LoTrayBud
The Five New Commandments 2016-06-19 07:11:52 Post No.1306288
[Report] Image search: [Google]
The Five New Commandments 2016-06-19 07:11:52 Post No.1306288
[Report] Image search: [Google]
1. No pedophilia-hebephilia 2. No raping-molesting 3. No gore-violence 4. No cheating-lying 5. ?
8 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1464636629638.png (67KB, 616x596px) Image search:
[Google]
67KB, 616x596px
>>1306288
1.no shitposting. 2 no unoriginal comments. 3.no posting unrelated pictures. 4.no unnessecery memeposting 5.no mean posting
pic unrelated, also fuck you op
>>
>>1306288
1. Wherever you go, you must rape.
2. Wherever you go, you must rob.
3. Wherever you go, you must kill.
4. Love your mother anally.
5. Don't put your dick into animals.
>>
>>1306428
Nice rules for 4chan! Btw the post under you is a hypocrite ;)
File: dixon1.jpg (236KB, 504x368px) Image search:
[Google]
236KB, 504x368px
Is it fascism?
16 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1306253
Not really
>>
Hereditary socialism
>>
No.
Anonymous
There might actually be a god 2016-06-19 06:26:50 Post No.1306205
[Report] Image search: [Google]
There might actually be a god 2016-06-19 06:26:50 Post No.1306205
[Report] Image search: [Google]
There might actually be a god
Anonymous
2016-06-19 06:26:50
Post No. 1306205
[Report]
[View this topic]
And he loves messing with my feelings with meaningless coincidences. I can't ignore the fact that there has been so many coincidences.
13 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1306205
"The truly extraordinary day is one where nothing out of the ordinary happens."
- some guy I'm paraphrasing
Anyway, no God.
>>
>>1306216
i deeply feel like as if there is someone controlling my life. its like "lets make anon cry today. lets make anon get in trouble." I swear to god, my soul is resonating sometimes in sync with the universe and I legit get premonitions now about the future. It's like I almost fully recognize the pattern. I usually get these premonitions asking myself "what does god want for me right now?" And I have been eerily predicting things now. I wonder how far I can go until I'm nothing but a jaded soul.
>>
>>1306224
God isn't messing with you. He Loves you.
Can an omniscient God and free will coexist? If God both knows and created everything, then did He created us knowing that we will deny Him and burn in hell?
29 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1306144
Nice dubs.
I think both existing is paradoxical, especially if you also invoke that God is supposed to be "all good."
But christfags are just going to >muh god and say we can't understand it so it's pointless to argue.
>>
In Zoroastrianism there is an opposing evil force the opposite of God does that answer anything?
>>
>>1306314
That would resolve the problem but Christianity is not dualistic. Personally, I think it is important to limit God's attributes. Jung for example thought of God as not being unchanging and all-good. Instead he thought God was undergoing individuation through history just as we are.
File: Nietzsche187a.jpg (632KB, 1464x1986px) Image search:
[Google]
632KB, 1464x1986px
Was Nietzsche the 'Ayn Rand' of the 1800s? His ideas (master/slave morality, will to power, etc.) all seem to favor the strong (edgy) individual over the weak members of society.
9 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1306095
He wasn't considered a political thinker in his lifetime really.
>>
>I have found strength where one does not look for it: in simple, mild, and pleasant people, without the least desire to rule—and, conversely, the desire to rule has often appeared to me a sign of inward weakness: they fear their own slave soul and shroud it in a royal cloak (in the end, they still become the slaves of their followers, their fame, etc.) The powerful natures dominate, it is a necessity, they need not lift one finger. Even if, during their lifetime, they bury themselves in a garden house!
(Friedrich Nietzsche. Nachlass, Fall 1880 6 [206])
>>
Obviously it favors the strong over the weak, as it can be read on the §2 of The Antichrist. But there is still the question of how we should interpret what Nietzsche means by weakness and strongness, if he is thinking merely of the body or instead of the will itself, which as the whole nature of something includes the body but doesn't limit itself to it. As he said in >>1307457, sometimes the external strongness can be a shield to inner weakness.
