is much more rigid in that it emphasizes full extensions much more.

Body types of dancers were very different, so were the feet and ideal body weights. In general, the modern dancer has longer legs, longer arms, longer neck, shorter torso, smaller bust and is skinnier than their late 19th century counterpart. Modern dance feet are more ideal. Feet are another thing that's hard to describe.

The preferred costume has also changed, its become more desirable to see much more of the dancers leg.

File: 1472001259243.jpg (77KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 640x640px

>>1964755
post more of these

Climate, mostly.

File: K9yCFCc.jpg (699KB, 1929x914px) Image search: [Google]

699KB, 1929x914px

>>1933116
It has to do with the fact French are superior in every way. France is possibly the most aesthetic country in earth, it helps that they were very populous during most of history thus have a lot of towns. It also had a lot of cultures under its borders which lead to a great deal of diversity in aesthetics.

>>1933128
>>1933116

Do Europeans really live in those tiny post card houses? Don't you want space?

>>1977436
Unfeasible, because even though that's pretty orthodox Marxism, most people since the cold war think Stalinism is the same thing as Marxism.

>>1977436
>Libertarian Democratic Marxism

You could have just stopped at Libertarian. It's only in America where that means "Right"-Libertarianism. In every other nation, 'Libertarian' refers to Anarchism/Anarchist. Which, generally, contains all three things you listed above.

>>1977489
There's a pretty big split in libertarianism if you consider property a natural right or a tool for oppression. A lot of intellectuals listed property as a basic natural right, alongside with life and liberty.

I mean, back when you had aristocracy and shit, the answer was the same for both sides. Give property rights to everyone so people can stop being oppressed by people with property. It's clear that every having property rights is more libertarian than only some people having property rights. But that's where the ideological split begins. Some people see the elimination of property rights as oppressive. Some people see the institution of property rights as oppressive.

>>1977036
great so it only requires blood sacrifice to sustain it

>>1977045
seems like a small price really

File: 525b2d0b38e30.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>1977036
>what a vibrant and rich land I have chanced upon, with no means to defend themselves. We had better leave these people alone for the good of humanity.

probably some hippie, forced, multiculti syncretic religion

kind of like baha'i but with more liberal shit added, and even more obviously forced

Assuming new, radical off-shoots from Christianity don't count as entirely new religions?

The Chinese will probably adopt something after the enforced atheism collapses. That's the largest group without a religion. Probably a charismatic form of Daoism, if recent trends are anything to go by.

Apocalyptic Environmental cultism is probably on the horizon too.

no religion was invented from zero but by reforming existent ones

File: wrong.jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x360px

>>1974268

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRISPR

>>1974268
It didn't.

The only thing you're semi-right about is that the pharmaceutical industry has too much influence over the government.

Try making this sort of thread on /sci/ and see what happens.

Really? Did you need to make a second thread to complain about regulations while the other one is still running?

Fucking sage.

>>1973722
What's pretty pathetic is that the cowardly Brits at Dunkirk were saved by a heroic last stand of the French army
And now they try to silence that truth to make Brits pass for the heroes of that episode

It's pretty sad given that it was the only heroic moment the French had in WW2

File: dunk.jpg (114KB, 1148x629px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1148x629px

Btw, here's what actually happened at Dunkirk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6C5P-AYGdY

File: 2az.jpg (576KB, 2260x2177px) Image search: [Google]

576KB, 2260x2177px

Are the french the nation that gets its history the most cucked by modern entertainment media?

First BF1 tries to make them pass for a secondary nation of WW1 while insanely overrating the already overrated britbongs
Now that
How can frogs ever recover?

Why does the Buddha always look so feminine?

>>1973478

Buddhism really doesn't have inconsistencies. The entire religion pushes in one direction: experiencing "thus", or total mindfulness of human experience in the moment

There's no god, there's no afterlife, it's all based upon human life and a mindset that frees you from suffering.

>>1973522
I believe having a fair and gentle appearance is associated with holiness.

I think it might b cool and we will inevitably,trend toward it (but only because of muh robots)

File: kikes dindu nuffin.jpg (513KB, 1524x1262px) Image search: [Google]

513KB, 1524x1262px

Communism is a jewish plot

>>1973141
I think worker ownership of the means of production is a good idea but I don't like universal democracy within the state.

I also like the way communism tends to be anti-nationalist.

Made my day, mate.

File: Elagabalo_(203_o_204-222_d.C)_-_Musei_capitolini_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall'Orto_-_15-08-2000[1].jpg (124KB, 470x479px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 470x479px

Obvious Roman Emperor "I was a slutty tranny before it was mainstream" Heliogabalus. He even wanted a sex change (namely, cutting his dick off), but had to stop at circumcision. He loved luring Roman men into a trap by pretending to be a (female) whore. Did I mention that by the time he died the little twink was just 19?

>>1972955
>because Ibrahim himself was totally fucking crazy.
Eh, the female sultanate had already begun with the power Suleiman allowed his wife to wield

>in Europe, Asia, Middle East everyone was fucking shotas but suddenly stopped. Why?
Christianity and Islam.

>>1972583
In pre industrial times children were simply an investment. A tool that can help the parents survive and make money.

After industrial revolution children rights developed as parents could survive by working and also provide for kids. Children become something of a pet, a liability after that. That's why people have few kids recent

>>1972621
Pederasty has been looked down on since before the industrial revolution you fucking brainlet