http://phys.org/news/2016-11-distant-star-roundest-nature.html
> The star Kepler 11145123 is the roundest natural object ever measured in the universe.
> Stellar oscillations imply a difference in radius between the equator and the poles of only 3 km. This star is significantly more round than the sun.
What is the scientific explaination between this impossibly perfect roundness of a star 2 times bigger than the sun? It's a gas sphere so it is a lot more vulnerable to the random debris, piercing asteroids and other distorting forces around the space but it doesn't seem to be effected by them.
What are the implications of this unnatural precision?
>>8480247
didnt we find that an electron in terms of charge distribution is an exact sphere?
>>8480247
the dust cloud in which the star was formed had a near net 0 angular momentum.
>>8480247
It's very possible the planet has nothing orbiting it, and a lack of any noticeable gravity well may explain its nearly perfect spherical shape.
That...or its aliens.....
Gravel is being dumped from a conveyor belt at a rate of 50 {\rm ft}^3{\rm /min}. It forms a pile in the shape of a right circular cone whose base diameter and height are always the same. How fast is the height of the pile increasing when the pile is 16 ft high?
edit : its 50 ft^3/min
use the formula for volume a of cone, take derivative and set equal to defined constant, use implicit differentiation to get the height from there, which of course is a function of time and thus can be differentiated
either that, or could actually read your fucking calculus textbook
>>8480218
Height/Volume * Volume/Time =Height/Time
Volume= 1/3*pi*1/4*Height^3
What does /sci/ think about Sigmund Freud?
>>8480203
He went to my university. Now all the sociologists and feminists here feel extra entitled.
>>8480203
Sve ludo, jebeš mi mater.
>>8480203
He was a fucking lunatic who snorted coke, fucked women all day, and made up wild theories as to why humans behave the way they do.
In the realm of psychology, the only thing that truly stuck from him was that of psychotherapy. Even this is thought of as being shit in modern psychology.
Like other psychologists of his time, his work lacked the merit of being disproved. Read into many other psychologists conjectures, and you'd be hard pressed to understand why a particular person did what they did.
He's just a meme.
Should scientists get more media training?
Speaking from personal experience, I think they should. A while back I authored a high profile paper, and was subsequently approached by journalists. In interviews I didn't want to sacrifice accuracy for simplicity, which resulted in a few newspapers publishing things that completely missed the point of the article or were simply wrong. I've learned from this experience, of course, but I think a little bit of media training could have prevented the whole ordeal.
Moreover, as is quite clear at the moment, scientists are simply not vocal enough when it comes to important issues. For instance, if many scientists would openly speak out in the press against Trump's stance on climate change, it'd be harder for him to get away with blatantly denying what is scientific consensus.
We need to be able to communicate our findings to the public, so it seems strange that we never formally learn how to do that most effectively.
Please respond
>>8480137
>>8480137
No I want to study physic. I don't want an additional bullshit class about communication.
What would happen if I built a magnet that could exert a intense pull on another magnet on pluto?
>>8479962
You'd die
>>8480080
no u'd dei olol
>>8479962
well then the sun would crash into the moon and there'd be a new crater up there.
Why is NASA so bad at faking images of the Earth?
Pls respond.
>>8480008
kek stay bluepilled cuck the multinationals are reaping the profits of our belief that earth is round every single day
If from personal experience, can you describe it?
Lucid dreaming comes to mind.
It's a really interesting concept. I've had it where I've spoken with my subconscious in my dream. Generated a version of myself infront of me and had long winded conversations. Can usually do it everytime I'm in a dream.
Keep in mind I've been lucid dreaming for 3+ years at this point so it's very vivid and controllable but definitely obtainable.
>>8479798
happened to me once... not exactly, but similar... was in sleep paralysis, then everything started to go black, and i fell through my bed down and i was falling and i fell into a dream.
where did i fuck up? i can't see it yet it's definetly not the right direction. i'm supposed to get a 3-2rad(s) in the numerator which doesn't make sense to me.
what would Lennard Euler do...
>>8479601
>mid November
>still on quotient rule
Confirmed for brainlet
You fucked up by making it to university without being able to do the fucking quotient rule.
drew this up. this is basically how gravity works yeah?
Duh? Did you just want to hear the reverbs in your echo chamber?
>>8479521
Gravity is caused by all energy, not just matter
>>8479542
yes
Im at Dykstra Hall 435 right now, report in or come to the waiting outside De Neve.
I know you fags are here so report in.
post a pic of sum nice pussy first
>>8479370
I literally live on your floor dude
what the fuck
Are you Nikhil or Ani
>tfw live in Northern Canada and still no snow
>mfw climate change will actually make Canada have fair weather and good climate while the rest of the world burns.
When I was a kid we'd get weeks of -20 to -30 temps. Now it happens maybe once a winter, it's not even enough to kill the pine beetles anymore.
Yeah I know weather isn't climate, but the change is noticeable.
Same here in southern Finland
Congratulations. All those nearer-to-the-equater ethnic groups now will want your real estate more.
If pure mathematical problems tend to be more difficult and require a higher IQ than theoretical physics problems, then why are pure math people usually dumber than physicists?
>>8479312
>why are pure math people usually dumber than physicists?
Unsubstantiated claim.
>>8479312
>why are pure math people usually dumber than physicists?
False premise.
Alot of futurist are confident that the Technology singularity will happen in the next 30ish years.
If this is true then until then...
> what do?
I'll be in my early 50s by then.
Should I just keep myself alive until then and follow my dreams while I can? Because none of that shit will matter when the day hits.
>>8479301
Plus would there be a way to prepare?
And do you have a theory of how it will happen or if it will even happen at all?
>>8479301
>how do i log plot
>>8479309
Should I just snort cocain off of hookers till then? Enjoy being a human while I can?
Hello. I am Tenjin, the God of learning. I will grant you one skill you wish to aquire. However, you must be specific with your choice as it will increase the chance of the wish being fulfilled, if you are too vague, then you will likely get nothing. For example, saying Arts will yield a 10 percent chance of success; drawing, 50 percent; drawing manga, 80 percent etc. I cannot tell you the exact chances that your wish will succeed, only you will know yourself. And remember, I am the God of learning which means I can only grant you skills that can be learned, I cannot turn back time, or grant you superpowers.
>>8479246
expert level grammar skills please.
Techneques in which my ability to master content, both physical and mental, grows exponentially with decreasing effort needed to master said content.
TL:DR
Make me an mc op!
>>8479246
The skill to stop shitposting on 4chan.
what is the science behind hallucinating voices?
>>8479206
You are hearing the voice of God, it's not science. It's faith.
>>8479220
great well, thanks. is there anything else you would like to add? what is the mechanism by which the hallucination is heard? is it just a random pulse of electrons like a short-circuiting wire?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702442
Basically still unsure, but it's correlated with low grey matter volume, changes in connectivity, lesions on the brain, etc.