Do extroverted people have a sound internal mind? When I talk to extroverted people, it seems they say whatever that comes to their mind without much internalization. This leads to situations where these extroverted people do not mean what they say or do not understand what they say. They do not seem to take care in the use of language to convey what they mean.
As an introvert and after talking to some other introverts, it seems like whatever we say always has to meet the rational criteria before we actually say it. Things that don't make sense in our mind just doesn't come out. (Now this isn't to say what makes sense in our mind is right, but rather whatever comes out of an introvert's mouth usually seem to make perfect sense to an introvert and has a concrete basis of their usage of the words/language to convey what they mean.) In contrast, the extroverts I've argued with throws meaningless things in hopes of something sticking. Its like they're playing some sort of darts game where they're just throwing random things that matches what's being argued. This doesn't seem to apply to normal conversation as they are more fluid and can go from one sentence to another as if they're simply repeating words types by a professional.
What do you make of this?
I just label them as either normies or people who might be normies.
>>2837340
>What do you make of this?
1) you talk to a lot of retarded people
2) you're pretty dumb yourself for thinking it has something to do with introversion vs extroversion, as there are numerous very extroverted people who can make coherent arguments that make sense to themselves.
Ridiclous, choosing the right words is a prerequisite of any social situation, sometimes the right words to choose are not the ones the convey some sort of a "rational" opinion but rather more playful word games at times even nonsencial, socilizing is about communitcating and grasping the situation, not a medium to shower your opinions on every one, what you call introvertion is basically a retardation arising from an inability to understand the subtle dynamics of social situations.
What is beauty?
a male youth
what is a youth? impetuous fire
>>2837064
you say that as if it were a bad thing
beauty is youth, and youth is beauty
the light of all life is youth, nothing is greater than it
Islam has never produced anything notable to socie-
>>2837023
Indians did that
>>2837023
Those are Hindus, but things such as the algorithm and some medicine improvements belonged to Muslims
You do know that Islam is a relatively recent religion and only goes back to 600 a.d. right?
So Hitler never mentioned blacks or 'whites' in any sort in his writings/speeches/rantings, correct? He was esseintially anti-jewish and anti-slav and the whole anti-black is an american appropriation of nazi """"teachings""" correct?
>>2836986
no the whole American "anti black thing" existed long before Hitler was born. Are you retarded?
the titmice belong with other titmice
>>2836986
jessie owen
hitler did not want to shake his hand because he was black and called him a cheating nigger since niggers are superior to aryan in coon sports such as running
How does it feel knowing that you're all going head first into the ovens AND you deserve it?
The greatest mistake of the common man's analysis of history is that Hitler was a pied piper who seduced the German people and destroyed their country. On the contrary, Hitler and his ideology were the ultimate expression of everything German. Inside the heart of every individual belonging to the so called German race is a ruthless, paranoid, insecure, self pitying totalitarian pervert whose means of compensating is projecting the collective insecurities of his people onto whatever the supposed "other" was convenient for him at the time, in this case the Jews. The German ideology is not positive. It does not build, but only seeks to destroy. What these barbarians do not understand is that if they had their way and all the "degenerates" were gone they would be left to themselves. These sorry excuses for human beings would be cold, afraid, empty inside, and have no one to blame. Truly a horrifying fate.
https://youtu.be/4ztOV2wrrkY
Leave Russia to me.
Nobody has ever invaded Russia and won.
What's the point in conquering Russia it's a big poverty zone?
>>2836832
He defeated the Russian army, he just didn't think Russians would stoop down to burning Moscow just to not let his troops winter there
Why does Anglo-American (mostly the latter) political and cultural discourse focus so much on the individual or family unit and so little on the society as a whole? The individual-as-atom thought process dominates both left and right--cultural liberals are obsessed with self-affirmation of invented identities and their stance on everything (except gun control) amount to "if you don't like x don't do it!". The American right subscribes to an absurd, asocial variant of free-market capitalism while assuring themselves that private charity will somehow work better than social security, while American evangelicals (who are spreading their filth to the good people of Africa and Latin America) treat Christianity as a *personal relationship* with Christ. What arrogance.
