This might be a bit high-brow for /his/, but here's a philosophical

>>2438956
Of course

Things can't get much worse for me anyway.

>would you choose an option that will improve your life and the lives of others?

Is this a joke OP?

>>2438956
Attractiveness is relative and assuming the growth is linear it won't help.

It will only help those comparable in attractiveness to me.

So answer to your question is "Yes, I like me some challenge."

>>2438985
>improve your life
only if you live in a vacuum. You'd be relatively uglier than you were before. You'd only be more attractive in an absolute sense.

>>2438956
Assume I've 8 points and everyone else in the world has 9 points, I'd still push it so I had 11 and everyone else 12.
Same if I had 1 points and everyone else 9 points, me ending up with 3 points and everyone else 11.

The only reason anyone wouldn't do it was because they didn't see it as fair and as such wouldn't do it out of spite.

There's a psychological experiment related to this where 2 people are asked to share 100 dollars. One person will say a number only once, and the other one can either accept it or refuse it. If he refuse, no one gets anything.

A lot of people will split it 50/50 even if the rational thing for the one deciding the sum would be to give himself 99 dollars while the other one gets 1 dollar. The rational thing would be to accept it since 1 is more than 0 yet a lot of people refuse because they don't find it fair.

>>2439009
Not comparable.
A more fair equivalence is if you pushed a button and EVERYONE ELSE got 200 dollars, and you got 100 dollars. You'd objectively be poorer because of the inflation/adjustment of value.

File: nootka.png (11KB, 631x105px)

11KB, 631x105px

>>2438956
>gender

Oh, yes...

>>2438956
definitely not
i'd say i am 8/10 while the average person is 5/10
then i become 10/10 but everyone else is 8/10
not good

put it this way : it's better to be good-looking in a world of ugly people, than great-looking in a world of handsome people