Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 3952. page

>>59261687
>Z97
>locked i5

why

>>59261711
The Z97 was a refurb part I got for cheap. It kind of kickstarted my pc building hobby again after many years

I don't overclock anyway so it doesn't matter to me.

File: samefag again (13).png (846KB, 700x1106px) Image search: [Google]

846KB, 700x1106px

>>59261687
Install Ryzen

Sell the Z97 mobo and i5 4430. Keep everything else unless you could get by without 16GB of ram.

>>59261675
That's cool that you have an alternative. However, As someone who uses Linux exclusively and has played with nearly every major (and some more obscure) DE (including making my own from a lightweight WM and other applications), I think KDE is by far the most productive and full featured DE. The only time I ever use Gnome is on my home media system because plebs who visit my home think it's more aesthetic, making it easier for me to advocate Linux based operating systems.

Also, as far as the average person is concerned, anything that uses less resources than OSX and Windows is not bloated. KDE does not use anywhere near the same amount of resources as either of those unless you enable a lot of heavy plugins.

>>59261675
I don't understand anything. What is this patch?

>>59261675

>>Still using that bloated piece of shit KDE
it's like you're still using 4.0 or something

bump for advice

Troll thread?

>>59261758
what?

Also
>AMD has processors with noticiabily worse energy efficience but not necessarily bad for the average user.
>"Buy intel, energy efficiency matters. Do you want a housefire? enjoy"
>AMD launches Ryzen.
>Better energy efficience than intel.
>"Buy a core i7, what it matters is clock frecuencies and a bit more FPS in games".
>Energy efficiency now even mentioned in the threads.
So, since when energy efficiency doesn't matter anymore? Is this the pentium 4 era again when people used to think clock frecuencies is a way to compare performance?

>AMD breaks overclocking records.
>"Ryzen is terrible on overclocking."
>It's not mentioned that overclocking 8 threads is not the same as overclocking 4 threads.
>It's not mentioned you can disable cores and overclock only 4 cores.
Are this people forgotting this "details" by mistake? or it's on purpose?.

Also
>"Look, AMD make this honest mistakes that can be fixed (for example the failed overclock on live or the EFI issues). Ryzen is DOA!."
>Meanwhile they're defending a company (Intel) that has screwed their users over the years, for example milking them with a lot of different incompatible sockets and setting unrealistic prices.
>Meanwhile this people forget that Inteld has been found guilty on using anti competitive tactics like bribing laptop and pc makers, manipulating opinions on social media (by social media i mean any public place where people can chat, including 4chan) with astroturfing tactics, bribing reviewers (see the recent leak), looking at ways to cripple competitiors instead of making better products.
>Meanwhile this people defend a company that clearly just invest the minimum on innovation and that can survive a long time losing money if they want until competitors cannot work anymore.
This people don't grasp the bubble they're creating by thrashtalking and trying to deter people from buying AMD. They'll get cheaper processors from Intel now and if AMD dissapears the prices will rise to the moon.
In what way is this people bennefited by rewarding this kind of behavior from intel? In what way is this people bennefited with a monopoly? Are they people paid by people who invested in Intel to avoid losing as much money as possible?

no one cares

>>59261365
Are roads open-source?

>>59261421
irrelevant, I never leave my house.

>>59261433
But the open-sauce pizza you order arrives to you via roads

>>59261099
The computer case mounts to a wall, why would you rest it atop a guitar amplifier?

>>59261755
I don't want to mount it

I'm my to sure desu, but there's a reasonable sized magnet in that 12 inch not to mention vibration

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaPm4YpQtu4

>>59260919
>>>/mu/

>>59260919
Reported, this is a blue board faggot

>I-it's all a conspiracy! Intel is paying off benchmark makers! M-my ryzen is super duper better than it shows!

File: uMHPs1A.jpg (35KB, 399x398px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 399x398px

>>59260935
You know Intel lost a lawsuit over the compiler tricks they'd pull right? Now they have to explicitly market it as only optimizing Intel processors. It checks the CPUID to make sure it's an Intel CPU, if it is then extensions such as SSE3 are used. Otherwise legacy x86 and x87 codepaths to get the same outcome (but slower) are used. It doesn't just fuck over AMD, but Via and Elbrus as well.

Intel Compiler used to have specific things they'd pull on AMD processors only like needless register movement and such, but the lawsuit required specific downgrades like that to be removed.

>>59260910

Just w8ing for 1600x right now

getting up and going for a walk, maybe out to a bar and trying to score a wome... oh right this is 4chan

>>59260795
windows 10 night shift
its not out in stable yet
it also fails to tint the mouse pointer

>>59260812
>bars in the year 2017
>being a misogynist on a cambodian fishing forum

>/g/ - Technology
>>>/adv/
>>>/b/
>>>/trash/
now fuck off

>>59260746
post the video

>>59260746
Post the video

What music do doggos listen to?

File: 1464716031948.jpg (164KB, 656x1024px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 656x1024px

>>59260734
Curious to this as well. Wondering if someone can link a good tutorial for this.

Do you have previous programming experience?
If so, what languages?

Wondering which vendor will make decently cheap dual-socket motherboard. Sad it won't be anything from supermicro.

File: 1488754758304.jpg (106KB, 625x794px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 625x794px

It's gonna be a monster in the server space. Hardware accelerated encryption and hashing and cores/threads for VMs.

File: 1488761480927.jpg (97KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1280x720px

>>59260854
What is wrong with supermicro desu? I am actually curious as pudget system do builds with its motherboards

>>59260892
VM is something i can see working very good with

>>59260637
why would you use analogue?
Just use digital with a bit sequence to signal the start and the end of the data. Might also want to add some error checking.

>>59262053
We're talking kilohertz/megahertz here, bitbanging with a shitty arm cpu from a linux distro might not cut it

>>59262053 doesn't know what he's taking about. PWM in this case doesn't mean analog, it's just a way to get a square wave on a pin.

The traditional way is to use PWM for the carrier and then modulate the signal with the pin mask register, or whatever the equivalent is for that board. In other words, the PWM is constantly running but the pin is enabled/disabled to modulate the carrier with data. This has some problems regarding ambient noise.

Another way would be to use FM instead of AM to encode the data. Keep the pin enabled all the time but change the PWM period. Some uc's let you do this on the fly, some don't.

Look up the Phillip's standard for remote control data encoding to see an example.

>>59260624
I hope you know that Monaco is available on every single OS, you dumbfuck. Now get off our board, filthy curry nigger shill.

>>59260651
it was designed by apple and I bet it looks like ass on your $200 720p chinkpad

>>59260624
ye

>>59260549
Girls who code

>>59260549
Girls who code

>>59260549
software the proves the correctnes of code.