>South secedes and eventually goes bankrupt from trying to sustain a slave-based economy and crawls back to the Union.
>South secedes and slave uprisings ultimately force them to abolish slavery and shift their economy to something more sustainable.
>South secedes and North doesn't have to spend countless lives and money to bring it back into the Union.
So, why did they have a war in the first place?
>>2188841
Seemed like a good idea at the time.
it's literally impossible to go bankrupt from a slave economy selling cash crops
>>2189160
Your nation will remain a shitty place though.
Like Cash crop prices fluctuate, pests and climate., very small skilled worker base of educated population that isn't small. No other industry and anyone trying to compete with any business with slaves will either fail or barely do well.
Which religion do you believe in people of /his/ ?
Why do you believe in it?
And why do you think that it is the right/superior religion then any other
OP here
Atheists are of course welcome also.
>>2188626
I am a Disciple of The Amazing Dildoni.
I have beheld His Glourie.
All other chodely ways are as dust.
>>2188626
I have this weird on and off relationship with Christianity.
Why have the former Asian colonies performed so much better than the former African colonies in the post-imperial era?
asian colonies were better able to maintain their independence, while african powers were obliterated. being next door to Europe made military offensives easier than in asia, so the colonial powers went further in their efforts to exploit them.
also no slave trade
The African colonies were set up to exploit resources of the continent and not much was invested back into local infrastructure or education of the populace. African society had also no bridge between tribal government to liberal democracy and thus struggled greatly to adapt to representative government.
Asian colonies were set up for a different purpose (trade, strategic location) and thus the colonisers had greater interest in funding education for the locals, or for putting money in the area in terms of infrastructure.
What about Central Asia?
Why are most self-professed centrist between right-liberlism and left-liberalism, or liberalism and communism? Wouldn't a more integral centrist philosophy be more akin to Gaullism or Fascism? That golden point between separation of Church and State and integration of Church and State, between protectionism and free trade, etc.
>>2200397
The left saying "racist" isn't a leftist
That is where most centrist are.
Reminder that individualists are the real braino's
>>2200408
>The left saying "racist" isn't a leftist
{{citations needed}}}, unless you think antifa is centrist, which is delusional.
When you vote, do you consider anything besides your own self-interest?
I don't care if you do, but if so you are probably being used as a tool by a spook. Realizing this is the first step to freedom.
>>2198645
self-interest is a spook
>>2198655
How?
>>2198665
interrogatives are spooks
Is this objectively the best way to divide and consolidate European lands?
>>2198447
Great map right!
>>2198441
Horrible idea
why did educated European men during the 18th century have a dislike for Africans/Blacks?
why just hate someone for no reason?
>why did educated European men during the 18th century have a dislike for Africans/blacks?
because they were smart?
>>2197794
>European society is better, freer and more advanced than any other in existence
>society is made up of people
>therefore it's the people who determine how good/advanced a society is
>ergo, primitive societies/less advanced societies are that way because their people are less intelligent, less civic minded, more violent, etc.
There was still respect for Arab/Asian societies due to their prior accomplishments and contemporary systems of organization (Voltaire in particular had a boner for China) but there wasn't much redeeming about sub-Saharan Africans due to the only interactions between the two being procurement of slaves and limited trading.
>>2197830
but the reason Sub Saharian African never developed was because of geographical determinism via Jared Diamond's thesis
Defend racism and eugenics
Protip: You can't
>>2197398
Different races objectively have different average levels of intelligence, not to mention predisposition to violence and personality traits.
Source: Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study, the MAOA-2R allele, etc. etc.
reproduction should be highly regulated and directed by a government agency of eugenic hygiene it isn't the middle ages where we need 18 out of 20 people to be farmhands prove me wrong protip you literally can't
>>2197435
Eugenics will be made obsolete by genetic engineering.
