Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 39. page

File: DSC_0593-2.jpg (918KB, 1200x798px) Image search: [Google]

918KB, 1200x798px

What makes a good "childrens photo"? plenty of parent in the east and west willing to pay for amazing photos of their kids right?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Photographer	Andrew Evans
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	836
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	200 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:10 20:14:39
Exposure Time	1/2500 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	200.00 mm
Comment	(C)Andrew Evans
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-11 at 21.01.46.png (659KB, 2016x830px) Image search: [Google]

659KB, 2016x830px

How do we end this?

File: IMG_20170811_135951.jpg (61KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1280x853px

Hey /p/, I want to bounce this idea off you. It's about making digital images look like they were taken on film.

1. Get an image with every color in it. I mean every color. Something like

>[(red, green, blue) for red in range(256) for green in range(256) for blue in range(256)]

2. Every time I get a new roll of film, take a picture of that rainbow image. Keep the light and all the camera settings constant.

3. Take the same picture with a digital camera. Again, use all the same settings and light.

4. Find the linear mapping between the film picture and the digital picture. For every pixel value, there should be a corresponding value that you can multiply it by to get it's twin.

This way, instead of relying on generalities like "fuji has cooler greens", we know exactly how much to move each green by to make a digital picture look like a fuji.

Potential problems:

1. Finding a printer or monitor that can render every color I need. Costco or my little dell monitor might not cut it.

2. There might not be a linear relationship. Like, maybe a particular red changes differently when it's next to a blue vs when it's next to a green because of some quirk in the film chemistry. I can't think of a way to detect or handle this, and I'm not even sure it's really a problem.

What do you think? Does any of this sound reasonable to you?

File: street-photographer[1].jpg (105KB, 950x630px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 950x630px

So I was talking to a friend who just got back from a doing an overseas shoot in Asia. He was telling me that a problem they had when doing street shoot was other photographers invading his shoot to take pictures of the models he paid and one even knocked over two daylight floods breaking one. This was in Hong Kong and when the translator started to ask for the guys information he just ran off. In places like Shenzhen there was as many as 8 people with DSLRs using flash and getting in the shot. Even with paid handlers these guys were so relentless they had to end the shoot early.

I've been to different conventions and have noticed if anyone poses for a shot theres sometimes someone who takes a shot from over my shoulder but they're pretty polite about it not getting in my shot or using flash.

Have any of you experienced people like this when you street shoot or is it just an Asian city thing to be an asshole by ruining someones job?

File: iHmhQc6.png (525KB, 433x680px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 433x680px

>have to shoot an interview today
>room was dark
>missed focus

File: IMG_6728.jpg (118KB, 750x933px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 750x933px

One of my photos from my trip to Alaska last year. Been doing amateur photography for awhile now, so I'm not new to it. Thoughts, /p/?

File: Kiev88.jpg (133KB, 600x444px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 600x444px

>soviet cameras are well build thanks
TOP KEK!

Try to refute this, kurwa.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEBMssU7CZw

I almost buy this hasselbladisky fucker.

File: 666-canon-eos-5d-mark1-1_1343743934.jpg (60KB, 666x521px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 666x521px

Ive been thinking about buying a used full frame canon since ive realized most of my current lenses will already fit. Older versions come quite cheap, actually on Ebay.

Got any recomendations? So far Ive looked at the 5D mark 1, is that worth it?

File: dYolTr3.jpg (339KB, 2759x4310px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 2759x4310px

I'm looking for some ideas for shooting nude portraits in creative ways.

Post the best you got.

File: nikond700_front.jpg (132KB, 1280x1000px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1280x1000px

Hello /p/

My Nikon D700 died the other day. Completely dead, nothing happens when I try to turn it on. And now I find myself quite conflicted regarding what to replace it with. Ideally cost wouldn't be an issue and I'd simply get myself a D750 and something more portable for travelling.
I'm currently in the process of selling my old D3200 and some gear I don't really use (24mm AIS, 8mm fisheye, 35mm DX). Kept it for so long because of nostalgia and I thought I'd use it to video my son (born summer 2016), but carrying two cameras along as well as switching cameras is simply too cumbersome, so I barely have.
If it weren't for my need to have video, the choice would be simple as I'm generally quite satisfied with the Nikon D700 for stills.

Right now I'm leaning towards buying a new D610, but concern about its autofocus, viewfinder and handling have me hesistant, as well as the fact that it isn't THAT much cheaper than the D750. How do both these cameras compare to the D700 in these regards?

Any advice or insight would be appreciated.

Background: Got my first DSLR, a Nikon D3200 in early 2013. Enjoyed it immensely but I soon grew frustrated with the tiny viewfinder, handling and slow autofocus. Bought a used Nikon D700 in February 2016, abused it in Svalbard a little but generally taken good care of it. 145000 exposures when I got it, 150000 now. I also have a Nikon F90 and FM2 I use semi-regularly (the cost of film and development hold me back).

File: images (13).jpg (20KB, 521x282px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 521x282px

powershot g15, what can this camera do?

File: IMG_20170729_0002.jpg (131KB, 620x992px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 620x992px

Instax from Taiwan

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	CanoScan LiDE 220
Camera Software	IJ Scan Utility
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017/07/29 11:36:54
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	620
Image Height	992

File: 1A-16mm5[1].jpg (531KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 1920x1080px

What focal length should I use if I want my pictures to look like movies?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2013:09:14 14:18:15
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1080

File: image.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

Tell me what I did wrong and right.

File: Image (5).jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

I'll use it for adobe lightroom, premiere and aftereffects
I don't need super speed, just everything works good
Any suggests? I've found just shit in physical shop

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 4S
Camera Software	6.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2012:10:23 19:39:50
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Brightness	0.2 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.28 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard