[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 562. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: Xocoveza.jpg (502KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]
Xocoveza.jpg
502KB, 2048x1365px
I attempted a bit of product photography. How did I do, /p/?
16 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>2714281
I understand there is a christmas theme to the shoot, however I find the background very distracting. Perhaps shooting the drinks in a studio with some mistletoe or something may have been a better approach to it but I'm not sure.
>>
seconding, backgrounds steals the attention, even if out of focus. it's way too busy.
your product is also quite in the dark, needs much more light on it. what's bright attracts the eye, and in here, your background is brighter.

by all product photography standards, you did bad. I kinda like your approach on colors though.
>>
File: cerveza.jpg (231KB, 900x819px) Image search: [Google]
cerveza.jpg
231KB, 900x819px
has lots of errors, but you got the mood right so youre well started. thats a key element.

box looks unimpresive. id put it centered, shot from an angle, and with more separation from background. aka. smoother bokeh.. id do this using telephoto from a corner (get up a chair) or some cool wide angle big aperture lens. also use back lightning on the subject to give it shape, right now its an ugly shadowy bulk. subject is underexposed, needs a direct light source too. also white balance, looks tungsten as fuck.

post corrected version anon.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:12:03 09:40:52
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width900
Image Height819

File: fbprofile2x1080.jpg (291KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]
fbprofile2x1080.jpg
291KB, 1080x1080px
I take lots of portraits but I think I can be making them better. I have two umbrellas, two spotlights and a handful of flashes that work wirelessly with my camera. How should I be setting them up? Diagrams and suggested reads would be great. Pic related, took this earlier today.
Also lighting general

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2015:12:02 16:38:53
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1080
Image Height1080
23 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>2714062
How you set your lighting depends entirely on the mood of the shoot you're going for. Are you just asking for every lighting setup known to man, listed for you at my expense? Or do you just not feel like googling "Portrait Lighting Diagram"?
>>
>>2714062
Did you make the background white in post?

And it looks you're underlighting his (your?) face with the key--throwing unfortunate shadows from his nose and sweater.

And this framing is weird. Double amputee.

And it looks like you tried to kick from the same side that the key light is on, which is also weird and unconventional. This is just all backwards.
>>
>>2714064
Sorry, I didn't intend to put the load of work on your shoulders Anon. Most of the results google has returned have been from c u c k s that don't actually produce good fotos. Tbh, I hadn't even thought about how mood would affect lighting when using artificial light.

File: image.jpg (699KB, 1932x2576px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
699KB, 1932x2576px
Just wanted to share a beautiful picture.
19 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
She's pregnant.
>>
6 months pregnant at that.
>>
>>2713862
> Has so to complain about fat girls to seem edgy
> Spends so little time around women that anon can't tell when a woman is pregnant vs. overweight

Thanks anon I need a good chuckle in the morning

File: image.jpg (863KB, 2048x1357px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
863KB, 2048x1357px
Let's post some comfy photography

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2048
Image Height1357
312 posts and 150 images submitted.
>>
I like it.
>>
File: FujiForest_20.jpg (612KB, 533x799px)
FujiForest_20.jpg
612KB, 533x799px
>>2700108
Are we all comfy?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 550D
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2014:11:04 13:57:15
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/13.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/13.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width533
Image Height799
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_0022_1.jpg (357KB, 2048x988px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0022_1.jpg
357KB, 2048x988px
>>2700119

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 550D
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number1132529712
Lens NameEF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2015:09:16 13:23:50
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2048
Image Height988
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModePartial
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeUnknown
Focus ModeOne-Shot
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceDaylight
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed160
Color Matrix129

File: Columbine-Surveillance.jpg (308KB, 600x460px) Image search: [Google]
Columbine-Surveillance.jpg
308KB, 600x460px
Hello /p/

I want to equip my bedroom with one or two always-on cameras. But there's so many choices out there... webcams, surveillance cameras, etc.

All I want is crisp and smooth 1080p at 30 fps and a sensor that has no IR flter. So I'll also need to have a hidden but fairly strong IR light source in the room.

Ideally, the video would be saved straight to the server I have in the guest room, and only save the last 3 days of footage.

Does any of you have a set-up like this in your home? Or anything similar?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwarePixelmator 2.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2014:04:20 09:04:78
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width600
Image Height460
17 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>2713824
You're looking for >>>/g/
>>
>>2713825
Déjà-vu.

>You're looking for >>>/p/

Perhaps I'm really looking for the pervs in /b/?
>>
>>2713835
Well you're either perverted (/s/) or paranoid (/k/) so good luck.

