Who should be held responsible for killing Jesus?
(please no overtly anti-semitic memery)
How about himself?
French Canadians.
>>805345
Well he didn't exist so no-one.
Obviously Jesus was a scumbag but did he deserve this?
Isn't this exactly what he wanted?
>>805264
Only in Christian meme theology, obviously the real Jesus didn't want to be crucified.
>>805321
>19 Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days.”
>20 They replied, “It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and you are going to raise it in three days?” 21 But the temple he had spoken of was his body. 22 After he was raised from the dead, his disciples recalled what he had said. Then they believed the scripture and the words that Jesus had spoken.
Seems a legit explanation, honest! It turned out Jesus wasn't talking about the actual temple he was talking about his body, he wanted to be killed!!!
Thoughs on the dashing fellow on the right?
>>805164
He did literally nothing wrong, unlike the guy on the left.
Permanent cause of butthurt to commies. The success of Finland, a former part of the Russian Empire, undermines the whole narrative about the Bolsheviks "lifting" Russia from a Dark Ages it wouldn't have left otherwise.
>>805227
Hey naziboo, did you know that nazis lost ww2!
What's wrong with Slav's Nationalism ? Why they prefer being tiny irrelevant shit holes instead of a strong unitary entity ?
made up countries for made up nations by made up histories
Following that logic the whole world should unite in a meganation
>>804995
Only the genocide against alboshits and mudslims can unite us.
Historically speaking, why was corruption and moral decay such a difficult issue to combat?
What do you mean by moral decay?
because corruption spreads and its upto blind luck if your prefered candidate could do the job
the more you have those, the bigger chance nothing gets done, eventually reaching a point when the state becomes disfunctional
moral decay im not entirely sure about, i mean raping and pillaging is morally wrong, but it fuelled empires for a long time
>>804981
Have you ever read about the last days of the Roman empire?
So /his/, how accurate and reliable is the story Our Lady of Fatima?
For those who don't know the story:
>3 kids in 1917 see the apparition of the Virgin Mary
>Told to pray there for some months
>Eventually the apparition causes the sun to dance in front of 30,000-100,000 people
At a guess, extremely unreliable.
>a miracle happened to ME, I'm so special
Trash
>>804920
>Fatima
It's a muzzie name so it's probably wrong
>>804921
But anon, they got pics
About Medieval period games:
Were weapons-based meme divisions a real thing? I mean beyond archers/infantry/cavalry. I mean in medieval II total war has divisions like "spearmen," who all have spears, and then "halberdiers" who all had halberds, then "swordsmen" like sword bearing infantry, and "macemen" or some shit.
Pikemen, archers, and crossbowmen were a thing I know, but what about the rest.
Lets limit this shit to 900's-1400's.
>>804894
Do you really need to ask this fucking question?
>>804894
Medieval 2 isn't very reflective of actual history the Normans in England don't even have access to Norman knights. Most of the one weapon only units comes from the problem of who wins in rock paper scissors and how to implement that using shit computers. Total War sacrifices historical accuracy for game play and balance that's why the HRE is such shit there is a limit to what they could do. I hope to see as computers improve bigger and better games I really want Agincourt with historical numbers and units
If we're talking about non-noble soldiers then a lord would generally supply their own retinue's arms and armor and then march off to convene with the rest of the army by a certain time frame. This resulted in low standardization across the entire army as a whole but across the lord's retinue you may have something like, say, 20 archers, 30 spear men, 10 men at arms etc all equipped in a varied and good fashion; so a reasonably standardized mix of 'sub-units' among the lord's retinue.
These small sub units were usually cobbled together into larger regiments under the command of a captain. This resulted in these regiments having differences in training and tactics but reasonably similar arms and armor at least.
Knight's retinue's were different, however, as each knight or man-at-arms was generally accompanied by several non-knight warriors to support him. Knights were generally armed as best they could afford and varied considerably based on their wealth.
TLDR: The medieval world was a quartermaster's nightmare and standardization was shit tier.
Have Richard Dawkins invented or discovered atheism?
He interacted with several religions and supernatural beliefs, and rejected them all, because of both general and particular criticisms.
>>804678
That's not answering my question m8
>>804654
ofcourse no you fucking idiot do you really think that not believing in a god is this new?
>be English
>get blown the fuck out by 16(sixteen!) year old girl
You just can't make this shit up
>>804415
>Boys
That should be changed to Chads ;^)
She never actually planned any campaigns or even fought a single English soldier in combat. All she did was wave a banner. Basically a glorified cheer leader.
>>804428
And the eternal Anglo strikes again
Let's discuss the circumstances leading up to a German victory over the Soviet Union.
hitler manages to take moscow
all over then
>>804387
I am tired of hearing people say this.
That is exactly what Germany TRIED to do.
They couldn't extend deep into Russia because it was a logistical nightmare. They couldn't get enough fuel and ammunition and personal supplies to continue the blitzkrieg. They would have to attack, wait for resupply, attack, wait for resupply, etc. The majority of Russian land is wilderness hardly worth capturing, and the Soviets destroyed everything worth taking as they retreated. The Russian rails were too wide for German trains and had to be rebuilt, and as they were marching to Moscow, they noticed that they had a huge weak point in their line that needed to be covered.
>>804387
This. The soviets would have collapsed if Moscow fell
Was Alfred really that great of a king? Did he deserve his title?
He defeated the Vikings and started the unification of England, not too shabby.
Alfred’s lack of a saintly epithet, a disadvantage in the Middle Ages, was the salvation of his reputation in a post-Reformation world. As a pious king with an interest in promoting the use of English, Alfred was an ideal figurehead for the emerging English Protestant church. The works he had commissioned or translated were interpreted as evidence for the pure Anglo-Saxon church, before it had become tainted by the false Romanism introduced by the Normans.
>>804301
He saved the Anglos from being raped by Danes
Dumbest wars thread
>>804270
bump
>>804270
posting the best one
>>804329
daily reminder that Venice is a dishonourable nation marred by perfidy
but for real how does this even happen
Religion is to Philosophy what Politics is to what?
policy
Power
Ethics.
Does a disgruntled breakup of a former alliance generally lead to war based on historical evidence?
What if those results were extrapolated and applied to the breakup of the Eurozone if it were to happen?
>>804188
How the fuck has this got anything to do with aliens
How old is the concept of what we today call "race"?
Was race an important issue to ancient civilizations like Egypt or Rome? If it was not important, when did it become so important? Has it been a gradual build or has the idea gone in and out of use?
No pol shit please.
We had this same thread yesterday
>>804121
I didn't come on here yesterday.