[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3933. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: elephant armour.jpg (82KB, 708x563px) Image search: [Google]
elephant armour.jpg
82KB, 708x563px
My friend and I are having an agument, he says that the best way to deal with elephants wearing this sort of armour in ancient warfare would be to tell all your archers to specifically aim at the unprotected eyes. I said that that is unrealistic and you can't tell a company of archers to specifically aim for the eyes, considering they'd be in formation and volley fire and whatnot.
Can you guys weigh in on this at all? For discussion's sake, how would you deal with elephants wearing this armour?
53 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>792967
Your friend is right.

One way that Timur seems to have done was light animals on fire and send them running into the elephants.

If they are fairly close, artillery could also be an option.
>>
The best way to deal with armored elephants is to coat some livestock in burning pitch and let them loose into the enemy ranks. The elephants will be spooked and they will break.
>>
>>792967


I'm pretty sure the traditional method of dealing with armored elephants was to use fire if you were trying to take them out or frigthen them off.

Well-disciplined armies could actually just maneuver around them. Elephants aren't particularly aggressive animals, and at battles like Zama, the Romans opened up gaps in their line, and the elephants charged to there, not eager to fight a bunch of strangers. They're not easy to turn around once they start running, so once they're through your lines, you stand a decent chance of winning the battle before they can be turned around and sent back at you again.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (84KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
84KB, 1280x720px
so i've been reading up on this period of time while bored at work a lot recently. it was always something i kind of knew existed but never paid much attention to, and it's really fascinating. but who exactly were the sea people. were they greeks? combination of ethnicities? were the philistines greek? what about the israelites - some kind of combination of hyksos remnants/habiru/shasu/canaanites?

and the mitanni seemed pretty baller
21 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>792964
We don't know much about them. They seem to have been a various group of raiders, consisted with Sumerians, Philistines, Mycenaeans, Sardinian and other Greek-like populations
>hyksos remnants/habiru/shasu/canaanites?
Hyksos existed only around a thousand years before the raiders showed up, and the sea peoples attacked Canaanites. So, no.
>>
>>792964

>were the philistines greek?

Just going by the Bible, (and I realize the flaws in this methodology) they were probably an Indo-European group of some sort. The few Philistine words that the Bible records are a mix of IE stuff (Goliath) and Semetic stuff (Dagon), and given that by this time they were living right smack dab in the middle of a bunch of semites, it makes more sense for them to originally be of Indo-European stock who picked up a bit of the local languages rather than Semites who would have gotten Indo-European words from somewhere.

That's about all I know offhand though.
>>
>>793006
i thought some of the sea peoples may have been semites though, like the weshesh = tribe of asher? or is that just a bunch of gobbledygook made up by looking at words and saying "that looks right"

File: Uncle Joe.jpg (19KB, 235x311px) Image search: [Google]
Uncle Joe.jpg
19KB, 235x311px
>betrays proletarian internationalism
>"muh socialism in one country"
>makes deals with Fascists
>persecutes ethnic minorities
>criminalizes homosexuality
>betrays workers' movements around the world in favor of western capitalists
>dissolves ComIntern
>encourages nationalism

How did such a shit-tier communist command the loyalties of so many socialists around the world?
18 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
Post WWII indentarian politics. Bourgeois is obsessed with ideology and subscribing to one.
>>
>>792937
Because he seemed like the only viable option. Imagine you're a socialist during the Cold War; do you throw your support behind the largest state that claims to be advancing socialism or some exile who got icepicked in Mexico? It's the same opportunism that makes would-be socialists vote for the Democrats/Labour.
>>
Fuck off, Based Joe helped his country fight off the counterrevolutionary fascists who were attempting to dismember the socialist Soviet Union and exterminate the Slavs.

File: what is your name.jpg (39KB, 400x392px) Image search: [Google]
what is your name.jpg
39KB, 400x392px
What did he mean by this?
21 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
That's a shit-tier translation.
>>
It meant that it is itself having become itself; It is because it selfmade into what it essentially is.
>>
>>792782
How would you translate it?

File: Iran_Missile_Launch_Wide[1].jpg (26KB, 750x502px) Image search: [Google]
Iran_Missile_Launch_Wide[1].jpg
26KB, 750x502px
Are you the kind of person that would take up the mantel of doing something very bad for a good cause? For example, could you push the button? I mean if it really came down to it, and no one else was going to because they were afraid of killing millions of people, could you bring yourself to do it?

I feel like the normal thing is to not push the button, I feel like I would be the guy who pushes the button because someone has to and I don't want that to be on anyone else. What kind of person are you anon?
18 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>792724
>I take everything I know about nuclear warfare from movies and videogames
>>
>>792728
It's only an example anon. I can come up with another one if this one bothers you so much.
>>
File: DreddApocalypse.jpg (167KB, 570x650px) Image search: [Google]
DreddApocalypse.jpg
167KB, 570x650px
Yes.
MAD isn't worth anything if one side decides to just roll over and die.

File: _9797885_orig.jpg (29KB, 499x333px) Image search: [Google]
_9797885_orig.jpg
29KB, 499x333px
What was Western Rome like in the last hundred years or so before it fell?
26 posts and 8 images submitted.
>>
had a lot of germanic refugees
>>
>>792008
Like Yurop today
>>
File: rome_400ad.png (2MB, 1392x908px) Image search: [Google]
rome_400ad.png
2MB, 1392x908px
>>792008
Harsh taxes on the poor, widening gap between rich and poor, settled foreigners in your local town, Christianity going from just being that of the urban poor to even people out in the countryside, walls being built around all the towns again, soldiers being stationed on the walls with heavy artillery, peasants being tied to the land in a form of proto-serfdom.

File: 1404252380394.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
1404252380394.webm
3MB, 1280x720px
How do you justify being a materialist?

>The doctrine that the world is made up of objects whose existence is independent of human consciousness turns out to be in conflict with quantum mechanics and with facts established by experiment.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2009/mar/17/templeton-quantum-entanglement


And don't tell me "Occam's Razor", because: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_brain
38 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>791980
>journalists in charge of understanding quantum mechanics

This is fucking babby tier. No, reality doesn't depend on human consciousness. Boltzmann brains have nothing to do with that.
>>
>>791980
>the guardian
why don't you post a reputable news organization?
>>
>>791986
>Bernard d'Espagnat
>journalist

File: Belgium.png (35KB, 400x327px) Image search: [Google]
Belgium.png
35KB, 400x327px
Ceci n'est pas un pays.
22 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>791948
Quelle partie? Wallonie ou tous Belgium?
>>
>>792686
L'entierete de la Belgique.

C'est un etat artificiel ayant a sa creation pour seul but d'empecher les Francais de tapper les Allemands et les Hollandais, et vice-versa.

C'est une relique d'un temps passe, il est grand temps qu'elle rejoigne la France.
>>
>>791948
t. butthurt dutchman

File: maxresdefault.jpg (263KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
263KB, 1920x1080px
I'd like to make an official thread about Plotinus so here's one.

Since many years i'm attracted by religion, mysticism, mystic philosophy like Vedanta, and stuff... I've been interesting in Orthodox Christianity, sufism, and else for a lot of time because muh mystic god.

Maybe one and a half year ago i've discovered Plotinos ( his greek name in biography ) and i litteraly fell in love with him, it took me a lot of time to read and understand him, but this man is litteraly diamond.

I think he was the smartest guy of late antiquity ( because this century was shitty, you know, with gnostics and all else ). He managed to gather the best of platonism, aristotelicism, stoicism in one monistic rational spiritual and poetic philsophy. And his thought is so optimistic ! No sin ! No hell ! No right and wrong ! Everything is already given to us, the One is already inside of us, all we need to do is to change our consciousness, to get the real right divine view that allows us to the intellect and, finally, the One himself.

For years I've been looking for spirituality in order to fullfill my empty life, but not with christianity, not with islam, hinduism, bouddhism or else.

Today and forever, i know that my wholre life belongs to the philosophy of Plotinos, this man gave me every answer i've been always looking for.

Please, read this man and don't forget what he said, he's worth it.

And sorry for language, english is not my native tong.
46 posts and 8 images submitted.
>>
been reading Enneads after some light exposure to his philosophy. reading his work with a solid background in mysticism/religion has been fucking awesome.

he's probably one of the smartest individuals I've ever, ever read, the guy is a treasure. he really was on to something. i don't think i have a single problem with any of his philosophy anywhere
>>
Nice blog. Subscribed.
>>
File: large-scale_structure.jpg (57KB, 540x440px) Image search: [Google]
large-scale_structure.jpg
57KB, 540x440px
What stuck out to me while reading his Enneads:

>the soul is only evil "when it thinks the body's thoughts"

>the soul understood almost as a shaft of light that falls on matter, as an impersonal, "natural" process, and less some vague force with aims and aspirations of its own (except for the Good)

>Happiness as being not a life of pleasure, but living life through and in "the faculty competent enough to announce pleasure's value [in the first place]", in other words, unconditional happiness stems from being grateful for even being alive in the first place, and being able to apprehend this life's transcendent Source

>on evil being more like Murphy's Law than the devil

>chronic pain in the virtuous man: "And so in all his pain he asks not pity: there is always the radiance in the inner soul of man, untroubled like the light in a lantern when fierce gusts beat about it in a wild turmoil of wind and tempest."