>>2836693
In America the private sphere is everything now. They just can't into Big Concepts anymore.
>>2836693
of course private charity is successful fool, just look at that birth rate in Africa
>>2836693
Because society is an artificial construction made up of many people you don't give a fuck about and are begrudgingly forced to cooperate with and pay taxes to and the government that represents it doesn't give a fuck about you either and would gladly fuck you over it had the chance.
The left-right political spectrum seems utterly bizarre to me. The definitions of "left wing" and "right wing" change so much depending on the area, time, and context. It feels almost meaningless. Is it really worth keeping up this extremely outdated concept? I'm so tired of reading articles about some "right wing agenda" or "left wing viewpoint". How about actually describing WHAT they believe instead of just labeling it on some useless, sporadic spectrum that no one can even agree upon?
Going by what it meant in its original usage (French revolutionary politics), it roughly amounts to equality versus hierarchy.
It's beyond stupid. I'm in favor of a lot of what many people would consider to be socialist programs (healthcare, contraceptive services, drug treatment, etc...) but am also firmly in favor of a "republican" immigration policy. But I can't have that apparently
>>2836646
I learned at school that hitler was on the right and everyone on the right is a Nazi
and my dad taught me that stalin was on the left and everyone on the left is a communist
and /his/ taught me ideology doesn't come in 2 genders its more of a spectrum like what Bill Nye the science guy says
WTF
>>2836645
KEK
COMMUNISTS CONFIRMED GAY
>>2836645
The derrida looking guy in the background is like "l-lewd..."
>>2836661
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_fraternal_kiss
Why do the Jews do this to us?
Why was homosexuality so common among the Ottomans? You have these old images depicting Turks fucking each other and then stories of sultans keeping little boys around their palaces. Even Mehmet Fetih kept Vlad the Impaler's brother around as his personal fuck toy. Then you have the Tanzimat Reforms in the 1800s which legalised gay sex loooooooong before Europe got around to it.
Anyway what was with the Ottomans and loving cock? Would like some Turkish scholars to enlighten me.
>>2836619
you will find that acceptance of homosexuality is always present in decaying empires
>>2836699
It was present in Turkey long before it started to decay.
>>2836619
Steppe invaders like Seljuks just kept personal sex slaves and harems, this was combined with Iranian culture of homosexuality and plenty of slaves Ottomans had thanks to steady supply brought by corsairs and tatars. Result is that.
Are there any ethnic Russians left?
If so, are there any countries in which they are the ethnic majority as opposed to a >1% figure as I presume they now exist in Russia?
(Referring to pre-Bolshevik genocide era)
Who do you think lives in Russia right now?
<1% *
>>2836471
Descendants of Jewish Bolsheviks?
>It's an American 'History and Culture' thread
>>2836224
My country is an abomination yes, furthermore I hope Chyna fucks this country over. I want to flee away.
>>2836240
The former woman wrestler poses no threat. And as a frogposter, good riddance.
>it's a "European Grasp at Relevancy" Episode
>be surrounded by 2 massive oceans
>get invaded and almost totally genocided over the next century
What went wrong?
>>2836106
Dirty white apes sailed over and brought disease and rape.
>>2836106
Lack of domesticated animals and large settlements which meant they had little immunity to infectious viruses from the old world
>>2836108
>have a bunch of horses
>kill them all
what did they mean by this?
How did such powerful earth shaking nation's become so irrelevant?
>>2836073
Because they didn't give a shit about much of anything, only exacting tribute from conquered peoples
>>2836073
They are inland so they are fucked.
Let's talk about ancient fedoras. Who was the biggest and the cringiest one?
>>2836037
If anything ancient Christians were contrarian fedoras
>>2836049
> imagine walking to a Roman official and telling him gods don't exist
> everyone is cringing and telling you to stop being an idiot and go away
> you scream autistically and keep denying the existence of gods
> poor officials have to waste their time to put you down
Gorgias.