Penal transportation, being sent to a colony as punishment of a crime, was used extensively by the British Empire. The founding of colonies in Australia was a direct consequence of the American Revolution leading to Britian not being able to export it's criminals to some of it's other colonies.
Why was transportation so prevalent? Why was there such a need for transportation? Were there more criminals? Did other empires engage in this practice? Is it slavery?
The British were the only people to really embrace transportation because of the Irish. Its the only way to control them.
The British began transportation as a result of possibly two changes crime in Britain. Firstly increased urbanisation brought extra poverty and that led an increase in petty crimes such as stealing and forgery.
Secondly, perceptions to punishment had changed drastically. Public humiliation as a punishment was no longer seen as effective and thus incarceration was seen as the preferred method of keeping criminals out of society and as a way of deterring crime. As we know it wasn't that effect.
So, because of these two factors, gaols were overflowing with petty criminals and thus transportation was seen as a two fold solution. To firstly punish the criminals and to provide much needed labour in colonial endeavours. Australia was chosen after the loss of America because it was feared that the Dutch or the French could claim parts of the continent and the British were afraid of losing it.
The common misconception was that murderers and rapists were sent to Australia but this was rarely the case. Those men who committed these crimes were mostly execute by hanging in Britain and the majority sent to Australia were thieves and forgers.
>Why was transportation so prevalent?
Why not?
- Gets rid of criminals
- Costs less than keeping them locked up
- Provides you with cheap labor
Tbh I'd be all for it today. Shipping crooks to some inhospitable wasteland is a good way to make sure they won't be committing crimes inside of your country any more.
If Germany didn't sign the Armistice in WW1 and the war kept on going and there weren't all the strikes and everything, what would have happened? Would the Britain, France, and the US have been able to conquer all the way to Berlin, or would it have resulted in another prolonged stalemate?
>>2193963
>If Germany didn't sign the Armistice in WW1 and the war kept on going and there weren't all the strikes and everything, what would have happened? Would the Britain, France, and the US have been able to conquer all the way to Berlin,
Easily. By the close of the hundred days offensive, the German army couldn't even retreat ahead of the advancing Entente forces.
You would have gotten mass pocketing and swallowing up of what was left of the German army, and then a rolling up of the countryside. If there's no truce on November, I give the Germans 5 months, tops.
Starting this armchair general thread wrong mate, what if the central powers enhanced their defensive positions on the western front instead of taking some retarded charge that cost them 1 million men and all of A-H?
>>2193963
They were fucked. Remember Austria-Hungary was already crushed when they signed the Armistice.
>neoliberalism is the only way to pros....
fuck off /pol/
>>2193934
>dies
>country instantly becomes a democracy with nobody giving a shit
>>2193934
It is
In prussia, were all citizens required by law to become an apprentice of someone? When reading about people born in prussia there's often a mention of them being required by law to be an apprentice. How did this work? Were there other countries with similar laws? Am I retarded?
You are probably reading about their universal conscription system
>>2193908
Ottoman worked like that also, kids would learn craftmanship etc
>>2193908
Instead of having wagecucking people learned a craft in a personalized relationship between master and apprentice. Most of the West used apprenticeship before the industrial revolution and in parts of the west it hung on a long time.
Edgy jokes aside, do you think there will ever be another crusade?
I'm well aware secularism and atheism have been on the rise in Europe and there aren't as many Christians as there once were.
Do you think protestants/Catholics will ever band together and go on another crusade in the defense of Israel/ attack israel/ attack a different middle eastern nation/ attack their mother country to make her a Christian state again?
Discuss
>>2193886
Europeans/Americans, no. But I could totally see Sub-Sarahan Africans going on a crusade, probably not to the Middle East but against Muslim nations in Africa.
no
Catholic Church has literally no power
by 2100 the entire planet will be atheist (even the sand niggers) and we will be Star trek n shiet
>>2193905
why do you think everyone will be atheist?
>there is an alternative timeline where Strasser becomes fuhrer instead of Hitler and he teams up with Stalin defeating capitalist degeneracy once and for all
god /leftypol/ is really out in force lately
>my fantasy world where being a nazi is socially acceptable
>>2193842
the same one where Trotsky replaces Lenin?
what a shitshow
Was this really used by Croatian fascists to slice the throats of Serbs during WWII?
