Yes, I am a pleb.
Agreed.
Yes, OP. I absolutely will help you validate your self-worth by praising your obvious intellectual superiority based on the number of meme novels you pretend to like.
>>8657613
What does /lit/ think of Shogun?
asking since i picked it up recently
Also how is that book on the Tao?
This femanon commented on a thread on /b/ about the short stories she writes on a website and I bought her shit to read, so I'm gonna share it with you guys, because it's sexy as fuck.
>fapped
the one I bought is about her taking her step brothers virginity
wait for me to post the prints of the full story (pic came with the story)
Is it worth it to learn naval jargon just so i can read these books?
>>8675311
No because they look like shitty genre fiction anyway. Tbh though, I doubt you'd need to put to much effort in - its not like genre fiction authors can expect much intellectual exertion from the general public. In other words, I think learning naval jargon to read those books would be a waste of time, but if you're really intent on reading those books, you could probably do so without really learning too much.
Just read Moby Dick. Then you won't even want to read that shit afterwards, a win-win
I liked how my version of moby dick had some explanations to the jargon used in the back.
What is the anal with Kendra Lust of literature?
Moby Dick.
Happy to see Peterson and his ideas begin to propagate in the cultural consciousness.
Its like, go us, aye?
>>8674853
/lit/
Sam Harris, Stefan Molyneux
Wittgenstein, Heidegger
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer
Who wins: 21st century's top philosophers, 20th or 19th?
>>8674649
Stale bait, try again.
>>8674657
Kys
This anti schopenmeme board thing is old
>>8674649
generally speaking, one has to be a philosopher to be considered a top philosopher
I'm looking for formally experimental fantasy works. Anyone besides Gene Wolfe (whom I've been reading) that I need to check out?
>>8674575
Borges, although people wank on and off about if he is or isn't fantasy. Either way, you'll probably enjoy it if you like things that are not real and things that are experimental.
Wolfe and Borges are probably the best
I like Hemingway, Faulkner, and Steinbeck.
Call me pleb or whatever idgaf.
Rec me some authors.
For what it is worth...I think highly of Nabokov, but oftentimes his stuff is just too eccentric for me.
Cormac McCarthy if you haven't read his stuff already. Start with The Road, work your way up to Blood Meridian.
Flannery O'Connor
>>8674108
Thanks brother.
get her ugly ass face out of that
>>8674020
That pic is cringy as fuck.
What was going through her mind as she struck that pose
Is there any worth in analytic philosophy before the ~70s when they stopped being so autistic about logic and linguistics?
I'm always puzzled when I read big figures of analytic philosophy because they have an extremely narrow-minded view of what philosophy should be and what questions are meaningful. Isn't the major goal of so-called "continental" philosophy to examine precisely that which comes before language and grounds it, and to emphasize the societal relations that form the dominant ideology in any philosophical tradition?
Analytic philosophers seem to think that every philosophical problem is completely a-historical and can be answered by stating it clearly in the methods of formal logic. Are they actually unable to understand a thinker such as Heidegger, or do they just pretend in order to make fun of his ideas?
Welp, wrong picture.
>>8673987
>analytic philosophy
>stopped being autistic
I think it's worth reading them to understand their worldview, but logical positivism is definitely dead as fucking dead. Wittgenstein is making a bit of a comeback after having been crazy fashionable and then unfashionable because of how sick of people abusing him everyone was. Frege and Russell are still important in the philosophy of mathematics, and the Vienna Circle's program is at least interesting.
I think there's something valuable in trying to understand how these people were straining so hard to ground themselves in logical positivism and atomism. Personally their worldview is as alien to me as it seems to be to you, but that's exactly why I want to understand it.
It also has more roots and more branches than I might have thought. I started researching the Marburg neo-Kantians (as opposed to the squishy, Geisteswissenschaften-und-Hermeneutik Baden neo-Kantians), and there is a lot more there than meets the eye. They are not just precursors to Vienna. They are also making a comeback, btw.
I also think continentals go too far in the opposite direction themselves. I am a continentalfag by nature so I'm all about the geworfenheit and finitude and shit, but we have kind of reached a rut with it. Whenever I excitedly tell this one friend of mine that I've finally figured out Derrida or some shit, he always says something like "great! Now you understand Redundant Formulation #817-B of postmodern nihilism, aporia, and relativism!"
Why was this fan-fiction tier garbage given J K Rowling's stamp of approval and made canon?
>>8673919
Because Rowling doesn't give a shit about her own universe anymore.
I haven't read it but my friend worked on the Polish translation and says it's the worst job she's ever gotten.
I saw a gypsy reading it while waiting for the bus
Top tier trashbook for plebs
>>8673924
Find an epub/pdf version online. The whole thing will take you 1.5 to 2hrs max to read. Then you'll see how bad it is compared to the main HP books.
Lads, what is your favourite Ballard work?
Gonna have to say Atrocity Exhibition.
crash is the purest
Only read High-Rise and didn't particularly like it. Far too heavy-handed, is his other work similar or actually worth a read?
Do any of you do "morning pages" or a similar exercise everyday? Has it helped? I'm doing this at the moment but I'm only in my first week
http://www.writersdigest.com/qp7-migration-books/writing-better-lyrics-excerpt
>>8673795
>Do any of you do "morning pages" or a similar exercise everyday?
I try to fact check some of the people on this web site:
http://thezog.info/list-summaries/
every morning as a kind of crossword puzzle. So far I only found two or maybe three mistakes (people incorrectly identified as belonging to the wrong ethnic group) on the entire list.
>>8673795
I go to study literature, faggot. I write so much i think paragraphically. i don't need to do any of this queer shit to stay sharp. i breathe language.
After years of doing small pages here and there, I finally googled writers block techniques and found the worst cases of it so I could compare their methods.
In all instances, habit was the biggest factor, followed by 'just start writing, even if it's just a diary entry', and then of course lifestyle. Stress, exercise, sleep, etc.
What's working for me right now is setting a timer and trying to do two hours of solid writing a day. I can split this up into two hour chunks, or four half hour chunks, but unless I am feeling absolutely like garbage-in which case I will allow myself an hour to write, then I have to fucking do it. No matter what.
I plan to have a rough draft done in the next six months, and I've set myself to write, bare minimum, 2 chapters per week. Obviously if the story is finished before those six months, I will start editing, but I wanted to give myself plenty of room to be able to butcher, chop, and alter stuff without feeling like all those months of hard work produced nothing.
>He can't type at 85 wpm
>he doesn't type with only two fingers
1000 is the bear minimum hear, lad,
>>8673712
My language has long ass words.
What are some books both philosophical and fictional that help with the understanding of religion? What are some must reads? What books will help me apply religion to my daily life to live a good life?
Diary of st. Faustina
Interior of a Castle
The New Testament
>>8673716
Thanks Anon.
>>8673711
the consolation of philosophy by boethius
it was tremendously influential in the medieval ages
https://youtu.be/QKwMFas9XnY?t=5m56s
>Tfw I found /lit/
>>8673701
05:56 btw.
>>8673701
I remember watching this four years ago. You just found it?
>>8673727
he's young and new to all this so he doesn't know old content from new.
>h-hey it is at 05:56 btw.
lol