I used to be very imginative as a kid and wrote a lot but I haven't done it in like 10 years so I don't even know where to start from..I'm thinking about writing it in third person and styling it like a japanese light novel
>styling it like a japanese light novel
In that case you don't need to know anything about writing.
Here's all I thought up so far
It's going to be a self-made novel about a group of teenagers living a high school life. All the characters are based on real life people, but in this context they are completely fictional. The story will be told in third person and styled like a japanese light novel. Each chapter will tell the story of a different character in his/her point of view. It's falls into the category of romance, drama and fantasy. Most of the events will be based on dreams I've had.
>>9967191
yes by light novel I meant the very simple amateurish writing style, heavy on dialougue, basically the stuff you see in fanfictions
Would this trigger you, /lit/?
>>9967144
This would. Pencilled or penned notes also get me. WHO does this in fiction books, and WHY?
>>9967156
people actually reading, retard
>>9967156
probably PhD students who write 'scientific' articles
It's Picnic at Hanging Rock. Maybe here was the answer to what happened, I don't know. Just found it.
More like this
>>9967124
wtf is that?
>>9967342
A reading chart for /x/philes I guess.
Ann Pancake - Given Ground
Donald Ray Pollock - Knockemstiff
Rudolph Wurlitzer - Rudolph Wurlitzer
Bonnie Jo Campbell - American Salvage
Breece D'J Pancake - The Stories of Breece D'J Pancake
Frank Stanford - The Singing Knives
Can anyone recommend anything similar to these works that isn't McCarthy, Faulkner, O'Connor or any of the more standard Southern Gothic fare?
I think these books all capture a distinct atmosphere, something I'm sure you'll agree with if you've read one or more. If you have read and enjoyed one of them, I think you should check out at least one other.
>>9967094
*Rudolph Wurlitzer - The Drop Edge of Yonder or Nog
>>9967094
Town Smokes by Pinckney Benedict
Controlled Burn by Scott Wolven
Joe; Fay and Father and Son by Larry Brown
Poachers by Tom Franklin
I Hate to See the Evening Sun Go Down by William Gay
A Feast of Snakes by Harry Crews
>>9967268
Appreciate the post, thanks. I'm familiar with Crews and Gay but the rest is new to me. All exactly along the lines of what I was looking for. Got Town Smokes on order and the others added to my list.
Somebody give me a quick rundown on this guy
>>9967092
He was an intense mothefucker. There's no way a rundown can be done, trust me. Just consider his post-doctoral thesis was rejected byMax Horkheimer atthe University of Frankfurt because 'it was impossible to understand' and 'too obscure'. And that was just the beginning of Benjamin's career, a humble and synthetic overview of the History of Philosophy.
You could check it out, though. It's called The Origin of German Tragic Drama.
How 'mystic' is he exactly?
Makes me not want to read him.
>>9967224
That happened when he was older and paranoic (running away rom the Nazis). Also because of his heavy substance abuse. Anyway, he keeps ir interesting and philosophically relevant.
Is this a good book or pop culture bullshit?
Reading it now, desu.
In brief: "The state turned me into a societal degenerate but then I found a socially degenerate religion and basically we wuz kangz n sheeeit, fuck white people"
>>9967073
It's fan fiction but aimed a different order of retard. Instead of teenage girls it appeals to self-flagellating NYT-subscribers and resentful black folks who want to blame white people for their personal failures
It's an interesting read, at least for insight to a mindset that I have no chance of encountering in real life.
How does one get into reading verse and poetry? I have always loved novels and prose but I have never been exposed to much poetry – recently I've been taking stabs in the dark at pieces of Chaucer, or other mid-millenium english poetry, but I don't quite know how to enjoy reading it. Should I start with something less complicated and in more modern language? Did you naturally find comfort and appreciation in poetry, or did you develop it?
>>9967029
You need to read it slower than most stuff. I have to be in the right mood to read poetry.
>>9967039
do you have any recommendations for interesting things to read?
Mamma mia! Books of burgers are sure a shitpile!
Vergas llosa
>>9967009
What's app with my uncle Mario?
One of Vargas Llosa's favourite novelists, and arguably the most influential on his writing career, is the American William Faulkner.[132] Vargas Llosa considers Faulkner "the writer who perfected the methods of the modern novel".[
>read this expecting Dino kino
>instead get DUDE CHAOS THEORY LMAO
Are there any readable books that are actually about dinosaurs?
the lost world
>>9966982
Chaos theory was a very minor part of that book. I don't know what you're complaining about.
>>9966982
Just watch the movie instead of reading books like a loser.
>tfw you get an awkward boner and you can't make it go away
>tfw your dick's so small that a protudring boner isn't even an issue for you
>tfw your briefs keep it constrained
>not embracing boners
Just saving one author from oblivion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Spitz
do the same for one obscure author
Another Jacque
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Barzun
I wish to have a sharp a mind as he when I'm 100.
>>9967024
>105 years
noice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janko_Poli%C4%87_Kamov
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ji%C5%99%C3%AD_Kar%C3%A1sek_ze_Lvovic
two obscure central european poets who were writing about suffering and sexual pleasure
i've been reading her more obscure essays and it's a lot of repackaged philosophy (Kant, Stirner, Nietzsche) and i'm not really sure how much she originated? have i wasted my time /lit/?
>>9966975
Yes, you absolutely have wasted your time if you were expecting some kind of deep philosophy. I liked Fountainhead but I don't understand the Randian cult at fucking all.
>>9966975
>I don't understand the Randian cult at fucking all
why? it's really simple.
she's telling you that it is not only okay to follow your own personal interests in every single facet of your life, it's actually vital for the fate of mankind. selfishness is next to godliness.
>>9966975
ayn rand is for insecure losers. go to stirner if you want something more realistic.
not to say caring about yourself above all is a bad thing, but her moralistic take on it is fucking retarded and tailored for massive faggots.
Let's face it, the only reason this board focuses so much on his oversimplification of postmodernism, which is only a small fragment of the work he presents, is that they cannot contend with the rest of his ideas.
Peterson's lectures and writings don't simply make one contend with harsh truths about the universe, they also present genuine solutions to these problems. This can he demonstrated empirically through the success of his self authoring program. However, most /lit/-posters are highly introverted, lazy, and have little to no drive to genuinely self improve. Peterson's ideas present the /lit/-poster with actionable, measurable steps to improve their lot in life, going beyond the mere intellectual circlejerk presented in the majority of discussions on the board. This terrifies the /lit/-poster. So he resorts to attacking the one element of Peterson's philosophy that is easy to criticize. This is a mistake.
In other words: sort yourselves out, buckos.
>>9966959
'sort yourself out' is pure neo-liberal ideology.
No, because why focus on Jungianism, might as well argue with wiccans.
there's already a thread for this charlatan
what should i read to seem and sound like an intelectual even though not being one?
>>9966950
Atlas Shrugged
The God Delusion
Wall-Street and the Bolshevik Revolution
>>9966950
>sound like an intelectual even though not being one
Literally me.
Just become an autodidact my man.
What's the difference between this version and the original? Is (((abridged))) cucked?
>>9966812
>cucked
Great thread
cuck cuck cucks cuck
The Abridged cuts out the parts that proves the Democratic Party was involved in the Gulags.