Was Adorno right about most of the stuff? Can we still have a

>>2192759
I really hope you aren't imlying Adorno had even the tiniest optimism for both capitalism or socialism. Both are enlightenment cuck ideologies.

Honestly Adorno is just secular De Maisre.

>>2192802
Nope but I'm a technologist so to speak so I tend do think that with even more tech progress we can attain enough comfort to start producing authentic art and subsequently again.

I know Adorno thought that technology is just another Enlightenment spook for humans to control ie attain power over nature to easier attain power over humans. Still I remain positive.

File: Adorno.jpg (11KB, 263x350px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 263x350px

>>2192759
>"if we start using technology to allow people to be able to be whatever gender they want, then this will make up for technologies oppressive effects against society"
Was he insane?

>>2192759
>Was Adorno right about most of the stuff?

no. He was a ideologue intellectual in the worst sense of the word who LITERALLY believed that anyone that disagreed with his political views was a mentally ill fascist

Why does he look in pain in every picture?

>>2192759

He was just a deeply and justifiably unhappy man with reach. His aesthetics were generally wrong, which is too bad for him, since his personal life was bound up so much in aesthetics and the arts. oh well.

For an infinitely more intriguing contemporary composer, see Penderecki.

>>2194473

he was a miserable intellectual who coudnnt deal with the idea of his entire ideology being utterly wrong and got butthurt at happy american families buying lawnmowers and toasters in middle class California