Any philosophy majors here?
How bad did i fuck up?
>>8702740
This was my moms favorite book 2 years ago.she only reads melodramatic female centric best-sellers
>>8702753
I mean how bad did i fuck up majoring in philosophy?
My girlfriend wants me to read that book.
>>8702775
>I mean how bad did i fuck up majoring in philosophy?
It depends, i majored in history but I ended up marrying a doctor so its all good. Do you have a girlfriend thats pre-med or applying to med school?
Alternately, if you want to live the /lit/ life thats fine, but are you european and debt free and able to live the NEET life?
Did you receive a full scholarship, are you minoring in pre-med or business?
Or are you from a middle class family and paying to read Kant. If so, kysor you know, change your major.
I love you guys
I love you /lit/
Thanks for making me smarter and introducing me to beauty
I love you all, even if you only come here once in a while
what's up with these threads lately? is this the same faggot every time?
also, don't kys, my man
beauty is pretty worthless
>>8702689
It's the only thing worth living for
What do you think about lying faggots that insult nations?
What? What did the book do to hurt your butt?
>>8702665
It is accepted as historical fact despite being full of lies. many people just get off on the edge, I have read some books that have north korean camps were they shove fists into pussies or women are bought and sold, then fucked as their monthers in law hold them down while the husband does the deed. if you are going to make shit up then don't sell it as historically accurate.
>>8702676
>It is accepted as historical fact
By who? It's marketed as fiction. I have never heard of it.
Anybody here unironically writing a manifesto or philosophical tract?
What's yours about? What topics does it cover?
Sensibility, pain, pleasure, discipline, sacrifice, submission, passion, time, plans, dissatisfaction, vengeance, ritual, piety, obsession, uncaniness, disgust
It's mostly a way for me to sort my own neuroses.
How materialism is a farse, defences on tradition and hierarchy, the legitimacy of social constructs and kultur, the sacred aspect of waifuism. There's more, but these are the themes I have fleshed out more or less.
>>8702788
Tell me more about the sanctity of waifuism.
How do I read the bible?
Do I just read straight away? Do I pick up an annotated version, and, if so, which one? I see people recommending either the oxford or the harper collins and don't know which one will be better for me.
I would recommend picking up The Jerusalem Bible and Jesus of Nazareth by Joseph Ratzinger as the preferred commentary.
>>8702487
Noted, thanks.
You really should pick up an annotated version. The Bible has a rich history and is full of interpretations so you need a solid understanding which you can get from introductions and annotations.
Personally, I'd recommend the Norton KJV one. People complain that it's outdated, but the Norton edition tells you which parts are mistranslations or obscure, so you can appreciate the great language while knowing what's accurate or not. However if you really don't wish to read 400 year old English, than Oxford will still be fine.
As for actually reading it, just dive right in. Although one technique I'd recommend is to first use this 61 day chronological reading plan which highlights the most important parts
https://www.biblegateway.com/reading-plans/chronological?version=NIV
You'll have a good sense of the shape of the Bible and its most important figures and themes. Then you can do a deeper reading of the books you're most interested in, which I hope would be all of them because while some parts are definitely more interesting than others to read, there's plenty of beauty and wisdom in almost all the books.
Note: I am not in any way an expert in the Bible or Christianity. This is just a common reader's opinion. If anyone has any learned objections to make to my advice, I'd actually welcome it very much.
Hello /lit/. I have been interested in philosophy for a long time, but i never got around to reading it. What are the absolute must-reads of philosophy and religious texts?
Fuck off, dumb frogposter.
>>8702461
go back to /r9k/.
Read Schopenhauer's 'On Women' and Elliot Rodger and have daily circlejerks there, frogposting scum
are there any stories similar to ken bone, where a regular person is put under intense scrutiny and under a magnifying glass, for no reason, no consequence, but forced to defend his whole life and mistakes? I guess the trial?
>>8702355
Survivor by Paluhniuk
You just paraphrased the plot. I realize how unfortunate the author is.
>>8702355
wait who's this Bone chap?
>>8702392
an ugly man in a dated sweater that asked a question that is not relevant to his fame. a useless blip in this terrible campaign season. a living meme that wont be remembered by anyone
>Besides Noam Chomsky...
No one's quite like David Foster Wallace, I'm afraid.
Interesting challenge--writers who lack depth and are viewed as deep by shallow people, chase fads, have only the most fashionable opinions, and died too soon...
Hemingway?
