i've been reading her more obscure essays and it's a lot of repackaged philosophy (Kant, Stirner, Nietzsche) and i'm not really sure how much she originated? have i wasted my time /lit/?
>>9966975
Yes, you absolutely have wasted your time if you were expecting some kind of deep philosophy. I liked Fountainhead but I don't understand the Randian cult at fucking all.
>>9966975
>I don't understand the Randian cult at fucking all
why? it's really simple.
she's telling you that it is not only okay to follow your own personal interests in every single facet of your life, it's actually vital for the fate of mankind. selfishness is next to godliness.
>>9966975
ayn rand is for insecure losers. go to stirner if you want something more realistic.
not to say caring about yourself above all is a bad thing, but her moralistic take on it is fucking retarded and tailored for massive faggots.
the rape scenes are the only original bits. they're like 0.25% of the books
>>9967301
does she have a rape fetish or is rape somehow okay in her ideology
>female author
>>9967343
>ayn rand
>female
>pick one
She said Aristotle and Victor Hugo were some of her biggest influences. So read them instead
>>9966975
Murray Rothbard broke off relations with her after she told him to divorce his wife because she was Christian.
>>9966975
I don't get why people like her. Her work is long, and stale, and if you're looking for something specific, or even all of her "philosophy" you can find them in better places.
Reading an economics textbook from your local uni will get you more into capitalism.
Somewhere in between