File: 98500003.jpg (1MB, 1000x985px) Image search: [Google]
98500003.jpg
1MB, 1000x985px
So I finally got my first few rolls from my Bronica SQ-A developed. Thought I'd share a few of my faves.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.3 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:12:02 11:25:56
24 posts and 14 images submitted.
>>
File: 98500001.jpg (1MB, 1000x985px) Image search: [Google]
98500001.jpg
1MB, 1000x985px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.3 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:12:02 11:25:54
>>
File: 98500002.jpg (1MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
98500002.jpg
1MB, 1000x1000px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.3 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:12:02 11:25:55
>>
File: 98500005.jpg (945KB, 1000x985px) Image search: [Google]
98500005.jpg
945KB, 1000x985px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.3 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:12:02 11:25:58

File: 4L_9esQGCua.png (380KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]
4L_9esQGCua.png
380KB, 640x1136px
How is this okay? How is this "photography" accepted?
32 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
File: 4L_XOZio2qq.png (551KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]
4L_XOZio2qq.png
551KB, 640x1136px
>>
File: 4L_dEaDur7c.png (484KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]
4L_dEaDur7c.png
484KB, 640x1136px
...
>>
He's a phototaker, not a photographer.

>Nikon buys Samsungs camera business

This rumor is being posted on a few different websites at the moment..

If true, would it be a good or bad move by Nikon?

I honestly liked the NX1 as a camera, though I did not need it I think the image quality seemed very good and the feature set (including huge firmware updates) was excellent.


But realistically, could the sensors compete with Sony offerings?

http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/some-disruptive-samsung-rumor-coming-soon/

http://www.slrlounge.com/disruptive-news-coming-samsung-pentax-ff-update-cp9-announced-daily-roundup/
22 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2713674
>But realistically, could the sensors compete with Sony offerings?

Yes.

Is the thread over now?
>>
>>2713674

>Implying Samsung didn't buy Nikon
>>
>>2713679
>implying R I C O H didn't just buy both Samsung and Nikon

:^)

my canon ae-1's manual is broken. does anybody have any cheap/diy fixes? im desperate to revive this camera, please help

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
PhotographerCharles Lanteigne
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
15 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
get a new one for $5
>>
>>2713565
lets assume i dont want a new one, just to repair my old one. honestly it has sentimental value so, humor me please
>>
>>2713556
>my canon ae-1's manual is broken. does anybody have any cheap/diy fixes?
look up the manual online, duh

File: IMG_20151115_062002.jpg (4MB, 4608x3456px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20151115_062002.jpg
4MB, 4608x3456px
I'm pretty new to photography, I have a Canon Powershot SX520 (I know, kinda on the cheap side of things) I was thinking about getting filters, but I had questions that I didint know where else to ask. First, is it worth it to buy filters? Second are there specific filters for each camera or do they all work for all. I took this pic a few months ago. Settings on auto I think because I had gotten the camera two days prier so I was still figuring things out. (First camera that wasn't like a $50 Kodak)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelCanon PowerShot SX520 HS
Equipment MakeCanon
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2015:11:15 06:20:16
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Exposure Time1/500 sec
ISO Speed Rating200
F-Numberf/6.0
Lens Aperturef/6.0
Color Space InformationsRGB
Metering ModePattern
Exposure Bias0 EV
Image Height3456
Image Width4608
Focal Length180.60 mm
Scene Capture TypeStandard
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
RenderingNormal
White BalanceAuto
Exposure ModeAuto
Image Number100-0152
16 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
I have a better version of this, but not on my phone right now
>>
Zero : there are many things much more important than filters, and you don't seem to even know what sort of filter you're looking for. I wouldn't recommend you to even bother with that, yet.

1: depends
2: no, it's dependent on the lens diameter.
>>
I was thinking just the simple UV, maybe even a macro cause sometimes I like to try to do small things just can never do it

File: molly.jpg (70KB, 640x357px) Image search: [Google]
molly.jpg
70KB, 640x357px
>http://petapixel.com/2015/12/01/annie-leibovitz-shoots-the-pirelli-calendar-into-a-new-direction/

>real womyn
>muh curves
>#whatmenreallywant

So Pirelli decided to let an overrated, jewish feminist take the pictures of their famous Calendar.

Why? She has no talent at all. All she does is pressing the shutter button. Her countless assistans do everything else for her.
How can she call herself a (professional) photographer?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:12:01 09:14:19
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width640
Image Height357
25 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>The whole idea was not to have any pretense in these pictures, and be very straightforward, and show these women exactly who they are

Therefore, let us obviously produce the most pretentious photos of 2016 for the most pretentious calendar of 2016.
>>
>>2713393
>All she does is pressing the shutter button
Incorrect, in absolute terms.
>>
File: 1422659418812.png (597KB, 754x638px) Image search: [Google]
1422659418812.png
597KB, 754x638px
>professional photography is not about the actual photography, but how well you can sell yourself

Oh boy OP, you might be the first one to discover these, you should publish your results in a scientific magazine

/p/, what is your philosophy on post-processing, and how do you utilize it?

