>be under complete control of the Netherlands
>two thirds of the country speaks Dutch with one third speaking French
>French storm in and establish the entire area as "belgium" a literal non country that didn't exist because they wanted to establish a puppet state there
>Europe begrudgingly allows this state to exist as a buffer between the powers to keep the peace
>does nothing but desperately try to justify it's existence for half a century
>king hoaxes the entire world into giving him the entire Congo for "humanitarian reasons"
>abuses the populace in the most horrific ways imaginable
>state takes control of the Congo because the King was literally just slicing Africans up
>finally invaded by Germany en route to France
>Britain remembers it promised to look after this little shit
>causes the most devastating conflict in human history
>gets rewarded for this with stolen German land, yet more non Belgians for this made up shit tip
>continue brutalising Congolese for 20 years
>finally get shit kicked in by Germany
>divided between Netherlands and France, as should be
>allies liberate western Europe
>non-country restored for no reason
>founds the EU for "humanitarian reasons"
>>causes the most devastating conflict in human history
so you are blaming belgium for WWI? not gavrilo princip for assasinating franz ferdinand? not schliffen for saying that invadeing a neutral country won't enrage britain? not nikoali II for not letting the A-H punish serbia for murdering their archduke?
this is cheap b8
>>575788
If Belgium didn't exist, as it shouldn't have, Britain wouldn't have been involved and Germany would have beaten the French.
>>575788
Schlieffen didn't say shit about Britain not caring. People forget he was writing a hypothetical exercise.
Does anyone know of a good site to get pdf files of college textbooks?
Looking for Psychology in Action by Karen Huffman
It's about 100 bucks, which i can afford, but I would rather get it for free
>inb4 meatspin
>>575514
>Does anyone know of a good site to get pdf files of college textbooks?
Elsevier.
CUP.
OUP.
Psychology in Action by Karen Huffman
Wiley have it on their website.
>>575514
Libgen is the go-to.
>>575518
no, im not looking for a purchasable book, im looking for a pdf version of it for free
I'll start
>>575471
War of the Spanish Succession
2easy
>>575471
7 Yrs.
Correct
I dunno man. Its the one thing that made me unable to connect to Indians in books.If you wanted to disrespect a corpse I could understand how a dick would want to do that, cut off a few limbs or the head. But who was fucked up enough to bring up scalping? Its like some Indians straight off the Ice Bridge Connecting Russia and Canada kill some scouts of an enemy tribe and they wanna show their enemies they mean business. And one guy in the back brings up cutting off his scalp like scaling a fish. Seriously whats the significance of it?
And they did it while alive, too.
>>575407
They did it precisely to provoke your reaction.
Except when they were doing it, it was a real risk to white people and instilled fear as well as disgust. Whites were less likely to travel into Indian lands to settle if they feared being scalped.
>>575407
Scalping is much older than Indians and far from exclusive to them.
"...a reexamination of a 300,000 year old fossil skull found in the same region (Northern Ethiopia) shows evidence of having been scalped."
-Tim D. White, UC Berkley
That's just the readiest source I have on hand feel free to do your own research
I'm not positive but I think I remember reading somewhere reliable that the British and french actually payed their Indian allies to terrorize enemy colonists with scalping, and that was the main introduction of the practice to the Americas. Not sure on that though.
Why, and how, did Anarchists lose the Spanish Civil War? They had early successes, but lost a major series of battles after that, only to be finally crushed by Franco.
>>575357
Franco had allies with significant material. The Republicans' only ally was the USSR which was at too great a distance to respond with ease, had to provide this support covertly, and naturally had its own problems.
>if we seize the cattle itll look bad
Name one leader from that era who gave a damn about human life, let alone cattle.
>>575401
>material
materiel
Watching A&E's War and Peace and wanting to talk about Russia's role in the war of 1805. I know Nappy gets owned at the end but what was Russia's purpose for getting involved? What was the big battles? Where can i research more about this?
>>575332
Just hit wikipedia and look into sources.
Also, The Cambridge History on Russia, check the volume which covers the Napoleonic Wars.
>>575332
Russia was very insecure about its place within Europe (they were upto WW1, arguably still are). Getting involved brought prestige and recognition 'as a European country' that every Emperor since Peter The Great craved.
>>575332
Russia was the central counter-revolutionary power, it meant to crush the French republic and later the empire.
