why a negative times a negative is a positive?
>>7924562
Because -a * -b = (-1) * a * (-1) * b = a * b
faggot
>>7924562
Multiplication is addition
>>7924571
incorrect.
gaylord
>tfw you finally learn the difference between dx and delta x from a geometric perspective and you understand that the use of the tangent plane in R3 to approximate is analogous to use of the tangent line in R2.
Post your recent breakthroughs in understanding math.
>>7924480
>the difference between dx and delta x from a geometric perspective
which is ?
I understood not to use toilet paper instead of my hand. I'd say the mental capacity it required to realize this was compatible to yours.
>>7924504
Oh, I misspoke. I meant the difference between dz and delta z (z being the dependent variable).
The difference is that dz is the change in z using the linearization and delta z is the change in z using the actual function.
For instance, in R2 with y = f(x). You find the derivative at x = a, which can be used to create a tangent line.
Moving from a to b, the dy added to f(a) will always land on the tangent line.
Moving from a to b, the delta y added to f(a) will always land on the original function.
NEW MEME: all soft science and philosophy shittery goes to >>>/his/
MODERATORS CAN WE GET THIS APPENDED TO THE STICKY!!
>>7924453
Omg please yes
We can keep some soft sciences like some biology threads were pretty alright, but imagine a /sci/ without all the consciousness/free will/bioethics/epistemology shit
Bump?
>>7924453
bump-desu
I wonder: how does a day, a week of a driven person look like?
Do they spend time on entertainment at all? Do they read the news, browse any blogs, watch any kind of tv shows or movies? Do they spend time educating themselves on something outside of their field? Do they have any other hobbies like art? How much do they work a day? How often do they take breaks? Do they try to maximize their work time by neglecting diet, fitness and sleep?
The answer heavily depends on your definition of driven
>>7924396
Well CEOs of startups, scientists, someone trying to become an astronaut...
>>7924396
This.
I've been described as "driven" and being a natural hard worker by academic advisors and such.
However, I spend large amount of time doing fuck-all. The "driven" bit comes when I have shit that I need to do I'll always prioritize work and I'll always get it done and do it well. But outside of my own area I don't really give a shit. I have no hobbies and struggle to maintain a basic level of humanity.
But then you have people who work several jobs and study and have a company and have hobbies and that's a whole different can of worms.
Well?
>>7924330
Pretty gay thqh. At least it's not pink
Really tacky.
>>7924330
fuck-ups in line 4
What do you all think ?
This woman says it can be done and as you can see here, this is all her trash from within the last year.
Also, and this is surprising, she says recycling is not the answer and we should recycle less. In fact, we should start reUSING instead.
Thoughts?
http://www.goingzerowaste.com/blog/2016/3/10/32jmfqi49fwy6drwnz5ekusin3pclq
define "trash"
its impossible to live without waste [spoiler]define waste [/spoiler]
> poo poo pee pee
>>7923676
obviously we're not referring to biological functions
>>7923676
Burn your poop or make biogas with it for fuel.
Some engineers in India designed a generator that runs on feces to bring electricity to remote rural villages. I shit you not (pun unintended).
- π + π = 0
infinity minus infinity isn't 0 you retard
>>7923290
Anything negative plus the same thing possitive would be zero
>>7923290
Nice b8
Knowledge test:
What is the area of the circle that is not covered by the triangle?
>>7923269
Nice try in getting us to do your homework.
15.42 cm^2
>>7923269
15.35 units
wtf is the the exponential form fourier series of sin^4(x)
I got the coefficient of Fn to be zero but that cant be right
>>7923226
show your work, will tell you where you made a mistake.
for all n the thing is zero
>>7923233
my book shows something with l'hopitals rule when the top and bottom are zero so it might have something to do with that but idk
My knowledge of orbits is entirely ksp based but I have a question.
Say a man pushes himself off the ISS as hard as he can, and the ISS orbits the earth every 90 minutes. Wouldn't the mans altered orbit meet up again with the ISS 90 minutes later making the whole thing survivable?
>>7923134
The man does not stop instantly in space, he still has velocity relative to the earth. That said, I'm blanking rn on where he'd go.
>>7923137
Nuh, I know he's still going as fast as the ISS but his orbit has been changed because he jumped... and he'll be furthest from the station on the other side of the orbit but meet up again in the same spot he jumped.
the red orbit will take longer to complete, so by the time he reaches the same position again on the red orbit, the ISS will be slightly further on the green orbit than it was the previous pass
When you hear about how a planet the size of mars, 4 billion years ago, impacted the earth and created the moon, how come the moon appears to be a perfect sphere from the outside? same with the earth and other planets. how come they have the appearance of a perfect circle? is this the result of billions of years of something?
>>7923007
Because we live in a 3 dimensional space and gravity exerts a uniform force form every point around an object in 3 dimensions.
it's the simplest and most durable shape for the forces exerted upon it by gravity in a 3D plane of existence.
If you were as massive as a planet you would take on a spherical shape too.
It's called accretion you dumbasses
>>7923007
Magnets.
Can you do it?
You're not retarded right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIhk9eKOLzQ
>>7922941
>A wire
>"A" implies singular
>can't complete circuit as you there is no neutral to hot
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>7922964
Looks like there's already one person who can't do it.
>>7922941
How many American students does it take to light a lightbulb
Hi, I've posted this before on /x/ but well, you know...
I wonder if our brains are limited to thinking of things based on this universe rules or we can think of whatever could be ever possible because our universe is everything that ever could exist?
Just try to think about something else, something that isn't possible in this universe, some another "God's Creation", somthing completely different (and I'm not talking about world where grass is blue or cows fly). You can't, because everything that you think of has got some aspects defined by our senses. Either it's at least 2 dimensional or has a colour or makes a sound. Those facts leave me wondering about the question:
Is this universe everything that ever could happen or we can't think of different things?
go back to /x/
>>7922950
Thanks for a constructive response, I'll meet you there
>>7922940
You forgot your trip jaden smith
>I wonder if our brains are limited to thinking of things based on this universe rules
Well yeah if we could just break the rules they wouldn't really be rules
If you imagine something out of this world, that means imagining something out of this world is within this worlds rules
What you're asking is like saying "what if something out of this box was in this box"
That's impossible because the moment you put it in the box, it is no longer out of the box. It's just another thing in the box.
>P will never equal NP
>Computers will always be fundamentally bottlenecked by the lack of efficient algorithms to crack problems whose only other option is bruteforce in exponential time, which may or may not exceed the expected age of the universe to solve
>this means no hard AI oracle Gods
God damn physical limitations are depressing.
I don't feel frightened by not knowing things, I think it's much more interesting that way.
>>7922891
Shut the fuck up zombie Feynman.
>>7922886
>>7922873
>>7922889
Memers stop memeing
Memers stop memeing
Memers stop memeing
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2016/03/10/large-hadron-collider-results-may-hint-at-new-era-physics.html
The standard model is about to breakdown. Why are you guys not panicking?
>>7922625
Why would we panick? It's exciting at worst.
>>7922576
>"new era of particle physics"
>being this popsci
>literally discovering more imaginary particles to satisfy autistic theorists wet dreams that have virtually zero practical application
>>7922576
>th-the standard model is done! I'm gonna sell my house and move to africa!