Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1874. page

>>7894249
Take your racism to >>>/pol/. Foreign species are enriching our wildlife.

>>7894252
I know you're trolling on the /pol/ part, but invasive species are a threat to the global biodiversity. Science can learn a lot from nature, but at this rate there won't be any special or interesting species left in the future

If /sci/ knew the answer invasive species wouldn't be a problem

>>7894043

Because if you study engineering, you become a superior being

>lecturer_crossing_the_word_science_from_computer_science.gif

>>7894045
Shouldnt software engineering gain the respect of other engineering disciplines?

Just eat a lot of fiber from various sources.

just eat lots of fiber and drink lots of water.

>>7893912
>barely requires wiping at all
>ideally
I use like one roll of TP per shitting session. I think this is the cause for my shitposting.

>>7893872
Are we including car doors? If so, it's an unequivocal yes. If not, I still think there's more doors but I'm not as certain as if we're including car doors.

maybe, maybe not

probably more humans actually

Considering that in third world countries like china, india, africa, the middle east and also most of south america, people just do not have doors as they are safe without them. I'd say that there are more people than doors.

>>7893666
It's good. Also look at IFR and ThorCon.

File: 6a00d8341c091653ef01543860df54970c-500wi.jpg (34KB, 468x363px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 468x363px

Why the second cooling loop?

Also,

>Solid core reactors must be shut down to remove waste

Bitches don't know about my AGR.

>>7893874
>34 KB
> Why the second cooling loop?
I assume tritium control and for additional safety margin.

tungsten

>>7893193
wolfram

>>7893198
is it on windows phone?

1. All science and math related topics welcome.

File: treelanguages.600.529.s.png (262KB, 600x529px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 600x529px

>>7892990
Linguistics is a science. It's not even a soft science; it's fucking science.

>>7892988
I think linguistics is an extremely interesting and promising scientific endeavor, but it's unfortunate that there's so much disagreement among professional linguists. almost every subfield has a few divisions. in historical linguistics you have strict neogrammarians vs lexical-diffusion people. in morphology you have word-based vs morpheme-based approaches. in semantics it seems like nobody agrees on anything. in phonology you have mostly optimality theory people but there are definitely dissenters out there. then of course there's syntax, where there is substantial agreement among a plurality of linguists around minimalist/biolinguistic/chomskyan syntax, but there are a ton of (vehemently) non-mainstream proposals like the different kinds of categorial grammar, construction grammar, hpsg, lfg, gpsg, and other things.

>>7892984
That picture violates the Aufbau Principle.
REEEEE

>>7892984
Yes

>>7892984
It depends on their relative velocity vectors. The possibilities are:

- collision: this is a singularity that requires perfect initial velocity including stationary relative to each other
- orbit: they go into orbit around each other
- hyperbolic/parabolic: they interact and go their separate ways.

Given their distance and mass it would be unlikely they ever meet.

>>7892981
If you're not resourceful enough to get a job using your math degree you're a pathetic human being.

Count yourself lucky that you enjoy studying STEM. Try getting a high-paying job in today's society with only a philosophy or lit degree.

>>7892981
minor in physics worth it ?
doing a CE major

>>7892838
macroevolution

evolution, consciousness and free will

whether biology is a science or not

>hurr muh IQ
>einstein
>fysöks
Can we stop with these bait threads already?

>>7892321
IQ does not ensure results in math or physics, it will only help one understand these concepts.

He published what’s known as Barnett’s identity while working on his theory of quantum astronomy:
[eqn]\sum_{n \,=\, 0}^\infty n \,=\, \frac{{\rm e}^{\mathrm i \pi}}{11.999\dots}[/eqn]
He derived it by thrice iteration of integration operators and by evaluating non-trivial zeros of real valued second degree polynomials of a single variable. A very difficult work in topological probability theory.

>>7892286
>please be bait
Formal charges are 0

>>7892286
>how come NO isnt an ion
Chem 101 fags please pay attention to the lectures for at least 1 minute.

>>7892286
whats the problem op

Bonus points for examples?

All trascendental numbers have length and limit. The only thing you can't do is use transcendental numbers as results to fractions.

Sorry, sorry, forgot to add a condition.

The 2D object in question is an object that can be drawn with straight edge and compass in a finite number of steps.

>>7891867
Step 1) Stop being an insecure shit trying to convince an arbitrarily small number of people about your views (even if you're more intelligent than them)
Step 2) Thank me (your welcome)

I can't help but think that a need to prove the validity/applications of what you do to people who aren't from your field or understand your field (along with the field in which applications or validity is present), is just a bad, bad, life skill for any pure mathematician.

If you discover something solid, someone or the other is going to get it to use.

If you're just trying to make people appreciate what you know, it points to weak character.

Do you really desire for others to see what you see so badly? You spineless dependent slug?

>>7891882
Thanks for the excellent reply. I mostly targeted it towards someone I know (close to me) that values programming knowledge over mathematically 'useless' knowledge (or useless in the sense it isn't meaningful unless applied).

You're completely right. This speaks more towards my own insecurity and need for validation and dependency. I don't need to justify studying to anyone. Plus, I don't really know if I should say I study "computer science". Most the programmers I know don't even know basic math & I don't program shit. Hank's for the reply anon. Saved it for future reading.

>>7891867
can we stop these threads where computer "scientists" try to convince us that the maths they do is in any way significant or rigorous.

>>7891494
>Are you as buttmad as me?

Nope, but then I'm not a faggot.

>>7891494
>He earned a degreeinRussianlinguistics fromIndiana University.[4]He also received an honoraryDoctor of Engineeringdegree from Villanova University.[5][6]On November 25, 2011, Hyneman was awarded anhonorary doctoratefrom theUniversity of Twente(Enschede,Netherlands)

>>7891499
That pic is not Jamie Hymenen