What does /sci/ think the most viable renewable resource is?
We won't have oil & coal forever.
>>7914854
Solar, wind, geothermal, and hydroelectric.
In an ideal world, nuclear even though that's probably not defined as "renewable".
humans turning giant wheels while being whipped
Is ITER actually going to be able to achieve a net energy positive reaction?
>>7914801
Of course it will... eventually
A better question to ask would be "when". In which decade? (Or century lel)
>>7914801
wendelstein, look it up
>>7914811
ITER. It's a specific reactor.
Might never work. Might blow up. Might get its funding cut.
Project was launched in 1985. Now they're saying first plasma in 2025. Maybe.
>you're a keen young fusion researcher
>26 years old with a fresh PhD
>you get onboard with the new project that's going to build the first net-power fusion reactor
>the day is finally here
>you turn it on
>but just to test it
>there's no real fusion fuel in it
>you're 66 years old
>you're not scheduled to put tritium in it for more 7 years
>...on a delay-plagued project
>it's D-T day
>you're 78 years old
>you're really going to do it, you're going to try for net power fusion
>you turn it on
>magnetic reconnection
>the plasma burns a hole in the chamber
>the cryocooling system is breached
>a spot on containment coil goes ohmic
>liquid helium becomes gaseous helium
>it all explodes
>you're at a safe distance but
>heart attack
>as you die
>you bitterly
>think
>of
>fusion
Let's suppose there exist an infinite number of positive integers.
Let's consider all the postive integers that can be defined in the english language with a sentence of less than 1000 characters.
A sentence is a definition of a number if one and only one number correspond to the sentence. (not all sentences define a number)
It is easy to see that there is a finite number of sentences of less than 1000 characters, since there is an infinite number of positive integers, obviously some numbers can't be defined with less than 1000 characters.
Let's call N the smallest of this numbers that can't be defined with less than 1000 characters.
N can't be defined withh less than 1000 characters, yet the sentence:
-"The smallest number that can't be defined with less than 1000 characters"
contains less than 1000 characters and define N.
Hence N can be defined with less than 1000 characters, by contradiction there exist only a finite number of positive integers
Here I proved maths is just a meme. Can we move on now and stop pretending math is important.
I guess you're trolling, but just in case
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berry_paradox
>>7914747
You have not proven N exists, so the proof does not work.
>>7914831
Every subset of the positive integers contain a minimal element.
Even my 6 year old daughter know that.
Hey guys, my mother is in a pretty bad shape due to cancer. She's had it for about half a year now and it isn't getting any better. The main issue right now is that it is blocking the intestines and doesn't allow her to digest food properly or go to the bathroom. She's on heavy chemo right now to attempt to subdue the tumor so that we have more time to find alternative treatments. She's been through two surgeries so far to remove the tumor from the intestines but because so much of it has already been removed I don't think we can do surgery like that again. If anyone has any insight or resources towards potential treatments and help please let me know.
>>7914627
http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/clinical-trials
basically your the guinea pig in clinical trials. not sure how difficult it is to apply and get accepted.
Good luck, take care.
>>7914651
It must suck to be placed in the control group if you do a trial like that.
ITT:
Derivations of concepts in Physics that you never found satisfying
>>7914574
Physics
>>7914575
\thread
Kepler's laws
Physic books typically jump to Kepler's laws right after teaching Newton's axioms and then totally ignore that the sun gets pulled towards the earth too.
To this day I have never seen a derivation of Kepler's laws that is consistent with Newton's third law.
So tomorrow I have an interview for a MSc in Machine Learning?
How do I get the offer? I was planning to go super geeky and talk about all the technical ML stuff I've done in my degree, in Kaggle, extracurricular stuff such as Andrew Ng's and Daphne Kolller's ML courses, etc. But the guy is not an AI professor, he's an admissions tutor with background in CE.
How do I sell myself?
>>7914562
Tell them you're a transgender pansexual muslim. Youll fly in fa[math] [/math]m
>>7914569
>Tell them you're a transgender pansexual muslim. Youll fly in fa
Add in that you are a muslim but you sexually identify as a jew so you are a transmuslim jewkin.
>>7914569
[math]\forall[/math]yy lmao
Are ergonomic kneeling chairs bullshit or does it actually help your spine ?
you can slouch just as well in a kneeling chair as in a regular chair
There is this small chair by a 'osteophilicist' which apparently will sit you in a way that simulates standing but I forget the name, would be nice if someone could find that.
Just get a small table that you can kneel at, so that you're pretty much doing lunges the entire time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqVsA5wOjTw
>people still believe in flat earths
Why?
>>7914406
what do you mean "why"?
I only believe what I see with my own eyes, and I only see the earth as flat.
Actually even better, I can guarantee no one can see the earth as anything other than flat.
>>7914409
I'm not criticizing.
I'm just asking, why? Why is it that believable in the first place?
>>7914406
you cannot even prove that the earth exists.
>Experimental evidence of superconductors with critical temperatures above 373K is presented. In a family of different compounds we demonstrate the superconductor state, the transition to normal state above 387K, an intermediate 242K superconductor, susceptibility up to 350K, I−V curves at 4.2K in magnetic field of 12T and current up to 60A, 300K Josephson Junctions and Shapiro steps with radiation of 5GHz to 21THz, 300K tapes tests with high currents up to 3000A and many THz images of coins and washers. Due to a pending patent, the exact chemical characterization and technological processes for these materials are temporarily withheld and will be presented elsewhere.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01482
>>7914174
At what pressure though? IIRC this is the reason why other high temperature superconductors have failed.
