Suggestion for Ryzen benchmarking

Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 6

Anonymous
Suggestion for Ryzen benchmarking 2017-03-06 02:29:01 Post No. 59260910
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 1488765631165.png (375KB, 1228x1094px) Image search: [Google]

Suggestion for Ryzen benchmarking Anonymous 2017-03-06 02:29:01 Post No. 59260910 [Report]

This one is for gaymers. Before running the software you want to benchmark, patch out the intel compiler "cheat":

http://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/Patchers/Intel-Compiler-Patcher.shtml

This will give you a shock when you find out Intel has been deliberately slowing down their competition.

Anonymous 2017-03-06 02:30:19 Post No.59260935
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-06 02:30:19 Post No.59260935 [Report]

>I-it's all a conspiracy! Intel is paying off benchmark makers! M-my ryzen is super duper better than it shows!

Anonymous 2017-03-06 03:51:46 Post No.59261995
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-03-06 03:51:46 Post No.59261995 [Report]

File: uMHPs1A.jpg (35KB, 399x398px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 399x398px

>>59260935
You know Intel lost a lawsuit over the compiler tricks they'd pull right? Now they have to explicitly market it as only optimizing Intel processors. It checks the CPUID to make sure it's an Intel CPU, if it is then extensions such as SSE3 are used. Otherwise legacy x86 and x87 codepaths to get the same outcome (but slower) are used. It doesn't just fuck over AMD, but Via and Elbrus as well.

Intel Compiler used to have specific things they'd pull on AMD processors only like needless register movement and such, but the lawsuit required specific downgrades like that to be removed.

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:06:55 Post No.59262143
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:06:55 Post No.59262143 [Report]

>>59260910

Just w8ing for 1600x right now

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:08:35 Post No.59262158
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:08:35 Post No.59262158 [Report]

>>59260910

>AMD pays people to shill for them (confirmed)
>somehow AMD Fags pretend Intel is the one paying people

rly meks u fink

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:11:08 Post No.59262182
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:11:08 Post No.59262182 [Report]

>>59262158
>AMD pays people to shill for them (confirmed)

>what we can see in /g/ is exactly the opposite

oy vey antisemite!

sageinallfields 2017-03-06 04:18:57 Post No.59262250
[Report]

sageinallfields 2017-03-06 04:18:57 Post No.59262250 [Report]

>>59262182

pajeet .. hows the weather in bangalore?!! i think your reading comprehension needs some work! AMD Boss will be mad with you!!

It has been confirmed as of yesterday that AMD pays people to shill for them. Intel does not. Stay salty you fucking lunatic AMD Fan Shill hahaha.

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:22:12 Post No.59262286
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:22:12 Post No.59262286 [Report]

>>59262250
>hahaha

Go back to kikebook, Schlomo.

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:27:01 Post No.59262340
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:27:01 Post No.59262340 [Report]

>>59262250
Your English is even more disgustingly incorrect than the man you replied to... Now who is the real shill here?

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:34:05 Post No.59262413
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:34:05 Post No.59262413 [Report]

>>59262158
>AMD pays people to shill for them (confirmed)
This fake, amd dont have money to pay
second amdfag do it for free

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:37:12 Post No.59262451
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-06 04:37:12 Post No.59262451 [Report]

>>59260910
>>59261995
>Using an Intel compiler on a non-Intel chip and expecting everything to be fine
Wow, who fucking knew. Do gamertards realize more than one compiler exists for x86 chips?
>>59262182
>>what we can see in /g/ is exactly the opposite
I see Ryzen getting most of the hype and shill threads.