Why has the nordic countries population always been so low? It has a cold climate, but the european part of Russia is just as cold and has a Huge population
>>2439396
>but the european part of Russia is just as cold and has a Huge population
eoro part of russia is actually much much colder, and has a larger population because the lands were better for agriculture, also population isn't that much larger
norhtern europe soil is crap compared to theirs
>>2439396
Nordics didnt have that much good farmable land. I think they figured out how to make swamps farmable around the 1700s or 1800s.
>>2439396
You mean the Russia that is mostly inhabited further south than even Denmark is? The only large cities in Russian north are all port cities (St.Petersburg, Arkangelsk and Murmansk).
redpill me on Caesars assassination
Caesar dindu nuffin, the republic was a mistake
>>2439378
kys tyrant lover. If you love despotism you can fuck off to Greece. We trve Romans threw the kings out for a reason.
DO IT AGAIN BRUTUS
Who is more loyalty to Caesar? Octavius or Marc Anthony?
>>2439231
Octavius,octavius didn't betrayed Ceasar.
>>2439231
>Mark "Crowned in Alexandria" Anthony
Literally.
Plot?
>>2439142
What's your favorite animal?
>>2439142
When and where is it set?
Was he right to distrust the Jews?
>>2439127
That's a big moustach
>>2439131
uuuu
>>2439127
He shoulda negged them then sell them Madagascar, concentration camps were bit of an overkill
>tfw read no books for over a month because I read one at a time and the brothers Karamazov is so fucking boring
>read less than 150 books in that time
Reading other people wank over how much philosophical / psychological insight this book has reminds me of what a pseudy exercise literature has become.
This book is horrifically boring. I can't bring myself to read and I'm only at about page 130 out of about 700.
Can someone explain what I'm supposed to get out of this? And if the insights are so profound, what are they? A third question: Is enjoyment ever supposed to be involved?
The cherry on top is that almost nobody would be praising this book if it was written today. And if it was written today and self published then nobody would read it and it would be mocked if it was read (>inb4 you dispute this). This shit would not happen in a medium / art form that wasn't close to death or dead. And I know I'll be mocked for using "enjoyment" (the E word) and that wouldn't happen with a healthy medium either.
>>2439117
This is the most pleb post I've read today. Good job brainlet.
Brothers K was a really good book. Incisive prose, insight on the nature of belief wrapped up in a compelling story.
I liked Crime & Punishment more though just for Rodion. Has anyone read Demons/The Possessed? Does it stack up to his other work?
>>2439117
People are going to call you a pleb for this, but I don't get Dostoevsky either, which is weird because I really like Russian Golden Age lit in general. I struggled through C&P, barely, and I've tried to read Brothers Karamazov in both Russian and English. Couldn't do it. Stopped after like page 300. Maybe there were fantastically insightful things about the human condition on page 301 but I wasn't having fun so I didn't read them.
Your comments about novels/literature in general are going too far though. One, the book is almost a century and a half old. It's survived for a reason. OK, so it's not to our tastes. It's not to most people's tastes, in the 21st century. But clearly people did derive genuine enjoyment from it or it wouldn't have survived quite a few decades during which literature and theater were basically the only games in town. You're also out of your mind if you think that pretentious "if you don't get it you're a moron" wanking is unique to literature -- have you ever fucking BEEN to a film festival? -- and literature isn't "close to death" unless you arbitrarily discount, you know, all of the shit that people do actually enthusiastically read, in which case you're guilty of pretty much the same thing you're railing against.
It's worth noting that Dostoevsky is by no means representative of 19th-century Russian lit even though he's one of its most famous authors. Tolstoy is NOTHING like Dostoevsky, not just in content but also in tone. War and Peace is a pretty fucking good war/adventure story that occasionally dips into philosophy. Tolstoy's writing much livelier and less introspective. There's political intrigue, duels to the death, lots of irresponsible drinking and gambling, adultery and scandalous love affairs, huge battle scenes, etc etc. Ditto for Pushkin's short stories and so on (I suspect you might not enjoy Chekhov though.)
>"judeo-christian values"
>>2439084
What's the problem?
>>2439099
Jewish values and Christian values strongly crash and the only people who push this meme are American Jews and Christian zionists who want to make us think we should somehow be loyal to Jews and Israel.
