Serious question, guys. Would this Y-32 Xi'an (from the game Arma 3 Apex) work in real life? I mean, it's a bit complicated for a VTOL/Plane with such a wingspan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnnW8KF5C8o
maybe, but it is designed to look cool not be optimal
>>8630528
So how would you improve it to make it optimal?
>>8630536
emdrive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XF7DPveRuGY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4faZx2TWsL4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_308KNAuFkg
The four year old girls didn't had much time to train given their age.
Yet they are surprisingly good to say at least.
Is there a way to go again in that state of mind when you are a child?
I've already read about the critical period, drugs, meditation, etc...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhy%C4%81na_in_Buddhism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_period
Kids have an opportunity window in which they can learn absolute pitch.
After that window it becomes substantially impossible to develop the skill.
I wonder what kind of wiring we missed not doing mathematics at young age.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grapheme-color_synesthesia#Experiences_and_reports
[math]\mathbb{B}[/math]ump.
>>8629210
I always feel shitty for not having this. It's like I have to do double the work those people have to do. Also, my sister has this and is completely shit in maths
physics graduate
Hi. I made my first YT video on this topic. I'd appreciate any feedback :)
https://youtu.be/kMjatLsmO6E
>>8633000
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsBT5EQt348&t=1s
You sound like a turbocuck.
>>8633000
population in developed countries is stable
especially when abortion is legal
as soon as it stops being economically benificial to hab kid, pop stabalizes
if india n chiner n the rest were developed
we might just stay kewl
that being said our current growth is still p big problem
Is actuarial Science a meme? Passed my first two exams pretty easily as an applied math major...
>>8632868
Yes, but you will just have the average salary of an Actuary starting and will have it like that if you aren't a Jew, really.
But y'know Actuarial Science is just Applied Math in business, so if you really want more rigorous shit on Actuarial Science, either do all the exams and earn 150k/year by becoming a fellow or something OR do research in Mathematical Finance and work for Wall St by the same salary as a Actuary fellow.
tl;dr Math makes you go to the 1% and 300k meme is kind of real since if the CEOs of big companies did a Math degree, they would've easily graduate from it with honors.
Also I hope you don't get into Pure Math since it's like being a Philosophy undergrad but """smarter""".
>>8632904
Also I'm really asleep so, sorry for my shit typing.
>>8632868
>is x a meme
fuck off with these stupid threads faggot
HURRR IS IS LE MEME IS IT A EMEME HEEHEHEHEHE XD
fucking redditor
In a previous thread of mine I had shared my thought on how before the big bang occurred out Mr universe may have been zero dimensional having no size and it suddenly crated 3 new spacial dimensions this allowing 2 dimensional meter to exist. But I hear fewer and fewer people who know little to nothing about the spacial dimensions beyond our own 3 dimensional view. If you don't know 4 spacial dimensions creates duration, where every point of the past can be viewed almost as if the universe is recording everything. And 5 dimensional space is probablity, every time where every outcome is possible and can be viewed by a anyone, that is saying there are 5th dimensional creatures that is. This leads to probability, I believe our universe is SUB 5th dimensional meaning we are a 3 dimensional outcome of a probability, and there are infinite number of probabilities for every action, and thus there are more universes. When one door close an infinite of doors will open, each universe is on its own path. Some may be exactly the same as ours until a split in the path is revealed and we no longer have the same outcome, but there will be infinite more that are still walking the same path as us. And there are infinite people who are writing this thread, some will make typos that others wont, some will not even be here. And infinite have died, by any means even suicide. You can say our lives are next to nothing in an unimaginable sea of infinity where all we are is a possiblity, a probablity.
damn bro
*hits blunt*
thats some good shit
>>8632821
Nice fallacies and non sequiturs. Here, have a sage.
>>8632821
Anon's woke, if he didn't take drugs, he has a very bright future desu.
Maybe you can do some research in Probability theory, OP.
If I'm not mistaken, the /sci/ wiki has some books about Statistics, Probability, etc. in the Mathematics section, so check it out!
>>8632826
*hits blunt*
If the universe is infinite, does that mean there are a infinite chemical elements, and matters of state in the universe?