File: kennedy-robert.jpg (63KB, 380x440px) Image search:
[Google]
63KB, 380x440px
Would he have made a good president?
16 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
Better question, would he?
>>
>>1306065
Probably
File: JESUS-IN-RED-ROBE.jpg (37KB, 424x600px) Image search:
[Google]
37KB, 424x600px
An agnostic is an atheist, because knowledge is equal to belief. Humans cannot be fully objective by definition: they know gravity, they believe in gravity. They know stars, they believe in stars. They know logic, they believe in logic. They don't know real dragons, they don't believe in real dragons. To know is simply to strongly believe.
Differentiating between equal verbs is even the Proof that humans know what they believe and believe what they know, because even if another human source verifies that belief, it will be a human verification, therefore subject to belief and subjective observation as well: "-He knows you are lying" implies that I believe you are lying as much as he believes you are lying, it is a strong belief due to collective validation.
It is as much a belief because many wrong affirmations are collectively validated, and many are even validated by majorities. Collective knowledge happens just by a collective experience: if by chance we have same dreams, we are now holders of collective knowledge. If we watch the same movies, no matter how horrible and fake they are, this is our collective knowledge because it is empirical. If we experience similar delusions, it is just as much collective knowledge as anything a human can grasp.
Perfect knowledge therefore, can only be possessed by God, all humans have are beliefs and stronger beliefs, which are beliefs nevertheless. In a binary question as belief in God, you can only believe or not believe, and that is it.
24 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: main5.png (15KB, 624x562px)
15KB, 624x562px
>>
There may be some genuine fence-sitters who we could call "agnostics", but what is really dumb is to define agnostic as somebody who admits that he doesn't know for sure. By that definition agnostic could be either someone
1) who believes in God and acts accordingly
2) who doesn't believe and lives his life as if God didn't exist
as long as both accept the possibility that they are wrong. Categorizing 1) as a theist and 2) as an atheist is more practical.
>>
>>1306351
Possibilites aside
Thats not what actually happens
Agnostics are 99% of the time the 2 variety.
Anonymous
Traditionalist School and Mysticism 2016-06-19 01:58:18 Post No.1305428
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Traditionalist School and Mysticism 2016-06-19 01:58:18 Post No.1305428
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 12039658_679911545443257_4047257182043866232_n.jpg (22KB, 640x616px) Image search:
[Google]
22KB, 640x616px
Traditionalist School and Mysticism
Anonymous
2016-06-19 01:58:18
Post No. 1305428
[Report]
[View this topic]
Coming from a materialistic background, I have grown interested in the mystical layers of religion, such as Orthodox monasticism and Islamic sufism and the thoughts of the likes of Evola and Guenon in particular.
Not having a deep understanding of philosophy, I'd like to get an explanation in layman terms on what exactly are the implications of the view that several religious traditions and initiatory paths deriving and being valid in the light of a primal Tradition from a metaphysical(not historical!) perspective.
What attracts me to mysticism is that I can compensate with my heart where my mind does not allow, but if one adopts the perennialist view, to me it seems that it is has no depth. How can you partake in the Holy Christian Mysteries while at the same time viewing just as valid other mystical paths?
In my (lack of) understanding, it seems at best to be nothing more than glorified aestheticism and at worst LARPism.
8 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1305428
I have a suspicion about mysticism. That it only works when it does not violate the laws of physics. Which means mostly never.
>>
>>1305428
>nothing more than glorified aestheticism and at worst LARPism.
/thread
>>
File: King Arthur.jpg (3MB, 1067x1873px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 1067x1873px
Is he ever coming back /his/?
17 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
Only when Britain is in most desperate need.