JL and the Mona Lisa have the same mouth.
Which horror authors have the best atmospheric and scary prose? The kind that if they describe whatever ordinary and mundane thing it would actually make it much scarier than it really is.
>>8702346
Halloween is over. We can all stop trying to think of horror works that arent Stephen King or early 20th century pulp writers that are worth anything, because there arent. Inb4 ligotti, he is a one trick pony.
>>8702346
Lovecraft, the only right answer.
Inb4 some contrarian shitstain comes and pukes out a retarded argument
>>8703820
When, long ago, the gods created Earth
In Jove's fair image Man was shaped at birth.
The beasts for lesser parts were next designed;
Yet were they too remote from humankind.
To fill the gap, and join the rest to Man,
Th'Olympian host conceiv'd a clever plan.
A beast they wrought, in semi-human figure,
Filled it with vice, and called the thing a Nigger.
hey /lit/, I know you hate people coming here with their poorly written assignments but I'm not a native speaker and I just need to some quick pointers. would love some help
you can probably discern the intended tone from the text I'll be posting but I just want it to flow a little better and to improve anything that seems unclear
Choice of material and attitudes to time
When a figure is sculpted in marble there’s a certain kind of permanence involved, not necessarily because of the historical connotations that are usually associated with marble but due to its’ material properties. Marble hardens over time, so it’s no surprise that it was the material of choice when sculptors were giving those cardinal virtues a physical analogue. It doesn’t matter wether we’re talking about of the strong moral character or their translucent marble , both were undoubtedly made to stay fast.
In the last century or so there have been artists who’ve stressed the ephemeral qualities of their materials, either by presenting something that has already been damaged beforehand or by incorporating the on-going decay as a part of the artistic expression. Damien Hirst’s For the Love of God could be seen as a response to both classical and contemporary constructions; marble giants standing tall for eons to come and objects disintegrating before our very eyes, speaking of the inevitable decay that affects all matter. This icon of death is made out of stuff even sturdier than marble but does it follow that it’s safe from the weathering of time because of its’ diamond encrusted exterior? While resembling more a piece of gaudy objet d’art there’s still some irony in knowing it’ll be the only surviving work if the museum was to catch fire and burn down. A crude joke sitting unscathed in the smoldering rubble, as if it was the immanent quality of the work itself that ensured it safe passage.
>>8702290
I am against Chads, Stacys, SJWs, egalitarians, roasties, libcucks, socialists, communists, vegetarians, normies, sexually active people, nonwhites, Semites, and sodomites
>>8702297
you wont be making many friends with that attitude
>>8702308
>implying the attitude didn't come as a response to social ostracization
Thought on this book?
Do you think it's better than Ulysses?
wouldn't say better but Portrait is awesome desu.
I think most people who have read Ulysses would say it's better. I just found it to be more memorable. I can only remember a few parts of portrait
If I found this boring will I like Ulysses?
Lit that evokes the same feeling of ecstasy as cracking open a frosty Coke on a hot summer's day?
Any recs? The closest I have come to this feeling is from reading Stoner.
>ecstasy
>reading Stoner
lmao
>>8702220
I drank 14,000 cokes over the past year and i think i have major intestinal damage
My whole life I've been a fraud :D
trash thread. rethink your actions, young memester.
I'm not exaggerating :D
Pretty much all I've ever done all the time is try to create a certain impression of me in other people :D
I listened to the first 35 minutes if pic / link related and it was all bs. All he does is operate in his own self referential miasma of definitions and criticise others based on his own definitions. Every time he raises his head out of the self referential swamp to comment on something in practice, he can only say something trivial or easily refuted after one second of thought.
What went wrong? This is horrendous.
https://youtu.be/07Ys4tQPRis
>>8701999
Enjoy going to prison because you didn't call some bitch "zhe".
>>8701999
>not getting the point-the post
>>8701999
I feel like he doesn't come off well on interviews, especially around this area. He is not an expert on the area, but he is clearly still trying to formulate and express himself within the confines of the dialogue with which he is forced to engage.
Try some of his lectures on his YouTube account. I really like the 'Necessity of Virtue' and 'Slaying your Dragons'.
Why do people think this book is so deep?
Like his prose is cool but it's not hard to read, and the book isn't that deep.
tell us what you think it was about
protip: you missed most of it
>>8701982
A woman who falls in love with the mythic Tristero + and conspiracy around it (hence the irony in her meeting the Inamorati Anonymous guy)