whats good /his/, im curious to what drugs did ancient civilizations use? particularly the ancient Greeks
>>2193291
Drugs are a sin
boipussy
they huffed volcanic fumes
When did the British assume naval dominance? I've heard three conflicting dates. Which one is true?
-Nine Years' War (1688-1697)
-War of Jenkins' Ear (1739-1748)
-Seven Years' War (1756-1763)
1812.
Some time in the mid 1700's. Prior to this, the Dutch's was better.
The 7 years war was when Britain really became a great power in the European theater.
Probably the War of the Spanish succession with the capture of Gibraltar and Mahon.
Can someone explain to me how the British Empire went from being a global superpower from the 1800s-1900s but by 1914 were in a position where they couldn't beat Germany and by 1939 were in danger of being annihilated?
Was the power of the British Empire a meme?
Didn't the British statements in the 19th century realise that the entire empire wasn't resulting in overwhelming land military power and that they needed to bring this about somehow?
I'm equally perplexed as to how the US could rise so quickly and avoid the problems that the British had, and again, why the British 19th century leaders didn't realise the US would become the biggest danger to supersede them as the global power.
>>2193001
>by 1914 were in a position where they couldn't beat Germany and by 1939 were in danger of being annihilated
Rubbish. The British together with their allies managed to win WWI against another two superpowers and while they had a bad start at the beginning of WWII they managed to hold their ground and eventually start winning battles against the Axis powers even before the Yankees joined the war.
>>2193001
Zionism
>>2193001
Having a large empire is actually economically unsustainable. That's why they were losing their colonies in the time of crisis.
Does anyone know where I can find somewhat decent pictures of this exhibit? The only ones I've found are low-quality pictures on Harun's site and monochrome pictures on stock image sites. Please help.
>>2192998
Here's what I'm talking about.
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1987-06-01
>>2192998
no clue lad but you get a bump from me
>>2192998
intresting
Can we get a God appreciation thread going?
Praise be to your holy name, Iao Sabaoth Adonai Elohim, supreme One beyond all aeons, you whose chariot is drawn by the heavenly cherubim.
>muslims are violent people
>You have a soul yourself; how can you say
>That you will take another's soul away
>Pity the ant's that toil beneath your feet -
>They have their souls; to them their souls are sweet
Muslims are violent people today because of Islamic fundamentlism. Reaction to the Western influence and globalization process.
>>2192972
...so we should continue the globalization process and merge with them into one population.
>>2193422
Atleast everyone will be muslim, but i guess then religious discrimination will become racial even in one religion.
I think he's a very impressive historian, and he has pretty massive balls to go against the liberal majority of the social sciences/academic community.
In particular, his work on the impact of the British empire is excellent, ditto with civilization TWATR (though his use of the phrase "killer app" is cringeworthy).
If you aren't in the mood to/haven't already read one of his books, which are quite long, you can check out any of the many youtube videos of him speaking or presenting a BBC program.
>>2192899
Produces much of what he rails against, i.e. too much personal politics in his analysis.
>>2192931
How could he detach that from historical analysis though, outside of strictly non-political topics (E.G. his analysis of the economy of the Weimar republic)
If you're writing about economic history of anything that took place in the last 500 years, I don't know how you could exclude politics.
>>2192899
>I think he's a very impressive historian
Anything after his rothschild biography is absolute garbage, none of it is original and it is purely ideologically driven.
The dude gets to make programmes on the BBC, so claiming he's brave or edgy is utter nonsense.
[Mat 5:27-28] " Ye have heard that it was said, Thou shalt not commit adultery: but I say unto you, that every one that looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart."
So, is having a waifu/fantasizing about animu qts a sin if they aren't real women?
>>2192896
you can commit adultery with an imaginary character in your heart
Sure. Your lust is a sin. It doesn't matter what is the point of your... Lust, real woman of waifu.
>>2192901
>you can commit adultery
At least once, at least here ;-;
post your favorite weapons and armors
pic related belonged to chrarles V
Well, you already posted mine. Isn't it beautiful ?
>>2192830
8-chamber matchlock revolver from the 1500s.
Not widely distributed.
Difficult to make.
Difficult to use.
Way ahead of it's time in terms of design.
>>2192830
While that fun really does look beautiful I really do wonder at how comfortable would it be to shoot. That grip's angle seems absolutely atrocious on your wrist.
Also pic related favourite weapon (well style of weapon anyway).
Would the USSR have been better of had he been the one to succeed Lenin?
literally who
>>2192805
>literally filename
one of the more prominent economic and political theorists of the soviet union and one of the architects of the NEP
no, he would have quickly been butchered by tankies, even Trotsky could have had him
Was Adorno right about most of the stuff? Can we still have a form of capitalism without it destroying authenticity?
>>2192759
I really hope you aren't imlying Adorno had even the tiniest optimism for both capitalism or socialism. Both are enlightenment cuck ideologies.
Honestly Adorno is just secular De Maisre.
>>2192802
Nope but I'm a technologist so to speak so I tend do think that with even more tech progress we can attain enough comfort to start producing authentic art and subsequently again.
I know Adorno thought that technology is just another Enlightenment spook for humans to control ie attain power over nature to easier attain power over humans. Still I remain positive.
>>2192759
>"if we start using technology to allow people to be able to be whatever gender they want, then this will make up for technologies oppressive effects against society"
Was he insane?
Yo what's the best revolution
Define your criteria for 'best'.
>>2192779
Better than the rest
>>2192756
French Revolution :<)
My knowledge is limited to relatively modern history. Where should I start if I want to study human civilization right from the very beginning?
>>2192727
Sumeria
>>2192727
The big bang
Well you could go back and learn about human evolution. Sapiens is a good book for that.
For civilizations, Sumeria and Egypt.
What're the most badass historical units? Operator-like ones, from dawn of man up to the 18thC.
>>2192634
Anybody with the following roles:
Scouting
Arson/raiding attack
Field Espionage
Field intelligence
>>2194338
Skaven gutter runners
Einsatzgruppen.
What was the golden age of the tan colored area?
>>2192623
Pro-tip: Golden ages don't exist. So sick of seeing "When was the golden age of X?" threads on here.
>>2192623
Different parts have had 'golden' ages at different points in time.
It is idiotic to try and amalgamate them into one homogenous geographical region and think that what applied in one place was equivalent in the other.
>>2192663
>Golden ages don't exist.
perhaps in you particular brand of autism they don't, but for most of the world they do and are recorded as such.
>>2192623
The only thing the tan area has in common is having a Muslim majority and being part of the vague Intermediate region https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate_Region
So the Maghreb, Levant, Persia, Arabia, Anatolia, Caucus mountains, Turkistan and northern India don't share a golden age with each other but have separate golden ages if any.