純金董,
下面的褲子,
我所有的暨將不逗辛勞,
龍大和不可戰勝的勃起,
只要我的洞接管我的身體。
我們的巨人悸動勃起破我們的褲子,
而我們暨是廣闊的,不可阻擋的。
越南盾綿延無限,
精液湍流洋溢。
>>1304438
> Gold Dong,
> The following pants,
> All I will not tease cum hard,
> Long Japanese invincible erection,
> As long as my hole over my body.
> Our giant throbbing erection break our pants,
> And we are cum vast, unstoppable.
> Vietnamese Dong stretches infinitely,
> Semen turbulent filled.
>>1304438
>Dong of solid gold,
>Underneath the pants,
>All of my cum will don't tease to toil,
>Long, big and undefeatable erection,
>As long as my dong takes over my body.
>Our giant throbbing erection is breaking our pants,
>And our cum is vast and unstoppable.
>The dong stretches infinitely,
>The semen brims with turbulence.
Baт ape юy тaлкинг aбoyт?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oEWA7UglB4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdI5y3iwhLU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlzZe2PP1h0
>>1304406
>Racism
So invented the gun, /his/?
Earliest exampme of a gun was found in southern europe. Was it Ottomans? Europeans? I know China invented the first firearm, which was like a packed tube thing with projectiles in it but who invented the first gun?
Gunpowder came first, and was probably made somewhere in China.
>>1304339
Thats not what I asked.
>>1304339
wasn't there also some european monk who wrote down the recipe for gunpowder around the same time?
I know this thread is doomed from the start, but what the hell.
Can we talk about West African history? Anything from prehistory up to the 1800s.
I put together a summary of the region's history that I find useful, but it's pretty incomplete (like I don't know where the Hausa would fit into this);
>c. 5000-2500 BC: Pastoral nomads in the Sahara
>c. 2500-500 BC: Crop-based farming emerges in the Sahel and spreads south into the forest regions
>c. 500 BC - 700 AD: Ironworking spreads across the region, increasingly complex cultures like the Nok and Djenne-Djenno emerge
>c. 700 AD - 1450 AD: Trans-Saharan trade opens up and stimulates economic and social development, true 'civilization' emerges and flourishes in places like Ghana, Mali, and Yorubaland, Islam is introduced
>c. 1450-1650 AD: Europeans contact coastal regions, open up coastal trade, Benin flourishes, Songhai and the Morocco dominate the Sahel
>c. 1650-1880 AD: Economy and society increasingly dominated by slave trade, population declines, economic and social development stagnates, culture regresses, Jihadists dominate Islamic regions, Dahomey, Oyo, and Ashantis dominate coastal regions
>c. 1880-1960: Colonial rule
Some stuff worth discussing;
>Did ironworking develop independently or was it introduced from Carthage or Meroe?
>Did the black death effect the region, and to what extent?
>Why was there no use of wheels?
>What effect did the slave trade have on the region, was it only limited to coastal regions?
Because west African history is filled with losers and losers are BORING
>>1304335
So every non-European people ever?
>>1304331
Was there any trans-Saharan travel prior to the existence of camels and the trade routes? I'd like to imagine that the Garamantians and people like that didn't just have their backs against the wall pre-1200.
Do you believe there is a distinction between appearances and things-in-themselves, i.e.. objects as they appear to us and objects as they are in and of themselves?
>>1304189
things in themselves are shapeless and infinite, they are pure information or in another word energy, so they're obviously not as we perceive them, for that matter we experience things differently to varying degrees just by having individual subjectivity for example two people can experience the same song very differently.
>>1304189
Nah, that's a metaphysical idea, which Kant says is impossible to have
"Things in themselves" are things as they are in the mind of God. The answer is yes and no.
Why was the Soviet Union more willing to use women as combatants? Sure there weren't many but every time I here about female soldiers in WWII they're always Russian.
Because Soviet Union was a true feminist state? Even in modern Russia women are much better than men.
>>1303716
Because feminism is integral to communism.
I don't know, but I would guess it has to do with communist ideology valuing women more in general.
Gonna dump a few more pics.
Different angle
I'm not the only one that loves this type of architecture, right?
>>1303249
Lets discuss in this thread what could have gone differently. I picked Willy as thread picture because i think the most intresting question would be a central powers victory. The german Reich was a serious superpower back then and a german victory would have had many intresting implications.
-How would colonialism play out in this timeline?
- What would happen with the countries that formed the soviet Union in OTL?
-In the light of german scientific superiority: What would have changed in technology? Would technological progress have been the same, slower or faster?
- what conflicts would have defined this worlds 20th century?
I am also open to discuss all other scenarios you please. Just refrain from /pol/Posting and anti-german shitposting turning this thread to shit.
> german victory
What kind of German Victory? Did they defeated the France asap and then forced Russia out of a war? Did Italy fight for Germany in this scenario?
>>1303066
I am open to all scenarios, i think a scenario where germany concentrates on russia first while taking a defensive stance against france and then manages to not pull the US in the war is the most realistic. Russia could have collapsed sooner against stronger forces freeing most of the troops for the western front. This would have allowed germany to feed itself with the agriculture of the Ukraine preventing the starvation of OTL.
Well if we take ww1 as it happened and just slap a German victory on it, by saying the Germans reached Paris somehow before the Americans landed in Europe and that the War simply ends there (which is unlikely).
Then there are a few things safe to say.
For one : The Blame of ww1 wouldn't been put on Germany but rather France.
Russia might also be a possibility, but France is just the most likely in all regards.
Another thing is : Germany would be a lot bigger, and I mean a lot, since our friend Willy over here really wanted France's colonies, like, all of them, and had he won, odds are he would have actually pushed for that claim and left France alone afterward.
Now without their colonies, France might suffer from an economic crisis, similar to, but not on the scale of, IRL Germany post ww1.
Regarding the USSR countries - surprisingly, Germany and Russia would most likely hold good relations still, as it was the Empire that enabled communism and funded the revolution.
Stalin might be a problem to friendly relations though.
Chances are also that Communism in general would find a lot more support in Europe, since Fascism would be largely considered pointless with Imperialism still fully functioning, and a lot of people who support democracy would most likely also support some kind of Communism or Socialism , due to the common political enemy of any monarch ever.
As for conflicts, I have genuinely no idea.
Maybe France trying to start ww2 in some capacity with their own version of Hitler.
Who knows?
Post monarchs and leaders that got btfo
>>1301910
antiochus
Define "Love", /his/.
>>1301596
According to what culture.
>>1301611
To yours.
>>1301627
What is love?
Baby dont hurt me..
Can somebody explain to me the success of the Phoenician script?
>Adopted by Greeks and therefore the west (and therefor becoming the "default" script)
>Adopted by Arabs and Jews
>Adopted by Persians even before having the Arabic script forced upon them
Only Chinese Hanzi and Indian Devanagari (and argurably, Cuneiform before the Bronze Age collapse) have had such an influence on their neighbors, and those two were powerhouses throughout history.
What made the Phoenician script origin of the scripts most of the world uses to write nowadays?
>>1300868
Is there a version of that map with a legend?
>>1300868
It was phonetic
Dear /his/, a Mexican friend unironically asked me to tell him at least 2 wars France had won over Germany. Under the pressure, I of course surrendered. But now I'm out of wine and with a little help from my friends, I'd like to answer him. Where do I start ?
Both World Wars.
>>1299837
>forgetting about the Fourth Coalition
Come the FUCK on
>>1299841
Well meme'd
Was the enlightenment a mistake?
>>1305011
Yes.
I don't think SJWs would exist if the enlightenment never happened.
>>1305013
lel, what a narrow conception of history
it allowed Europe to conquer the world
how could it be a mistake
Although colonial history is not necessarily something to be proud of,it still astonishes me what one small continent was able to accomplish. How is it even possible to dominate the world in this extent?
Korea was under Russian influence
Japan was occupied by British forces
>>1295050
>one continent
You mean french, dutch, british, iberians and russians. The contribution of the rest is laughable or doesn't even exist.
>>1295050
>Small
Compared to who?
Why was the Jewish people expelled so many times?
Pure coincidence, goy
Christianity
Jews, having been banned from agriculture (95% of the world's economy) they were forced into "unsavory" professions such as banking (usury was forbidden by the Catholic church), and organized crime. Whenever Christians needed a scapegoat for issues the commoners did not understand, blaming the evil christkillers was always the easy thing to do the same way Donald Trump tells rednecks that all the problems with the U.S is due to nonwhites and nonchristians
>>1306481
Who the fuck made this map. Poland is way too far in the east. The Netherlands has now become the north of Germany. Hungary is atop of Croatia and Bosnia