Post your favorite book. Others recommend you an album based on it.
Life Without Buildings -Any Other City
Growth of the soil by Hamsun
Frankenstein
favorite pictures of your favorite artists
Welcome to the weekly /mu/ jazz Blindfold Test thread. Every Friday and Saturday.
Yesterday's thread died, so here is a continuation thread for today.
>>68297656
If you're new, the point of these threads is to have fun and encourage critical listening, discussion, and general enjoyment of jazz. All critical music listeners are welcome. The more participation we have, the more fun and successful these threads will be. In the interest of keeping the thread alive and bumped, any general jazz discussion is welcomed here as well.
For more information about how the threads work and listening suggestions, please refer to the pastebin: http://pastebin.com/UiCCG28N
THIS WEEK'S THEME: Playing With Myself
COMPILED BY: Jazzpossu
NEXT WEEK: ???
COMPILED BY: ???
If you missed last week's thread, DON'T WORRY. It's not too late. Here are the links for the mystery tracklist. Download the tracks, record your thoughts/guesses/evaluations for each one, and then come back and post them in the thread. Remember, people will be posting guesses and thoughts in this thread so don't read the thread until you have listened to the music and collected your thoughts in order to avoid spoilers. Track info for this week's tracks will be posted on Saturday, so if you see the thread is close to dying before then, give it a bump.
http://www71.zippyshare.com/v/XNBQSght/file.html
Posting with names or tripcodes is encouraged as it makes discussion much easier.
bumping by myself
>Track 1
Well this track is interesting. I wouldn't say I enjoy it, but I am curious. Is it as old as the style of music suggests? Is it all one guy, or are there a few musicians? If it -is- a particularly old recording, then it's interesting from a historical perspective.
I did hear recently that Les Paul was one of the first musicians to experiment with multitracking back before the days of electric recording methods, by recording himself playing along to a gramophone record of himself. I wonder if this is an example of a similar technique? Certainly some of the instruments sound very bassy, as if a lot of frequencies have been lost in the re-recording process.
Musically it was dull though, so if it was anything other than proof of concept then it was a waste of time. Still, nice job surprising me; I was expecting 10 tracks of wanky fusion.
>Track 2
Having mentioned Les Paul, I wonder if this is him? Not sure if any of the instruments are overdubbed here - maybe the guitars, but it's hard to tell. On the other hand, it's pretty clear that the vocalist has been doubled up (or more), and the effect is pretty psychedelic - I like it. Pleasant enough guitar playing too, and the overall sound makes this worthwhile, though I certainly wouldn't choose it normally if I was in a jazz mood. Definitely sounds ahead of its time though. Jazzpossu mentioned last week how some of these tracks blur the line between jazz and pop, and I'm not even sure which side of it this one comes down on.
>>68313985
>Track 3
I think this is a violin dubbed over itself, but the effect is almost like a multi-reed instrument. Awesome to then hear a guy shrieking down his flute - normally I'd think of the sax as being the instrument most capable of taking on the sound of the human voice, but maybe that's just due to conventions of how each instrument "should" be played? Again this piece leaves me wondering what was overdubbed and what wasn't - surely everything other than the violins were live? I would definitely check out more of this album, seems like a catchy take on free jazz ideas.
>Track 4
A Monk tune, but I can't remember the title. Trying to count and I think there are three different tracks here, panned right/centre/left (glad I switched to headphones for this playlist). This piece is glorious, and the most interesting question to me is what order the tracks were recorded in. I think it's reasonable to guess that the right one was first, but the others I can't tell. I wonder how he recorded this - did he have a chance to familiarise himself with each track before recording the next, or was it all completely spontaneous? In any case I love the effect this gets. Monk's compositions lend themselves really well to things like tape loops and rondo forms and multitracking like this - maybe because of how much they made use of minimalist techniques like repetition and minor variation in the first place?
>these threads are for gospel, rhythm & blues, funk, modern funk, deep funk, Norther funk, soul, Northern soul, neo-soul, blue-eyed soul, PBR&B, disco, nu disco, black or white, old or new, just anything groovy not already covered on the board.
