>"Loganberry Books in Ohio has reorganised its fiction section so all titles by male writers now have their spines facing the wall"
>"A sign in front of the display says: “Illustrating the fiction gender gap … we’ve silenced male authors, leaving works of women in view.”"
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/mar/08/womens-history-month-promotion-sees-bookshop-silence-mens-voices
What now white boi?
I don't get what's the intent. It just underlines that women are producing less literature despite largely preferring humanities.
oh look more gender bait.
i'm really outraged.
>>9208401
This is just bad business lol
Im looking for the book that depicted pic related. Its called "Was earth visited by aliens?"
It apparently comes from the 60s and seemingly dissappeared completely and cant be bought anywhere.
Allegedly the photograph was seen in the American Museum of Natural History
So I'm in search of any information about the book, the other content, author etc.
Maybe some of you have it in thei shelf or seen it. Im happy about every piece of information
>>9208215
What do you want to know?
>>9208241
as much as possible. who wrote it, what the official reason is that you cant find it anywhere, what the author said about the book, what other themes the book is about.
>>9208252
Maybe it just failed to sell past it's niche audience of shizos and subsequently disappeared in a time where information was disorganized and uncatalogued before being picked up again in the eccentric annals of internet theorists desperate to blame anything unpopular on a universal conspiracy and not a lack of basic evidence.
Or maybe the Jews hid it.
>Kwix-Oh-Tic
>HEGGLE
>>9208198
This guy says Heggle
what could be behind a secret passageway that only opens at 3:06 am?
>>9207326
Narnia
Case dismissed
>>9207340
less trampled out
case reopened
idk, jews probably
"Such inactivity, however, is by no means emancipated from
productive activity: it remains in thrall to that activity, in an uneasy and worshipful subjection to
production's needs and results; indeed it is itself a product of the rationality of production. There
can be no freedom apart from activity, and within the spectacle all activity is banned a corollary
of the fact that all real activity has been forcibly channeled into the global construction of the
spectacle. So what is referred to as "liberation from work," that is, increased leisure time, is a
liberationneitherwithinlaboritselfnorfrom theworldlaborhasbroughtintobeing."
Where the fuck is the justification for this? Is this the typical Marxist claim that reaping the benefits of the system solidifies it's grasp over us?
>liberty is oppression
yep, it's marxism
liberationneitherwithinlaboritselfnorfrom theworldlaborhasbroughtintobeing
>>9207205
Language of the spectacle? Dude was onto sth
>People go to Academia to be taught something over four years they could learn in 6 months of self-study
Is this some kind of a joke?
>>9206191
No, but this thread is
>>9206191
>people go to college in America
>ISHIDDYDIGGY
>>9206191
>self-study
That's the joke
In your best prose, write a love letter confessing your love to the woman you secretly admire.
>>9206127
I wish I could feel the heat of anything.
>>9206127
>Would you like to get a strawberry phosphate with me down at the ice cream parlor? It's okay if you say no. Just wondering.
Greetings cunt let's have a fuck
Fantasy
Selected:
>https://i.imgur.com/r688cPe.jpg
General:
>https://i.imgur.com/igBYngL.jpg
Flowchart:
>https://i.imgur.com/uykqKJn.jpg
Science Fiction
Selected:
>https://i.imgur.com/A96mTQX.jpg
>https://i.imgur.com/IBs9KE8.jpg
General:
>https://i.imgur.com/r55ODlL.jpg
>https://i.imgur.com/gNTrDmc.jpg
NPR's Top 100 Science Fiction & Fantasy Books:
>https://i.imgur.com/IJxTQBL.jpg
Previous Threads:
>>9189440
>>9180806
>>9168106
>>9156349
>>9141959
>>9132584
>>9114658
Which sff novels have the most gratuitous scenes of emotionally scarring cuckoldry?
Gene Wolfe is objectively the goat sff writer.
>>9202223
Pirate Freedom was disappointing. He completely skipped over the best parts of the premise.
if i enjoy the works from tao lin and other alt-lit writers. what "serious" authors should i check out?
i fucking hate tao lin shills
>>9210106
What the fuck is "alt-lit"?
Why does everything have to be "alt" now?
Tao confirmed two new books coming. Prepare for epic shilling.
What's this board opinion on trying to write prose as if it were poetrhy?
Is it patrician?
Give some examples of prose you consider to be poetry.
>>9210067
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Spleen_de_Paris
>>9210067
Joyce's letters to Nora
>I've, we've, you've, etc
>words
>>9209964
'its book'
book fucks me up the most
just because 'it's' is already taken for 'it is'
>its
Would it be possible to generate a mood, using the descriptive writing in the novel, that is so atmospheric and individual that it can rival the mood generated by music?
How much of an experience someone has had looking at a view can be transferred into a novel?
>>9209884
Nope. Literature works on the cognitive level, which is a more sophisticated but less immediate cerebral function than emotion.
Not denying that literature can induce rapture, but music will get you there quicker. It's direct emotional stimulation.
Also, if you like Harmonia, check out Cluster.
>>9209884
>Yes
>Impossible to answer
>>9210041
>Would it be possible to generate a mood,
Even if you attempt to generate your mood, people will not always feel the same way.
>using the descriptive writing in the novel, that is so atmospheric and individual that it can rival the mood generated by music?
Certainly. It's just that compared to Music, it is a direct connection to a sensory node (your ears). Writing requires more processing to fully enjoy as easily as a movie or music. You have to cook your own food whereas something that appeals simply to once auditory senses is equivalent to driving-thru and ordering what you want.
Is there a place to learn the rules of poetrhy?
or some course online for free to learn to write poetrhy?
www.4chan.org/lith
>>9209859
free form is the way to go
>>9209859
just
I didn't get it.
>>9209827
Try reading it from the books perspective.
you have to be a lovely girl to understand
>>9209877
>lovely
Alice was an annoying whore
Why do newer philosophers always get off scot-free when they butcher older philosopher's arguments.
They know taken as a whole their predecessor's work most of the time just by itself contradicts their vapid counterarguments.
But they just act as if it's not there or assume a priori their take is simply "better" and "that's that".
Why is this allowed?
You finally feel confident that you understand one guy but then the next one just goes around putting words in their mouths, quote mining or making a superficial or misrepresentational criticism which can easily be countered simply by pointing to relevant counterarguments in the work itself.
Guess I'm too high IQ for philosophy or something.
Feels bad man.
why do philosophers come here to argue, when they'd be more at home in /pol/?
>>9209786
I would be offended if someone call me a philosopher.