>>7914174
Can't read now, but damn this would give me a boner if legit
>Due to a pending patent, the exact chemical characterization and
technological processes for these materials are temporari
ly withheld and will be presented elsewhere.
FUCK
Do you guys think it's possible to publish something that's as groundbreaking and as influential as works like Newton's Principia, Smith's Wealth of Nations, Marx' Das Kapital, Darwin's The Origin of Species and so on?
Academic books/papers that reshaped not only their respective academic fields but also society.
Or has everything become so advanced and specialized that making a huge dent like past academic giants is near impossible? Is there too much noise? Too many publications of absolutely useless shit in which bigger nuggets of wisdom just go under?
For the longest of times I have had a very idealistic view of academia, then I became part of that whole world and feel like we've become absolutely stagnant in advancing human civilization. Fucking bloggers make more of an impact than scientists do....
off-topic: absolutely loving old books
>>7913924
>groundbreaking and as influential
>Newton's Principia
... perhaps over-estimating the impact of Principia?
Why are non-european races so bad at drinking milk?
Hasn't domestication of animals been common for most ancient peoples?
I can drink milk yet I'm American.
Debunked.
>>7913932
Americans, by majority, have european ancestry...
>>7913922
>Hasn't domestication of animals been common for most ancient peoples?
... clearly not, fgt pls
>>7913892
20. An n+1 dimensional tetrahedron looks, on layer 4, like an n-dimensional tetrahedron.
>>7913898
/thread
too bad, first reply is correct :D
brb, preparing further question
Hey guys, this is hopefully /sci/ related enough for you. Recently, the Chancellor of the University of California, Berkeley submitted a plan which would involve dissolving (no pun here) the College of Chemistry, currently independent administratively and admissions wise, into the college of Letters and Science and College of Engineering (pure chem would be folded into L&S and ChemE would go to CoE).
However, this would be destroying a major part of the University, both historically and academically. CoC utilizes its independence to limit undergrad humanities requirements and maximize undergraduate research, giving them a competitive edge for grad school, as well as keeping Berkeley the best undergrad Chem program in the world.
The CoC is also the college with the most Nobel Prizes out of any department at the university.
What do you think would be the best course of action for halting this administrative bungle, and what do you guys think about it? (there's a change.org petition I won't bother linking since they're worthless anyways, but curious how to prevent a scientific travesty)
>>7913725
Bump
>>7913748
/sci/ is slow, you don't need to bump after a few minutes
The administration has no credibility at all when making statements on how much money there is, how it is spent, etc.
The state audit revealed that the UC could not provide any accounting for 6.6 billion in a five year period. That was ~4.5% of the annual budget at the time, for five years running.
That said, I don't see a reliable means to stopping the administration from doing as it pleases.
"Shared governance" between the faculty senate and campus administration at Cal was exposed as a sham after the campus administration agreed to make DIA self-funding and went behind the FS's back to fund athletics to the tune of $10 million/year for seven years. When publicly called out, they merely reduced the impermissible payments to $5 million/year, and refused to fire Birgeneau, Barbour, or Brostrom (the persons most responsible for the breach of the administration's promise to the faculty).
>>7913766
(I bump when it hits page 2 on homepage, usually)
That seems like we should be fighting this even more, then. It seems to me that blame lies on all sides- Napolitano, Dirks mismanaging UC, and Brown refusing to allocate the proper funds to fulfill the university's original mission.
1.13 MB
1.13 MB PNG
So I'm staying at this hotel and they have a jar full of jelly beans and if guess it right you get a two nights stay free, I got a size comparison for you to get a feel on how big this jar is,
So how much do you think is in the jar?
>>7913528
There's a tennis ball or golf ball in the jar. Even if you got perfect measurements, you'd still be wrong.
>>7913528
When I was a kid my daycare did a jelly bean guessing contest, the prize was one of their IBM PCs loaded with games. They upgraded so they didn't need it anymore. I won that shit, good memories.
IDK, I'd estimate around 1500. If you really wanted you could count the number of jelly beans number of jelly beans that form continuous planar ring around the jar and get a circumference in terms of jelly beans and then count the number high. From that and some circle formulas you could probably get a much closer estimate though to complicate matters it looks like the jar is slightly concave which will throw you off a bit. Eh, only do this if you're autistic.
Be careful u might lose a leg
Why do people argue whether global warming/climate change is real?
Why don't people just argue that we should limit the production of pollution?
Why don't people just argue that we should find alternative energy sources that are renewable?
because the best strawman is the one that works, and becomes adopted as a platform by the opposition
>>7913396
They do argue these things. Then people shoot back that the economics of renewables aren't up to snuff yet and that the curtailing of pollution will cause economic harm (cause it's definitely cheaper and easier to pollute, so you're losing that extra bit of cash). That's when people start bringing in the global warming and environment argument, as a way of saying it's going to cost more than these economists and businessmen are griping about. How much any of it is really going to cost, who should pay what and when is still a massive debate, obviously.
>>7913396
Same reason people "argue" over whether the earth is flat, evolution is true, GMOs are safe, etc.