I'm relatively new to serious photography and shooting in RAW. I've only just started using Lightroom and begun to understand the potential of the program. Recovering shadows and un-fucking blown highlights is incredible to me. And I have no idea how to utilize the color treatment options. I've only recently mastered white balance and now I can screw with individual channels. I'm drunk with power.

But I don't know think I've achieved a tasteful balance between maintaining the integrity of the photo and bringing out the best in it. I'm wary of my photos looking fake and yet I also know some really great photography has that quality to it. For instance I am going through my photos from New York City, where I was shooting a lot of buildings. I edit the shots such that the sky and the buildings are probably exposed but then everything looks like an HDR shot. I reduce the vibrance and saturation a bit to counter that effect. I really like what I made but think people will see it as "oh that's a cool Photoshop" and not "oh that's a nice picture."

Maybe I just need the self-confidence to go with what I think looks best.

I'm curious to see what the board thinks about this stuff.
21 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>2713008
>un-fucking blown highlights

You can't.
>>
>>2713014
>You can't.

I'm new to the terminology. I guess they're not actually blown out but just brighter than looks good.

I guess blown out means truly unrecoverable and forever white?
>>
>>2713014
You can recover detail in an area so long as there is at least one channel that is not maxed at 255. Don't be a pedantic shitface.

>>2713008
OP, just practice, and do what looks right to you. Do an edit, and if you think it's too heavy, get up and walk away. Come back 20 minutes later, and if it looks bad to you, then fix it. There's no way you would be perfect at it to start off with. Just go slowly, and make yourself happy.

That being said, a lot of photos handle heavy post processing very well. And conversely, a lot of photos don't. It will be situational. But you should always try to avoid hard clipped highlights, ugly crushed blacks, and heavy clarity. Remember that most people know what items in the world look like, so don't try to pass off weird blue trees, or green skin, etc.

File: ambientturquoise.jpg (160KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
ambientturquoise.jpg
160KB, 2560x1440px
All you need is photoshop and a cell phone
23 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
File: 1349391754839.jpg (154KB, 960x796px) Image search: [Google]
1349391754839.jpg
154KB, 960x796px
>>2712922
Good luck photographing birds, sports, subjects at night, macro, timelapse. Also using flashes, being technically creative, changing perspective...
>>
The only one I'd care about in that list is night photography, but you can mimic night in photoshop.
>>
>>2712934
>you can mimic night in photoshop

Wow. Why would you take photos at all. You can just mimic shit in photoshop.

Excuse my complete ignorance, but I have bought a second hand "EX Sigma 24-70mm f. 2.8 DG HSM" for my Nikon D600, but when I try to mount it, it does not fit at all. Am I doing something wrong or it's just that the objective is not compatible with the camera? This is my first camera, so I'm a complete uga-buga.

Pic related is my camera and the objective.
20 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>2712809
That looks like the Canon version of the Sigma lens. If that is the case, it will not fit
>>
>>2712811
Thanks, anon. I'm a complete idiot.
>>
>average Nikon user

File: concert.jpg (70KB, 848x566px) Image search: [Google]
concert.jpg
70KB, 848x566px
Hey /p/, hope everyone enjoyed their thanksgiving. I will be photographing two shows in about three weeks in NYC for the first time, a friend of a friend is hooking me up with some tickets and press passes and I'm pretty stoked. I will be shooting with my Canon 6D and nifty fifty (50mm 1.8). I have a range of other lenses I could use, but they are all pretty shitty and can't stop down very low... anyway, what kind of white balance should I be using to photograph the bands? The lighting is constantly changing... Any advice would be appreciated. Also general concert/show photography thread
66 posts and 32 images submitted.
>>
File: url.jpg (80KB, 600x390px) Image search: [Google]
url.jpg
80KB, 600x390px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareQuickTime 7.7.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2012:04:30 11:28:39
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width600
Image Height390
>>
I go M and find some settings that are close to what I want and fix everything in post. I'd rather not miss a moment while I'm changing settings.
>>
>>2712581
do you use a custom white balance? or just roll with fluorescent or incandescent?

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [552] [553] [554] [555] [556] [557] [558] [559] [560] [561] [562] [563] [564] [565] [566] [567] [568] [569] [570] [571] [572] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.