Where did the idea of three meals a day come from? Ancient Greece and Rome had two, as do most aboriginal groups apparently. The concept of "breakfast" seems to vary by culture, but whether or not the culture at anything in the morning doesn't seem to have had an impact on the total number of meals per day.
Rome had three traditional meals a day for the most part.
>>575092
>Ancient Greece and Rome had two, as do most aboriginal groups apparently.
source?
>>575122
Romans did not eat breakfast.
What are some examples of American treating Native Americans like shit?
We only treated the males like shit.
All history pre 1950 consisted of everybody treating everbody like shit
native americans (indians) simply got cucked by big european cock. this basically explains the entire settling of north america.
>Short then is the time which every man lives, and small the nook of the earth where he lives; and short too the longest posthumous fame, and even this only continued by a succession of poor human beings, who will very soon die, and who know not even themselves, much less him who died long ago.
Was he being callous?
The essence of pessimism isn't bitterness; it's detachment. The Stoics were all about detachment.That's all.
>>574891
>Was he being callous?
no, just stoic :^)
>>574891
No, just gloomy. And he's still mostly right.
who best conquer ever
>hint its not this guy
Alexander is my favorite
>>574810
I don't even know why people say Khan.
He never really did anything...
Conquered a lot of grass with a lot of horsemen.
Never really overtook any of the major areas, just look at the thrashing the Mamluks gave to the "Golden Horde".
It's like saying that you've traveled the entire world thus you are the greatest traveler when in reality you took an airplane from New York to Beijing.
>>575095
>Conquered most of China
>Utterly annihilated the Khwarezmian Empire within 2 years
>As well as conquering lots of grass previously owned by other horsemen
>Never really did anything
Are you dense or just baiting?
>>574661
How do I become religious?
Hey Orthodox, what makes a council an Ecumenical Council?
>>574700
all the bishops/representatives of the bishops are there, must be called by the Bishop of Rome. since the Bishop of Rome isn't Orthodox, no ecumenical councils can happen.
>first major advance came against a depleted British force that was down to 2 infantry brigades
>still can't take tobruk
>second major advance came when the RN left the med to respond to the Japanese threat
>all this time could read British plans thanks to the dumb American diplomat
>lose and keep losing when no longer possessing huge material or intelligence edge
>>574577
>mobile armored division
>no gas
What were these absolute madmen thinking?
>>574577
Sonnenblume (sp?) was against 1 division and 3 independent brigades, so like 2 divisions altogether.
Although I do agree with you that Rommel is an incredibly overrated meme general; and his only real competition in that regard would probably be Patton for WW2 commanders.
>>574615
He did have gas. He had quite a lot of it, in fact. But Libya had no railroads back then, and he moved far away from his ports that were receiving fuel to sustain his advances on Egypt.
Something like 50% of his petrol supplies were spent moving other supplies up to the front.
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a348413.pdf
This is no trolling nor a Bait.
I really don't understand how muslims defend or understand Muhammads wars. I know sometimes they where only defending themselves. But it is clear that muslims invaded as well in the name of Allah. As well we clearly see a provocation from muhammad to the rest of nations. Inviting to convert to islam in a more "pressure way".
I really respected moderate muslims. But after reading Muhammed war cult, destroying pagans, it rather seems to me strange.
It even makes me believe that it wasn't difficult for the islamic state to justify themselves, thery are basically behaving similar as did muhammed in the beginning. Am I wrong?
>>574568
bump
i need to know
>>574568
>moderate
>muslims
If they were moderate they wouldn't be muslims.
>>574568
Abraham and Moses were also warlords. What's your point? YHWH is a god of war, and in the OT pretty violent.
Jesus is the odd one out because he's a false prophet. Also Christians still destroyed pagans, even if Jesus was a hippie.
>Build an empire
>Make it last
It seems to me only the romans, turks, persians, and chinese have been able to do this
>>574518
And Ethiopians.
Not to mention China is the only one of those that has lasted.
>>574518
this map brings me back to another time
>>574522
Don't know if you could the Ethiopians an empire.
Also, I didn't mean last until the present, but just generally last for a longer period of time.
help me with my homework /his/
what do?
>>574473
>using social media while in theatre
did you not have your OPSEC powerpoint m8?
>>574473
Les Américains sont très bonnes
# Black lives matter
>>574473
#DeadFriends
#StrangeLunch
#Yum!