I've come to the conclusion that radar might be the most important invention of all time. Modern ships and aircraft would never be able to function without it. We'd constantly had planes crashing into each other. Radar also gives us a way to warn people when there is a storm coming through so they can get out of the way. This prevents boats from being caught in storms and it prevents people from being killed by tornadoes.
>>2439026
>What is Penicilin?
nope
thatd be tools to make fire
>radar
>not writing which was literally the moment civilization began
Would you agree that people who were living on island or peninsula had the biggest cultural famosity in humankind?
See italy, britain, japan
no absolutely not
mainlanders are superior to peninsula and island monkeys
germans and frogs are superior to anglos
spanish and portugeese are superior to italians (made up nationality btw)
chinese are superior to japanese
>the french revolution
>german thinkers
>spanish influence over the world
>chinese technology and philosophers
i didnt even need to mention mesopotamia or egypt
>>2438989
>spanish and portugeese
>not living on a peninsula
>>2438989
>italians (made up nationality btw)
>implying all other nationalities aren't just as made up
stay mad Fritz
This might be a bit high-brow for /his/, but here's a philosophical conundrum.
If you could press a button that made you 2 points more attractive on the current tenscale, but made all your peers of your gender 3 points more attractive on the (current) tenscale, would you press it?
If you think you're already as attractive as is possible, indulge the hypothetical scenario and assume there's no ceiling for pretty/handsomeness
>>2438956
Of course
Things can't get much worse for me anyway.
>would you choose an option that will improve your life and the lives of others?
Is this a joke OP?
>>2438956
Attractiveness is relative and assuming the growth is linear it won't help.
It will only help those comparable in attractiveness to me.
So answer to your question is "Yes, I like me some challenge."
I believe that it is not impossible to find soldiers / politicians who would have had some degree of power and achievement by gathering the power of the universal's likes of history.
>>2438849
What the fuck are you talking about?
>mfw in my HoI:III game with Poland I beat Germany then went on to march to Moscow on my own
>mfw in my HoI:II I got slaughtered as Poland by 1938 because I pissed off Germany too much
Teebeehaytch, I don't know which one I have more of a liking for. One is dumb but entertaining, and the other at least tries at being realistic but you basically can't do anything with it but do what happened historically
Many of the people who appear in hoi can not get any information even if we search on google. However, it is only those who are familiar with the history of each country. Then you surely understand.
>Le end of history
Did people seriously believe in this meme in the 90's? It seems so laughably naive now.
>>2438794
What do you mean end of history? Doomsday?
>>2438802
He's talking about Francis Fukuyama
>>2438806
This, it was basically the idea that after the Cold War no major conflicts would happen and the world would slowly transform into a series of happy liberal democracies under US hegemony.
ITT:
Historical figures who did, literally and figuratively, absolutely, totally, NOTHING, (nothing) - a grand total of ZERO (0) - wrong.
Pic FUCKING related, those wewuzromansandsheeeeeeeitt, Latin-massacring, heretical and pederastic LARPers in Greece got EVERYTHING (∞) they deserved.
>>2438764
The perfidious $$$Venetian$$$ strikes again!
>>2438764
Romans did nothing wrong
Latin Massacre best day of my lfie
I agree. Without the collapse of Byzantium, there would be no Renaissance. Venice dindu nuffin.
What are the greatest last stands in history?
Remember the Alamo, Anon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGPBLkZggXI
And it doesn't meet the 25 year rule but Randy Shughart and Gary Gordon in Operation Gothic Serpent is a hella a last stand.
Keeping the Ottoman army on the wrong side of the mountains, while sieging their castles on the right side of it. Underrated battle, when you consider the consequences. Perhaps Britain/France/Germany would've attacked Russia if the Ottomans managed to get through and fight on even grounds.
>>2438640
>Surrender! You guys are out of food.
>That's where you're wrong, kiddo.
Does the US have any founding mothers?
>>2438630
dont let the sjw see this
>>2438630
Thomas Jefferson plagiarized the constitution from his black female slave Sally Hemings
The official start to the feminist movement that continues into today.
As abolition of slavery was primarily championed by the church groups of New England women, they eventually splintered off into movements where they pursued the same rights for themselves as they supported for black men.