C-Can this be an unanswered question in Chemistry though?
>>8632827
Chill, he's doing great by questioning everything, Anon-san.
Isn't that one of the principles of science and a nice life tip as well?
do you think intersectionality belongs in a science march?
>>8631162
What the fuck is a science march?
>>8631177
http://archive.is/UnZho
>>8631162
What the fuck is intersectionality?
Would it be effective (not to imply efficient) to decontaminate water by electrolyzing it into hydrogen + oxygen, then burning both gases back into water? What effect would this have on sodium fluoride present in the water, either during the electrolysis or in combustion?
it would create pure distilled water. If you could control the voltage/current enough you could even prevent the splitting of heavy water(present in all drinking water) but that would require precise and expensive equipment.
>>8631055
Are you sure there wouldn't still be some NaF still present in the water? Would it accumulate on one of the electrodes? The bit about heavy water sounds interesting, but it's not the purpose of this.
>>8631040
it's easier just to boil it and condense it.
Climatologist is a term constantly used by the media, and scientific articles. Can you get a degree in Climatology? I've been looking everywhere and can't find anyone who holds a Phd. in Climatology, or any degree for that matter? I can find when the first degree in Biology or Chemistry was awarded, but Climatology...nope.
Please help me out if you know who the first person to hold a Climatology degree was, and when it happened. Also any universities offering a degree in Climatology.
Thank you for your time /sci/.
>>8630975
They get their PhD's from Earth & Planetary Sciences departments, of which climatology is a subfield. You can get said degrees at any R1 school, including Harvard, Stanford, Berkeley, CalTech, MIT, etc.
>>8630993
So why do they keep using the term "Climatolgist" like it's a real thing, like saying Chemist or Biologist?
Is it simply to mislead the general public?
Climatologists usually have degrees in atmospheric science, geology, or geography.
It's like this with a lot of things. A volcanologist studies volcanoes; but to become one you get a geology degree. A Cetologist studies whales, but to become one you get a biology or ocean science degree. Uni degrees aren't the same thing as the name for the type of research you do.
>3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456485669234603486104543266482133936072602491412737245870066063155881748815209209628292540917153643678925903600113305305488204665213841469519415116094330572703657595919530921861173819326117931051185480744623799627495673518857527248912279381830119491298336733624406566430860213949463952247371907021798609437027705392171762931767523846748184676694051320005681271452635608277857713427577896091736371787214684409012249534301465495853710507922796892589235420199561121290219608640344181598136297747713099605187072113499999983729780499510597317328160963185950244594553469083026425223082533446850352619311881710100031378387528865875332083814206171776691473035982534904287554687311595628638823537875937519577818577805321712268066130019278766111959092164201989380952572010654858632788659361533818279682303019520353018529689957736225994138912497217752834791315155748572424541506959508295331168617278558890750983817546374649393192550604009277016711390098488240128583616035637076601047101819429555961989467678374494482553797747268471040475346462080466842590694912933136770289891521047521620569660240580381501935112533824300355876402474964732639141992726042699227967823547816360093417216412199245863150302861829745557067498385054945885869269956909272107975093029553211653449872027559602364806654991198818347977535663698074265425278625518184175746728909777727938000816470600161452491921732172147723501414419735685481613611573525521334757418494684385233239073941433345477624168625189835694855620992192221842725502542568876717904946016534668049886272327917860857843...
>is less than 4
>a number with infinite quantity is less than 4
fucking how?
>>8630930
Bcuz 3.1 < 4 lol
The real numbers are the largest infinity.
I.e.
The set of natural numbers N(1,2,3,...100,101,...10000000,...n, n+1) is infinite, however, the set of real numbers R has more numbers (a larger infinity) between 1 and 2 than all numbers in set N.
I can prove this by showing I can always find a new number that couldn't be listed between 1 and 2
1.a(1)a(2)a(3)a(4)...a(100)...etc
1.b(1)b(2)b(3)b(4)...b(100)...etc
1.c(1)c(2)c(3)c(4)...c(100)...etc
What is our new number that would never appear on this list? 1.a(1)b(2)c(3)
You're welcome, brainlet
>>8630939
FPWP
>start MS in statistics because it leads to a huge variety good paying jobs
>It's way less interesting than math
Did I goof?