What have you been spinning lately?
https://youtu.be/UJLhG8YKbII
hi
https://youtube.com/watch?v=hwu4aw_U4H4
https://youtu.be/BKmw9UrX99s
i really want /groove/ to thrive...
>>68312975
it just occured to me that babyhuey&babysitters is kinda like nmh in how both band play the shit out of whatever they do. hm. do you see that or am i being dumb?
How to get into Sunn O)))? First albums?
What do you think of them? Any concert experiences?, etc. etc.
To get the real experience (or as close as you can get without seeing them live):
Get some GOOD speakers and subwoofer.
Unplug the headphones.
Point the speakers at you.
Max volume.
Play.
>>68312624
I found the best Sunn O))) album to start with, or the one that sold me on them was White2
https://sunn.bandcamp.com/album/white2-2
I was on a noise kick a while ago and this was on repeat.
>tfw martin shkreli has more money than kanye west
why is kanye flexing tho
>>68312601
how would shkreli flex in a way that he doesnt look like an idiot
>>68312632
I've seen him standing so I'm surprised that he can sit without looking like a total idiot.
rappers flex regardless of wealth
shkreli doesn't need to flex
Post top 10 artists/groups and people guess shit about you.
>MF DOOM
>Anticon
>Death Grips
>Nujabes
>Coltrane
>Madlib
>Bill Evans
>El-P
>GY!BE
>Miles Davis
you wish you were black
>>68312346
10/10
>>68312346
/thread
Now that the dust has settled- thoughts on this /mu/?
its SHIT
>>68312298
Not bad not great
an average rap album by a token average rap artist that has already been forgotten for months
you'd be pressed finding any list remembering it come december
My music tastes clash with everyone i know except you, /mu/
I hate when i try and share whatever music i'm digging at the moment, and my friend will shit on it, one of the only things keeping me lifted. It pisses me off sometimes. Not asking anyone to like it, but ti say that it sucks is asking for an argument. I just wanna fuckin share it you know?
Pic related to those hostile to my tunes >:(
just don't talk music to them.
my friends all have very different music tastes, so if I find an album I like I know I'll be able to talk about it with at least one of them.
if not, then it's all mine :3
is your music taste particularly 'out-there'?
what albums are you diggin?
go to concerts
meet people
marry a patrician qt
>>68312238
Just some type o negative for halloween. Nothing too out there. Friend is a dadrockfag who thinks the classic rock stations are the bible and anything after the 80's is trash
I thought this album was supposed to be good /mu/. Instead I got a few decent tracks with 2 maybe 3 standouts and a LOT of garbage and filler. Shit like Add Some Music to Your Day and At My Window are embarrassingly bad. Pretty much anything involving Bruce Johnston should have been erased.
Thoughts on this album? Am I missing something? Also is any of their other post 60s material good? I enjoyed everything in their discography up to this point.
Check this one out senpai
All I wanna do is proto dream pop
>>68312150
>add some music to your day
>bad
Terrible taste.
What' /mu/'s opinion of Bernie Sanders' folk album?
I just went through all ten pages of /mu/ and there is not a single thread worth clicking on, I'm only replying to this one because it was the first thread on page one
It was a product of a more hopeful era
>>68312034
of course it's folk
Which bands have absolutely horrible vocals but still sound good? Is that even possible?
>>68312028
Debatably - the red hot chili peppers
Calvin Johnson can't sing for shit, but it works so well with the rest of the sound.
/mu/, do you think that there's an album released in the past few years (2010+) that will be celebrated in the way ITAOTS was?
I.e. an album widely ignored and receives mixed reviews upon release, but subsequently leaves a legacy and a cult following and is later considered a classic
They are a guilty pleasure of mine actually
WHICH ONE OF YOU FAGGOTS DID THIS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=380zwj9RIgg
also autechre general
first for ouddekker
>>68311925
Eh, I feel a lot of his criticisms were pretty fitting. I love the album, but I feel like some tracks were too long and was obnoxiously unmelodic a lot of the time.
>>68312972
Do you pronounce autechre wrong to be contrarian?
Why does /mu/ hate metal?
Because /mu/ is good at following rule 2.
>>68311862
hell be fine
It's the music of edgy kids and manchildren.