Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 757. page

Nuclear weapons were used in the same war that some soldiers carried swords into battle

Jeanne Calment met Van Gogh, saw the Eiffel Tower being built and contributed on a rap album in 1996.

File: 1903_cover[1].jpg (87KB, 640x912px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 640x912px

Which is older? The World Series or the Kingdom of Norway?

That's right! The World Series!

File: Coppergate.jpg (663KB, 1280x1920px) Image search: [Google]

663KB, 1280x1920px

>>3020718
tbf it does look very similar to this one uncovered in england

File: Sutton Hoo.jpg (1MB, 2848x2136px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2848x2136px

>>3020718
>>3020765
and this one as well of course

We do?

File: 1478904634078.jpg (385KB, 912x1280px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 912x1280px

>ancient
>1800s

File: 5.png (343KB, 500x600px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 500x600px

>>3020468
Maud Fealy

>>3019958
Mesopotamia is a pretty broad term. Do you mean Sumer? Babylonia? Akkadian Empire? Assyria?

>>3019958
Mesopotamia by far. Egypt is overrated. Even now Iraq is King of the East. Egypt is Western and degenerate.

I'd say Mesopotamia. They exerted more external influence. Egypt was relatively insular. They were still an impressive culture, but I'd say the city states and empires coming from Mesopotamia influenced the world more.

File: AS17-134-20507.jpg (149KB, 904x907px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 904x907px

Top segment is from this photo. It's interesting where the ruins came from?

>>3019765
From the ancient civilization of Photoshop.

>>3019765
Your imagination

Also: https://www.englishgrammar101.com/

>>3019500
1. Yeah, if they were united and the Brits and French would have helped them instead of fucking them.
Comunist were a mistake.
2. That's what they did?

>>3019500
*won without Italian, German and Portuguese support.

>>3019504
>Brits and French would have helped
*chuckle*

>>>/pol/

File: f-dresden-b-20150215.jpg (702KB, 2567x3500px) Image search: [Google]

702KB, 2567x3500px

>>3019360
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>3019360
Right side of history is a misunderstood meme, it has nothing to with morals. According to marxists, history is materially predetermined and everything points towards communism, and every attempt to stop it is pointless because it cannot be stopped, therefore those who oppose it are on the "wrong side of history".

Marxists are brainlets btw if that wasn't obvious from what I just wrote

>>3018674
Wokehood: realizing that Calvinism is at once the best Protestant interpretation of the Christian cannon and a terrifying clusterfuck of moral luck.

File: IMG_9691.jpg (61KB, 463x684px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 463x684px

>>3018674
>makes More sense

Sure kid

>>3018787
Ascendence: Realizing that Mormonism is the truest Christianity

>>3018672
They almost did. Korea/Taiwan and Vietnam were under China. It was Japan and the Europeans that negotiated a treaty that freed them.

File: smilin-man-thinking_1149-1327.jpg (22KB, 338x310px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 338x310px

Why didn't the USA snowball and conquer the entire Vietnam?

Are you talking about in WW2 or during Ming?

>ww2
Because the world was sick of wars after Vietnam, and even though vietnam went communist, the communist movements moral was at an alltime low. people just wanted peace
>ming
Because jungles

>>3018479
The concept of whiteness did not exist until Isabella's destruction of Emirate of Granada.

File: mediterraneans-vs-snowpeople.jpg (485KB, 1440x844px) Image search: [Google]

485KB, 1440x844px

>>3018479
Snow people are naturally bitter. The cold weather has historically prevented them from becoming civilized without the help of superior Mediterraneans. It's a damn shame, too. If we hadn't civilized these snow barbarians they would still be dangling in trees. Now they have the nerve to LARP as the people who civilized them.

>>3018479
How's the GDP southern Europe?
Oh, Germany's bailing you out again?
Oh well, better luck next time you poor fuckers

>>3018128
Ah the Aryan """"""""""""""""""""master"""""""""""""""""""" race

>Le bash the ebil Nazi thread

Here's you (You)

>>3018138
triggered g*rman detected

>>3018105

you are describing states

>>3018105
There is one thing that I don't understand about America, that people completely think in state lines rather than cultural lines. For example, Pittsburgh area is culturally pretty much identical to West Virginia, eastern Kentucky and eastern Ohio, yet those areas are think of as "others" while Philadelphia is thought of as "us". It boggles the mind because in most of Europe and the rest of the world this would be unheard of, people outside of America base their identity almost exclusively on ethnic, cultural and economic basis and not imaginary lines on the map.

>>3018120
I don't know if I am wording anything correctly. I am thinking more in terms of the differences between say, Scotland and Wales in the UK, which is much wider than Texan and California in the US. What are the consequences of allowing the differences between U.S. states/regions to reach the level of difference that the Scots and the Welsh or between the Cantonese and the Uyghurs ?

There is hardly such thing as a real 'working class' today in an advanced capitalist society. The closest thing that exists are the illegal immigrants toiling on fields and in meat packing plants, but they're unable to effectively organize and are effective disenfranchised.

Because social reforms made work able to provide a comfortable life for the worker, and people want to keep what they make.

Communism only appeals to the extremely impoverished who feel like they will benefit from a redispersal of wealth. For most workers, even in today's society, this would be a net loss for capital.

Creature comforts and no semblance of class consciousness. Don't worry though, it won't last too long.

>>3017828

By 1939, the German economy was fully committed to rearmament. They were running a HUGE budget deficit, spending something like 50 times more than they were taking in. They kept this secret through some fancy accounting tricks, because they didn't want people to realize the full extent of their rearmament, and also because you'd never want people to know you're running a tremendous budget deficit like that. The Nazis also had a fairly generous welfare state to keep the German people from turning against him. One of Hitler's pet theories about Germany losing World War 1 (alongside "muh jews") was that he felt that shitty conditions for German civilians during the war caused morale to break down, resulting in Germany losing its will to fight. Hitler wanted to make sure that this breakdown of civilian morale wouldn't happen again. All of this is quite expensive, and unsustainable unless you're plundering other countries to pay for all of it.

>>3017958
Where did the money spent beyond their revenue come from?

>>3017958
So in the upcoming years the nazis would've apparently crumbled without a war. Interesting.
It is really fascinating that even with all of their resources committed to rearmament they still had a very nice orderly nation before the war and up till 1943. (after seeing many of the footages from back then.) I wonder then what could've hitler achieved if he didn't even invest in military? How rich could germany possibly be?

File: Barracks emperors.jpg (124KB, 704x724px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 704x724px

>>3017835
A list of the Barracks emperors gives some perspective

File: Fire after.jpg (166KB, 636x452px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 636x452px

>>3017894
Remnants of the Nemi ships, burned in WW2