>>8629626
Can I do an MS in stats with a BS in Chemistry, minor in Math?
>>8629637
Yes
>Less interesting that math
(1/2)
Hi /sci/, how are you guys?
First of all:
1-apologies for my bad English – it is not my first language.
2-apologies for the personal-blog post species.
>3-tl;dr: best way of learning math by yourself, for example: best order of areas and subjects to follow, best book to read, best websites to visit, etc.
So, I started to learn mathematics by my own recently. When I was at school I was terrible at it because of several reasons, like:
>a) Math scared the hell out of me.
>b) My father was extremely demanding and severe and somehow crippled me with fear and anxiety toward things I did not had natural aptitude (it was even worse with math, since it was a domain that he himself understood quite well).
>c) I couldn’t find math interesting because I wasn’t able not create anything with it, just solve exercises that all the other students were also solving (so I spend the classes reading, writing poetry and drawing). Of course, I knew that mathematicians - like artists - also create, but getting at such a high level is something I never felt capable of achieving.
>d) I hated being tested and was smashed by the pressure (in the exam-weeks I remembered that I was always affected by diarrhea: one of the reflexes of my nervousness).
>e) When I was interested in certain subjects I could not stop reading about it to focus on other, more practical or useful matters. For example: when I was reading the Greek plays and books about the Greek civilization I could not find within me the strength to put those material down and pick up the math books.
>>8625977
(2/2)
In my areas of interest I achieved some success, but I am a complete ignorant when it comes down to mathematics. I read popular science books but I know that they are not going to make that much of a difference. So I decided to actually learn math, slowly, from the very beginning.
I am now familiarizing myself with the first concepts of arithmetic, mostly doing exercises of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. I would like to know what order of subjects and areas is the best one to follow, and also what are the best books to learn, with the best and clearest explanations and the best exercises for one to solve.
Thank you all very much.
>>8625977
OP here.
I forgot to tell you guys what is my ultimate goal: my dream is being capable, many years from now, to understand the universe of modern physics, to actually understand Einstein’s, Schrödinger’s and Heinsenberg’s achievements.
I don’t know if I am capable of actually getting this far, but this is my dream and I will try my best.
>>8626004
That is a long way to go OP.
First off, you should familiarize yourself with the starting concepts and everything that is covered in HS math.
Then advance into precancerous and then into full calc. Some people have problems with series but you should not focus too much into them unless you are especially interested.
Then get into differential equations and differential geometry.
From here on, you will need to learn how to do and read proofs. Take Real analysis courses.
You can also learn complex analysis. It is not mandatory. However, you will learn very valuable techniques that will help you.
From here on, you just have to learn by yourself.
Books:
>The for Dummies series about math surprised me for how good it is. It is way cheaper than a college textbook and covers pretty much all the material.
Explain Hawking Radiation to me please
1) As far as I understand, the radiation is caused by particles with negative mass falling into the event horizon while the particles with positive mass escape. Shouldn't particles with negative mass escape just as often as positivie particles, thus cancelling out the effect?
>>8624226
>particle approaches EH
>gravitational energy about memehole
>virtual pair created due to energy imbalance
>both particles fall in = no radiation
>only one particle gets holecucked
>other virtual particle gains energy
>flies away, energy stolen from memehole
>e=mc^2
>memehole loses mass
>>8624242
this didn't help me at all
>>8624226
Virtual particle pairs are constantly being created near the horizon of the black hole, as they are everywhere. Normally, they are created as a particle-antiparticle pair and they quickly annihilate each other. But near the horizon of a black hole, it's possible for one to fall in before the annihilation can happen, in which case the other one escapes as Hawking radiation.The smaller the black hole the more accelerated it's degeneration will be as it has a smaller mass and therefore a smaller gravitational pull.
How many people frequent /sci/?
Am I just having arguments with the same handful of people?
