Anyone know where I can obtain free reliable audio books? More specifically the dune series?
ah nvm let this thread die
i found it
dune is on youtube
a lot of shit is on youtube
What jobs can one get in writing? People always just say "start a blog" but what the fuck is that all about, who gives a shit about a random blog?
How easy it to work for BuzzFeed? I'll sell my soul IDGAF
>>7688438
Go to school for sociology, or just research Critical Theory in depth. Become, if at all possible, weak in some way, display said weakness, be biting, incisive against the powers that be, sarcasm is a must, mixed with a heartfelt humanism and caring for others and oneself amid this trying grief. You are halfway there. Now present a controversial topic, not to yourself, or those whose opinions you follow, to the enemy, what will make the enemy mad? Find the thing they hate the most, it isn't hard, you just have to circle the alt-right or MRA or something internet for a week or two. They complain about 3 or 4 things which will in all likelihood never happen. Bring up one of those exact things. The MRA, or altright or whoever will flip their collective shit, your tribe will flip their own collective shit, twitter wars will be had, tears of oppression will be shed, death threats will be hinted at, at least 4 opeds on semi-respectable journals and 200 blog posts on the raging man and womandom internet spheres will be raged. You will potentially if you do something even more outrageous be backed by people who hate the people you're upsetting enough to fund it make at least enough to do a talk show.
Results may vary
>>7688458
bretty gud analysis dare bud
>>7688438
you're stupid, the point is not to have the blog, but a portfolio
one would normally write for a uni paper but if you're looking for a job now i assume that route is not for you
About 100 pages into Brief wonderous life of oscar wao. I've avoided (not purposefully but quite easily) most of the fashionable multicultural lit (with the exception of Rushdie, Soyinka, other genuinely talented writers) for a long time, so finally, I decided "what could it hurt" and rented this book out with the intention of giving it an honest chance (despite my disdain for the literary establishment).
I usually don't come on here because it is as much of a cesspool as we all say it is and the median level of intelligence you can expect from a discussion is often woefully low (despite people's desperate posturing to contradict that in appearance).
I'm curious to hear any of your opinions on Oscar Wao, but I'd really like to avoid the obligatory 'cuck this cuck that niggerbaby blue' bullshit. I'm not really enjoying it. For the life of me, I can't understand why this won the Pulitzer. It's boring, for one, and reads like a young adult book because Diaz can't write for 5 pages without injecting some kind of cartoonish romance into the narrative. The characters aren't believable, lack dimension, etc. The incessant street-slang and boring colloquial similes are, unsurprisingly, boring. Issues like the race, class, government, etc. are dealt with immaturely (not just ironically, but without significant insight).
I'd honestly like for someone to explain to me why this book has received so many godamn accolades and why Diaz is lauded as a literary icon when the book is so goddamn mediocre?
hey fuckers cmon
>All of philosophy is baseless crap because the Münchhausen trilemma exists and we cannot know nothing
>Anyone who says that novels are anything more than an entertainment is probably someone in the academia /publishing/ media industry who wants to mysticism / justify his job for personal gain
>the philosophers who are hard to understand are all talking shit
>history can be extremely entertaining but any attempt to draw general principles from it is always either pretentious posturing or motivational quote tier banality
You know all of the above is true.
I don't.
>>7688356
>the philosophers who are hard to understand are all talking shit
ideas and concepts can be extremely complex. it might not be rocket science, but having a multitiered and multifaceted thought process can bring you multiple branches and conclusions that vary from circumstance to circumstance. Philosophy, moral and practical is very very complex. and if something has to be said in a different way to make it work; for example, if something one said has to be reworded or altered to make it more precise and clear to make more sense, then that doesnt make it "hard to understand", you just have to keep up with ever changing variables and circumstances.
>>7688356
>>All of philosophy is baseless crap because the Münchhausen trilemma exists and we cannot know nothing
Knowledge needn't be absolute, only functional in its context
>>Anyone who says that novels are anything more than an entertainment is probably someone in the academia /publishing/ media industry who wants to mysticism / justify his job for personal gain
Mysticism is the core of all understanding, being, and everything in general
>>the philosophers who are hard to understand are all talking shit
They invent obscure ways of talking because they are trying to express something fundamentally obscure and recognize the paucity of natural language, the use of new and complex terms and systems is to step away from common understanding and hint at the unintelligible that they need to express
>>history can be extremely entertaining but any attempt to draw general principles from it is always either pretentious posturing or motivational quote tier banality
Mostly true. History is only analogy, there is a pseudo-science and a mystic interpretation of trends, and they yield varying results.
For any anons who're in the tristate area looking for this masterpiece I saw a few at the strand today.
the srand fucking sux to be h
>>7688168
>the strand sucks to be honest
Anyway I love the strand, but I don't get to go to it that often which is probably why. I just ducked in really quickly while rushing to a date and lucked out.
Where can I find the english version of the Complete Manual on Suicide?
>>7687796
Please respond
Can David Foster Wallace think? Can he write? Does he have any discernable talent?
Discuss.
nah he killed himself so you can disregard all his work. not the kind of thing you want to put in your head.
Talentless hack.
