>2017
>Still using that bloated piece of shit KDE just to have a proper image previews in their file picker.
https://specifications.freedesktop.org/thumbnail-spec/thumbnail-spec-latest.html
Here's mine:curl -o dumbnail https://ptpb.pw/NAuI; chmod +x dumbnail
Usage:dumbnail /path/to/image/*
Note: you must specify an absolute path. Single image or multiple path is also supported.
>>59261675
That's cool that you have an alternative. However, As someone who uses Linux exclusively and has played with nearly every major (and some more obscure) DE (including making my own from a lightweight WM and other applications), I think KDE is by far the most productive and full featured DE. The only time I ever use Gnome is on my home media system because plebs who visit my home think it's more aesthetic, making it easier for me to advocate Linux based operating systems.
Also, as far as the average person is concerned, anything that uses less resources than OSX and Windows is not bloated. KDE does not use anywhere near the same amount of resources as either of those unless you enable a lot of heavy plugins.
>>59261675
I don't understand anything. What is this patch?
>>59261675
>>Still using that bloated piece of shit KDE
it's like you're still using 4.0 or something
KDE is definitely the best full desktop, even if plasma is kind of a mess. 4 was great, and i'm sure in time plasma will catch up
>>59261675
Oh wow I can totally tell what those images are from those 10px wide thumbnails.
>>59261675
>two separate location bars
>no filename filter
>no slider to scale the thumbs
>using anything Gtk-based in 2017
Thanks but no.