3 fiddy
/sci/ is actually one big Turing test. There's only you, me and my AI. Did it pass?
>>8614245
Around 12. Yes.
I am sophomore in pure mathematics and at my university they are teaching kids who will participate in the local olympiad. One day I saw this question written in one of the classrooms:
Let [math] \square ABCD[/math] be a quadrilateral. Let [math] E [/math] be the midpoint of [math] \overline{\rm BC} [/math] and [math] F [/math] be the midpoint of [math] \overline{\rm DC} [/math]. If the lines connecting [math]A[/math] and these midpoints trisect the diagonal [math] \overline{\rm DB} [/math] then prove the quadrilateral is a parallelogram.
I wrote it down thinking it was a trivial kids problem and then started trying it to prove it by the usual tricks. Construct some parallel lines. some similar triangles and boom. But no. I HAVE BEEN DOING THIS FOR DAYS. Until now. This is my proof:
Consider the arbitrary points [math]B,C,D[/math] in space such that they make a triangle. Let the midpoint of [math] \overline{\rm BC} [/math] be [math] E [/math] and the midpoint of [math] \overline{\rm CD} [/math] be [math] F [/math]
By construction there exists a point A such that [math] \square ABCD[/math] is parallelogram and if it is a parallelogram then it can be proven that the lines [math] \overline{AE} [/math] and [math] \overline{AF} [/math] trisect the line [math] \overline{BD} [/math]
(this fact can be proven almost directly).
Lets also name [math]X[/math] as the point where [math] \overline{AE} [/math] intersects [math]\overline{BD}[/math] and [math]Y[/math] as the point where [math] \overline{AF} [/math] intersects [math]\overline{BD}[/math]
As [math]B,C,D[/math] are arbitrary, the original statement is equivalent to saying:
The only point [math]A[/math] such that [math]\overline{AE}[/math] and [math]\overline{AF}[/math] trisect the diagonal is the point [math]A[/math] such that the quadrilateral is a parallelogram.
(cont)
Fuckng word limit.
>>8632410
So now lets assume the contrary to this new equivalent statement. Suppose there exists another point [math]A' \neq A[/math] such that this statement is true for it.
That means that [math]\overline{A'E}[/math] passes through X or Y and that [math]\overline{A'F}[/math] passes through X or Y.
Lets assume that [math]\overline{A'E}[/math] passes through X and the other through Y. Then we get the two equalities:
[math]\overline{A'E} = \overline{XE} =\overline{AE} [/math] and [math]\overline{A'F} = \overline{YF} =\overline{AF} [/math] but this implies that [math]A' = A[/math], contradicting our hypothesis. If we consider the reverse case then we reach the same contradiction. Therefore this negation is contradictory and thus the proposition is true.
Holy fuck. Now that I am not completely a brainlet... can someone prove the original statement using only normal geometry? No fancy logic. Just by connecting some lines, proving some congruences, etc. Please.
>>8632411
going from your picture (and not what you wrote)
if DF = FE = EB and DF+FE+EB=DB then necessarily they must all be trisections of DB
if you place a point X on BD such that AX is perpendicular to BD, then the triangles DXA, AFE and AXB will all have the same area
maybe that points you in the right direction; I'd try to be of more help but I'm too drunk
>>8632530
>going from your picture (and not what you wrote)
The labelings in my picture and from a similar stack overflow problem I found when googling a proof for my problem. It describes the same situation.
>then necessarily they must all be trisections of DB
Yeah. For my theorem this is assumed. What needs to be proven is that this implies that quadrilateral is a parallelogram.
>if you place a point X on BD such that AX is perpendicular to BD, then the triangles DXA, AFE and AXB will all have the same area
Why?
>tfw too strong to do mental math
If I don't have a calculator with me, I'm a literal cripple in my classes. How do you deal with this, /sci/?
>>8632379
by not being a brainlet.
>>8632379
By not being a brainlet.
>>8632379
get a pencil and some paper
if you haven't memorized multiplication you're fucked
there are ways to reinforce a lack of skill in mental multiplication, but you'd have to be a non-idiot to understand how those ways work, so there's no real point to learning them