Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 62. page

Looks like someone had had a bit too much meth. Don't mind the spiders, they'll go away soon.

>>9150626
what?

>>9150885

Looks like OP is having a psychotic breakdown

Nah take 10

>>9150609
yes

I recommend loperamide

sit down and study

>>9150572
/thread

File: 8b2.gif (1MB, 480x407px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 480x407px

>>9150572
Fuuuck that.
Just spend a day watching shitty 10min popscience videos that you end up not learning anything from
Bonus points if you spend the next day asking for advice on a Vietnamese basket weaving forum pertaining to how to learn better

>>9150552
That depends on how your fitted curve is constructed. Could you shed any light on that?

you're right, there is no r-squared value for nonlinear data.

there really isn't a simple way to do this unfortunately. there ARE various tests you can do to demonstrate difference from a given distribution, but similarity is a tough thing to demonstrate

File: IMG_2639.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>9150571
Parameters for the curve-fit:
Center - 489.4
Width - 40.4
Height - 1453.2
% Gaussian - 84.5
Area - 67085.4

Would it be better if the curve-fit is 100% Gaussian or Lorentzian? The problem with that is the the fit does not come out as well

>>9150551
if you think about it (ironically), most of your actions and thinking aren't mediated by explicit use of language. On the otherhand, maybe not using language is suggestive of their lesser intelligence.

>>9150551
probably not that different from a mute & illiterate person, just imagine what your thought process would be like if you didn't read or write anything or speak with anyone

>>9150551
syntax doesn't need a written language
oogh agh oogh grraagh

>>9150446
Well a) it's a sci fi comedy show where the joke is that Rick just has that info in the back of his head for some fucked up reason and it's not supposed to be important information beyond that and b) there is evidently a finitely many alternate realities where what he just did would work so he, I dunno, counted them?

>>9150446

Improvisational comedy.

>>9150446
The subset of the infinite series is, itself, not infinite.

>>9150426
Ask /pol/

>>9150426

Racism is a social issue, not a scientific.

Check >>>/his/

>>9150435
moreover, a panaesthetisic issue.

>>9150319
take out the bits about sex and it kinda makes sense.

>>9150319
>the mind
>existing at all
>taking freud seriously
>ever
No anon.

>>9150437
Is anti-freudianism the atheism of post-2015 fedoras?

>>9150311
Read books, solve problems.

true. books helps. also study a wide range of subjects and apply scientific logic to them makes theories, discards any bad theories.

>>9150311
Doing nothing and lurking 4chan

retarded
/sage
google: "how big is hurricanes"

File: 1504394751238.png (43KB, 244x206px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 244x206px

>how big is hurricanes

>>9150276
>calls OP a retard
>how big is hurricanes
boy did you fall on your face with that line

File: cheat sheet.png (216KB, 1818x1701px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 1818x1701px

Did you lose your cheat sheet?
Here, you can use mine

\[f(x) = \frac{1}{x-3}

\frac{f(x)-f(x_0}{x-x_0} = \frac{\frac{1}{x-3} - \frac{1}{x_0 - 3}}{x - x_0} =

= \frac{\frac{x_0 - 3 - x + 3}{(x-3)(x_0-3)}}{x-x_0} =

= -\frac{x - x_0}{(x-x_0)(x-3)(x_0-3)}

For x \neq x_0

= -\frac{1}{(x-3)(x_0-3)} (1)

Now, as x \rightarrow x_0

(1) \rightarrow -\frac{1}{(x_0-3)^2}

So, f'(x_0) = -\frac{1}{(x_0-3)^2} \]

>>9150261
I'm having some trouble trying to read that.

>>9150209
Read his book. Fucking visionary:
https://www.amazon.ca/Future-Capitalist-Guide-Success/dp/146116916X

>>9150213
Most of /sci/ aren't level two stages though and as such can not comprehend what he's trying to convey.

File: 1502938860211.gif (881KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

881KB, 350x350px

> second looK

>let me draw this in a different color.....
>there we g-- no no that's not right.

>>9150834
Why doesn't he just assign the colours to hotkeys?
The videos infuriate me because of this clumsy shit, I always watch them at either 1.5x or 2x speed.

>>9150068
can be useful as an introduction to a topic, like first-day material to look at

beyond that, not really

>>9150022
Nuclear weapons are extremely hard to make, thankfully. Kim wants them so that he doesn't get overthrown like every single other dictatorship does that has no WMDs. Have you noticed Gadaffi and Hussein, two basically dictators that are now dead? That would be 100% alive right now if they had WMDs.

Kim then wants to annex South Korea, and then probably attack Japan and whoever else. The USA or someone else is definitely going to be destroying North Korea very soon, definitely before 2018, something is going to go down.

>>9150031
idk how you come to this conclusion lmao, there wont be a war on the korean peninsula because there is no scenario wherein someone actually profits

File: 1503535821622.png (2MB, 680x630px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 680x630px

>>9150022
>be Nork
>all of your equipment is so old that it's inpervious to EMP's
>be Amerifat
>put all kinds of stupid electronic bullshit in your equipment where it doesn't really belong
They're planning on using these things as EMP's then utterly raping defenseless US/SK/Japanese/maybe Chinese forces. The Norks may be poor but they're not stupid.

>>9150004
that's a joke, right? that pic?

>>9150006
Yes, it is

>>9150007
good, good.

was a bit worried there.

and to answer your question, yes it is. solid for a CS master's student.