>Absolute evil being "utter dearth", the "ever-needy", compared to the Good, which is totally "self-sufficing, self-possessed"

>"There is no power that can wrest anything of its distinct nature."

File: 1447015542955.jpg (7KB, 250x242px) Image search: [Google]
1447015542955.jpg
7KB, 250x242px
>After WW2, America tries to spread freedom and democracy for the next 60 years
>fails
>tries again
>fails
>tries again
>fails
>tries again
>fails
>tries again
>fails
>tries again
>fails
>keeps doing the same thing now in Syria
>fail in progress

I really don't get this /his/. Why doesn't America learn from its past mistakes???
43 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
How are they failing? They've effectively established Pax Americana without the need of forcing their ideology of others. That's soft power projection at its finest. On top of their apex military, what's left to secure their seat at the top? They're doing everything advantageously.
>>
>>791435
It never tried to spread freedom and democracy, just its own hegemony
>>
>>791435
>America tries to spread freedom and democracy

You don't actually believe that do you?

File: 1449967199364.png (575KB, 673x522px) Image search: [Google]
1449967199364.png
575KB, 673x522px
The last millennium of the Roman Empire might as well have been a Christian caliphate run by Armenians (proto-Turks). Why is this Byzantium so glorified by Hellenists and Classicists here, when the actual Hellenes lost power.

Pic related: average Byzantine.
39 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
The Turks also called themselves "Romans," lol.
>>
really good thread
>>
>>791290
>Christian caliphate
The Caliphate was an Islamic copy of the Empire, so kind of?

File: Roman_Republic-44BC.png (17KB, 1020x624px) Image search: [Google]
Roman_Republic-44BC.png
17KB, 1020x624px
Why do normies consider Rome to only be an empire starting from when Augustus was named Princeps? I don't understand this. What do you consider the definition of an "empire", /hist/ and would you agree that Rome started as an empire even if it was a republican society well before Augustus's reign?
26 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
The distinction between the Roman "Republic" and the Roman "Empire" is meant to differentiate between their forms of government. It's pretty significant, seeing as how in the Roman Republic, there was no permanent autocrat in charge of the government (hence Republic) and in the Roman Empire, an emperor stood as the head of the government (hence Empire). It really isn't hard to understand.
>>
>>791035
>If the emperor calls himself princeps he isn't an emperor
Anon he was called imperator anyway. The word just means "leader"
>>
Is there any chance the Roman empire would have done better if Julius Caesar had just cleared out the corruption from the Republic instead of declaring himself dictator?

File: images (1).jpg (15KB, 229x220px) Image search: [Google]
images (1).jpg
15KB, 229x220px
What are the best arguments against reductive materialism?
21 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>791013
It's just a perspective.
>>
Science has yet to prove the nature of reality and mind to be reducible to natural processes -- although it certainly seems to hint toward that. Even if it were true, moreover, the language of cognitive science is young and the brain is a very complex organ and it might be more useful and expedient to talk about minds using older more time-tested conceptual terminology from other schools of philosophy.
>>
Platonic forms.

File: yes.gif (201KB, 233x592px) Image search: [Google]
yes.gif
201KB, 233x592px
In WW2, considering all ammunitions, from those of handguns to the main cannons of battleships, a total of 42.6 billion shots were fired.
49 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
>>790762

British forces in North Africa faced a perennial struggle to keep sand out of vital equipment. After almost a year and a half of testing various solutions, they came to the conclusion in late 1941 that condoms worked best to keep machinery free of sand.
>>
Mozart was black
>>
>hitler started his own culture/church
>christians and jews btfo
>christians and jews use the new jer u.s.a. lem to kill hitlers church
>europe btfo
>better make all reports and facts surrounding the war as trivial, hazy, revisionist as possible.
>goyim_can_never_know.jpg
>???
>profit

File: JimmyCarter.jpg (140KB, 800x983px) Image search: [Google]
JimmyCarter.jpg
140KB, 800x983px
What does /his/ think of Jimmy Carter?
40 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
Peanut farmer.
>>
Not the president we needed but the one we deserved. Fantastic human being.
>>
Good guy, smart guy, bad president.

Best move: DoE.

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [3923] [3924] [3925] [3926] [3927] [3928] [3929] [3930] [3931] [3932] [3933] [3934] [3935] [3936] [3937] [3938] [3939] [3940] [3941] [3942] [3943] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.