So if you're British, be cheerful. As bad as things are, they can definitely get worse, but on the plus side when they reach maximum shittiness you'll have Arthur back.
>>
>>1305962
I can imagine it now. King Arthur pouring out of the glowing gate of heaven, his warhost at his flanks, skewering the saracen mayor of London on his lance. He steps down from his steed and passes the faire blade to Sir Farage. Britain shall be cleansed.
>>
>>1305971
As far as Arthur is concerned, the only thing that is happening is that the family of Palomedes is giving the Saxons a taste of their own medicine.
File: 1464043514681.png (445KB, 1000x1640px) Image search:
[Google]
445KB, 1000x1640px
wew
10 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1305120
I agree.
>>
>>1305120
Cute.
>>
Not wew if true
File: 2016-06-19-01-10-36-1576318430.png (4KB, 275x183px) Image search:
[Google]
4KB, 275x183px
What went wrong?
36 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
They lost World War I.
>>
thread theme song? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3p39ulIfnzc
>>
Did anything ever go right?
File: e0034511_16533585.jpg (141KB, 600x295px) Image search:
[Google]
141KB, 600x295px
Was the Taishō period the most underrated period in Japan?
10 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1304799
Yes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcZFgzhf6wM
>>
>>1304799
https://youtu.be/nt3ZTD5yZWc
>>
was that the period that Japan succeeded in putting the meat into Korea?
if yes then yes
File: demolitionofchristsaviourcathedral.jpg (93KB, 800x610px) Image search:
[Google]
93KB, 800x610px
I am of the conviction religion should be discouraged and openly rebuffed. Not persecuted, due to the tendency of this to create martyrs and add fire to the fervor of already deluded believers, but simply scorned and treated as a dangerous and archaic - if somewhat amusing - remnant of pre-modern thought. In the same way that defunct ideas/notions such as alchemy or the Galenic corpus or the Miasma theory of disease are no longer considered in any decision-making on part of individuals or groups or taken seriously by people, religion should not be exempt. And yet, people continue to make exemptions and allowances for religious belief, treating it as though it were 'real' or valid despite providing no real contributions or evidence for its own existence, and in spite of its well-documented history of abuses and scandals and record of fundamentalism that directly goes against modern secular attempts to increase quality of life (and all simply for the sake of a supposed celestial dictator who has never been seen).
No persecution, but certainly, the end of tax exemptions to all religious organizations in developed nations. That's a good first step. Followed by the end of political "alliances" with religious groups (for example, LGBT groups aligning with supposedly 'tolerant' Christian ministries, etc.).
And this should be on an official level.
33 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1304628
There are many spelling mistakes in what you wrote. You seem like an illiterate moron.
>>
File: 1364838894007.jpg (201KB, 960x720px) Image search:
[Google]
201KB, 960x720px
>>1304628
>this post
>>
File: 1463690275355.jpg (58KB, 490x750px) Image search:
[Google]
58KB, 490x750px
>>1304628
>I am of the conviction religion should be discouraged and openly rebuffed
It already happens. Why do you think most people are irreligious?
File: 1461783971215.jpg (240KB, 960x960px) Image search:
[Google]
240KB, 960x960px
whats the point of philosophy?
13 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Philosophy means love of wisdom. It's just for fun, bro.
>>
Do you have a question?
How will you go about answering this question?
Enter philosophy
>>
>>1304563
It's to improve yer shit sarge!
Daily reminder amerindians
did not invent the wheel
did not invent bronze
did not domesticate animals
did not invent ships
did not study astronomy with their pyramids
If you repeat nonsense and lies like ornamental wheel imitations and obsidian cutting through steel you are an ethno-revisionist neo nazi racist
40 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
still the most rich country
>>
We did invent all that shit while you germanic niggers were slinging shit stop baiting
>>
>>1304549
Europeans didnt invent any of this either.
What was Europe doing when Egyptians were building pyramids? Oh, that's right, being niggers.