>watch tv show about science
>THE CHRISTIANS HATE SCIENCE, HAVE ALWAYS HATED SCIENCE AND WOULD DO ANYTHING TO STAMP IT OUT
>shitty animation of an inquisitor looking mofo cackling and burning books
Okay I've heard conflicting things from multiple sources, so is this just a meme or did the christians try to stamp out science? From what I have read:
- some christians were annoyed, but others found they were even more christian than ever over the Origin of Species, and charles darwin was highly regarded in secular and religious circles alike until his death
- Galileo challenged the church's authority and that got him in trouble more than supporting heliocentric-ism
- screaming "THATS HERESY" at any scientific theory like a blind jabbering retard would likely get nothing accomplished and the best defense for being called a heretic was to call your accuser one
So are these true or are they memes?
>>2197205
galileo was kind of an asshole
>>2197205
The Catholic Church funded a lot of scientific endeavors in mathematics and physics. They only had a problem if it conflicted with the status quo/bible
IIRC Galileo's bantz with the Pope just went too far.
If the majority of Rome's citizens lived in abject filth and poverty and had to be given a grain dole to not starve to death, what was the point of even keeping them around? Why have a city of a million people if the majority is on the brink of starvation?
Were the Romans sjws?
What?
>Dads walks in
I'm actually baffled by this question. I'm not sure what you're even asking.
Are you asking why cities have people in them?
Once we leave the surace of this planet, will we still continue to wage war in space?
Is history doomed to repeat itself ad infinitum?
Will the deeds of men remain the same?
Probably.
What do you mean repeat? We never had a war in space
>>2196128
As in wage war supported by dumb casus belli
Serious question, why did Hitler invade the Soviet Union even though all his advisers and economists told him that occupying all of western Russia would be more of a drain and burden to the German economy than a benefit to it? What was his motivation if not economics and resources?
>>2196109
He was an incompetent idealist?
>>2196109
Read "mein kampf"
>>2196109
Serious question, why did Icarus flew so close to the sun even though Daedelus told him that sun will melt the wax on his wings? What was his motivation if not escaping with his life?
How did England and France overcome centuries of mutual hatred and rivalry to unite in their common hatred of the Kraut? Especially since Anglos are Germanic to begin with and have a German royal family
You answered your own question
But many French people still hate us English. Makes me sad, I love France.
>>2195441
The 100 years War was fought by Norman-Plantagenet French vs French.
English is a meme.
>>2195528
>this shit every single thread
What does /his/ think of Codreanu and his Iron Guards?
Great man. Sadly he died before his dream for Romania could have happened. He was a great man with the potential of turning Romania great.
Nice circle-jerk guys, do you do any freebies?
Literal Elliot-tier autism.
A lot of people have heard about the Jewish question. But have you heard about the french question?
I've seen one about the Irish, too. All pointing towards the "jew conspiracy", or "we are historians, except when it disagrees with us".
The key difference is the fact that you cannot find a single Jew who condemns the original Bolsheviks, or the history of Jews and their usurious nature throughout Europe. You can't find a Jew that doesn't milk the guilt industry for social brownie points, but you do find blacks that hate BLM and slavery cards (who just want to live beyond the past). But the Jews are unique: there is more about racial superiority in one line of the Talmund than in all of Mein Kampf. They are anti-nationalist for all who are not Jews. Read Maurice Samuel's "You Gentiles".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTYSv_YQOVo
None of this is recent stuff, the Jews have been social parasites for a long time. It's just history you don't want to know, and I don't blame you because it isn't hyper-egalitarian or leftist in nature, and this is a board that does not like things that run contrary to that.
>>2195022
>you can't find a jew who condemns the bolsheviks
Tell that to my jewish friend and his anti-communist rhetoric
Also i'll make it quick and easy:
Be jew in europe, restrained in ghettoes, hated, ostracised (sometimes rightfully, often times not). New ideology comes around preaching equality and overthrowing oppressive governments (bolshevism): jews support it
>>2194966
can /his/ make one with the eternal anglo pls?