Looks pretty dull lmao
>>2193807
>falling for serb propaganda
Remember the 750,000, Hrvoje!
If you knew Serbs, you'd know that they don't deserve a sharp knife.
Why is literally EVERY Muslim named Mohammad or some variation of it? I don't think I've ever met an Indian named Rama, or a non-Mexican named Jesus. What's the difference in their culture where they feel no obligation to at least try and think about what they want to call their child?
>>2193725
It's common practice to name at least one child, usually the first born, after Mohammad to show one's piety and to honor the prophet.
>>2193725
>feel no obligation to at least try and think about what they want to call their child?
What? They obviously do it to honor Mohammad. And every culture has a common name, literally how the phrase "GI Joe" came about. Are you going to pick out a name book and try to find the most obscure thing in it to name your kid, or are you going to go for something that is accepted in your culture?
Cmon dude, this is the stupidest anti-islam thread ive ever seen.
why doesn´t YHWH strictly forbids to lie in the Decalogue given to Moses (except the part against false witness)
>>2193664
Taqiya.
>>2193664
The original commandment was not to lie in court. The whole "never lie in any circumstance" was appropriated by the Jews from Zoroastrianism during and after their diaspora in Persia.
>>2193664
Because the Decalogue's purpose is to provide a theological foundation, so to speak, for the rest of the commandments and theology. That's why, for instance, the first "commandment" isn't even a command, rather a statement of "I am the Lord your God".
Lying in and of itself isn't necessarily sinful. Going up to you and spouting nonsense, that the sun rises in the west and sets in the east, or that coal is white, isn't evil. Deceit is (almost always) sinful. Trying to lie to get your neighbor's money isn't inherently more or less sinful than trying to get your neighbor's money by other means.
As it is, you already have foundational commands against people's person (don't murder) and against their possessions (Don't steal). The one about false witness is a societal command, to uphold the strictures of civilization, not a personal one. Quite frankly, it's extraneous for the purpose.
>Europe was so filthy and degenerate in the 19th century that "Rat Catching" was then considered a legitimate full-time occupation.
>>2193497
I mean rats were a problem in cities and we still have exterminators today, I don't see your point, better than letting rats run wild
>>2193497
>Europe was so filthy and degenerate in the middle ages they beer instead of water and had a bath once a year
>>2193497
As opposed to today where pest control is a multi billion dollar industry, with entire local government departments set up specifically to tackle it?
Which traditional culture or empire had the best / most "moral" sense of right and wrong? If you had to live in an ancient land which one would you choose in order to live in a place which was comfortable?
>>2193477
Culture = Western European Middle Ages.
>>2193483
What about the middle ages makes it seem comfortable anon? Seems like alot of people on this board shit on it for how uptight and dirty it was.
(not trying to neg your opinion just curious)
I played skyrim once and it was not comfy AT ALL, so no northern europe.
Is he a modern day Saint Paul?
>>2193434
Of course not Goyim..mmmean OP...
He is an evil EVIL man!
NOT TO MENTION an antisemite!
As my good friend and business associate Varg Vikernes would say "STOP WATCHING BROTHER NATHANAEL"
>>2193434
>Not Protestant
Not Christian
>>2193446
Some people say that I am friends with Jews...
Lets find out..
*10 mins of talking in van later*
In conclusion Jews are not technically Christians so it is definitely the right pagan thing to do what they say.. Just make sure the person you are talking to isnt secretly worshiping jesus or something.. then theeeyyll trick ya! Like they did to the Vikangs :(...
ITT we discuss all things architecture. Post yer favorite styles, questions you have, and anything else.
the city of Liverpool in England has some nice, rather varied architecture
>>2193382
I personally want to know about "storefront" architecture at the moment. Was this grocery store built in the International style? I think it's from the late '50s.
Whats the most shocking contemporary historical discovery?
Idk but im curious about your pic
What is it?
Pompeii. An entire city preserved for 2000 years, granting untold information about the glory Roman Empire, containing tons and tons of dicks, lewd images, eroge, shitposting etc
>>2193344
Gobekli Tepe
Transport jefferson, Hamilton, and Washington to the DC of today. What do they think of contemporary American politics, and recent American history?
They're against it
>>2193315
They like Trump but hate what the country has become. They wonder how America sled so hard into tyranny of the grotesque.
why should it matter?