>>7687492
>write something like This Is Water
>almost verbatim say people lacking this sort of consciousness are why they commit suicide
>kill self
kek top
Should I avoid using as?
And, to be clear, I mean it in this sense.
>‘They’ve seen me!’ yelped Beim, stifling a scream as he tried to yank himself up.
It seems incredibly awkward and cheap as a way of putting two actions in a sentence.
That example sentence is an all-around mess, but yeah, "as" doesn't really help its case
>>7687066
I'm not good at English, but just do shit like: " , yanking himself up"
A gerund, I think?
>>7687072
>>7687073
This is the kind of stuff I really struggle with.
Which of the two tweaks works better?
>‘They’ve seen me!’ yelped Beim, stifling a scream. He squeezed the rail and tried yanking himself out of the firing line...
>‘They’ve seen me!’ he stifled a scream and tried yanking himself up to safety.
Well guys i want a good book to start with Isaac Asimov,any suggestions?
Enjoy
>>7686912
I, Robot. At least read this before the Robot novels, which in turn read before the Foundation novels.
Don't
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/11289765/The-Hobbit-How-the-clomping-foot-of-nerdism-destroyed-Tolkiens-dream-and-the-fantasy-genre.html
>An entire generation of fantasy novels was predicated on the idea that a coherent world was more important than an interesting literary text, and in a society where our consumer habits have increasingly become our identities, there is a ready-made audience for books which reward the archivist reader.
Does he have a point? Is world building largely pointless and unnecessary? Is a story more important than knowing each character's entire bloodline, their family's occupations, and who cleans the toilets in your genre novel's universe?
In scifi and fantasy you have to have a good and original world. In other literature it's pointless.
>>7689443
>Is world building largely pointless and unnecessary
depends on what you do with it
modern fantasy writers have taken the surface trappings of the stuff(genealogies, shit tonne of dates, names, lands and their histories etc) to be the essence of world building. what tolkien did was to create a set of themes and motifs into the history of middle-earth that repeated over and over in different ways, which gave even the smallest story in the universe a place and context within a larger whole.
This is why I stay with the classics. I'll take the Moorcock over Sandersons RPG fiction any day.
The time is ripe to detach from a life devoid of meaning and set out for union of the soul with God instead. Who's with me? Meister here on the left seems to have been.
Read Plotinus lad
read
http://www.christianperfection.info/tta78.php
https://archive.org/stream/MN41530ucmf_5#page/n748/mode/1up
Avoid Quietism, i.e. the practice of retreating from all activity in order to passively "immerse" yourself in God. This is the "quick and easy" mysticism. It has always been popular in the East. It gives you a false sense of divinity; it allows you to fell like you are One with God. This is a delusion though.
There is a passive state in the higher stages of the Spiritual Life where God unites Himself to the soul by love, and at that point you do temporarily cease from action to allow God to act in your soul. But this is a TEMPORARY state and one of intense love, sweetness, consolation. It is not a constant state of apathy that goes on indefinitely. In order to arrive at it you have to first practice prayer, meditation, penance, fasting, mortification, almsigiving, abstaining from sin in general, and cultivating the virtues. The reason that God does not immediately communicate Himself to the soul is because that would result in gross pride. If you could just sit down whenever you felt like it and "empty yourself" and God would come, you would feel like you had already arrived at perfection. God does not come to people who are lazy, lustful, proud, envious, etc. The reason for this is, for example, if God gave Himself to a lazy person, the lazy person would use His sweet communication with God as an excuse not to fulfil his duties in life. The same goes for any other vice. You have to exercise yourself spiritually, normally for years. God does give consolation/sweetness even to beginners at the very beginning of the spiritual life, but this is to draw them away from the world and reassure them in the beginning. As soon as the beginner makes his first proper steps God stops sending so many consolations in order to test the beginner's love for Him, because the point of the spiritual life is to love God for His own sake, not for His gifts.
>>7686941
This anon, speaks wisdom.
So I need a creative name for this character I'm going to make a short story about. However I can't think of a real good one at all and I need some help or suggestions on how to get one.
It'd be great if guys could suggest a medieval first name and surname for this man. A name that could relate to the guy in this picture. (And not the actors name) Keep the name cool and unique please!
Ogi Bearclaw
>>7688994
Louis
I need a first and last name, please and thanks!
good history books/biographies about the Roman Empire and its rulers?
>>7686811
This is technically historical fiction but check out I, Claudius...it's a great book and written like the autobiography of Claudius.
I think you'd enjoy it, it has a lot of what you're looking for.
I lamented it in every gathering
I associated wih those in bad or happy circumstances
(But) every one became my friend from his (own) opinion
He did not seek my secrets from within me
My secret is not far from my lament
But eyes and ears do not have the light (to sense it)
Is this what they are calling poetry these days? What is this?
Are you from the 13th century?
I'll try and find a better translation.
He hath not lived here, who hath sober lived,
And he that dieth not drunk hath missed the mark.
With tears then let him mourn himself, whose life
Hath passed, and he no share of it hath had.
Why should I believe the sun will rise tomorrow?
>should
>believe
Nice spook faggot
what
>>7688271
whats a spook