How this country manage to survive during the Italian Unification and WW2 ?
>>2008371
Bump
>>2008792
>>2008371
Some of the finest diplomacy. For example, when Napoleon invaded Italy, they provided support to the french. He then intended to reward them with a corridor to the sea, but the sammarinese diplomats graciously refused, arguing that this would be unmodest and, paraphrasing, that it could come around to bite their ass in time.
Sure enough they were right: when Napoleon was defeated, they suffered no reprimand for their actions, as they had refused the unrightful proposal.
This is merely an example, but when you think than they basically had to weave so skillfully over their entire (pluri-secular) existance just to survive, you really gotta take your hat off to that.
>>2008990
And how they convinced Mussolini to not invade them ?
What was the Germanic's end game?
>>2008325
>step 1 divide
>step 2 conquer
>>2008325
The destruction of Europe, of course. Same as always.
How do you go from this.....
>ITT: Villains of history
>>2008089
>>2008089
If you were Hitler in 1939, what would you have done differently?
Here's what I would do:
>invest in researching a long range strategic bomber
>drop the wasteful "superweapons" plan. Instead of spending resources of the V-2 rocket, or panther and tiger 2 tank, mass produce Panzer IVs and upgrade their armour.
>push for nuclear fission research, increase espionage in the americas to try to learn nuclear fission
>instead of wasting months and resources bombing britain for no reason, spend it instead on pushing for war against russia
>bring the campaign against russia forward to the beginning of 1941, or as soon as possible after the battle of france
>no north africa campaign, no alliance with italy
>secure romania as soon as possible after 1939 to protect it from russia
>ally with china instead of japan if possible,
>>2007979
>mass produce Panzer IVs
Who is going to crew them?
Might as well have 400 extra King Tigers with veteran crews
>no north africa campaign, no alliance with italy
Securing southern europe was essential to protect the rumainian oil feilds
>>2007979
>If you were Hitler in 1939, what would you have done differently?
Invent the atom bomb. Not sure why nobody else thought to do that.
>rig British election so Oswald Mosley wins
>Lead an offensive against USSR
>problem solved, ww2 known forever as a simple purge of world communism
The West only went to war with Germany both times in the 20th century in order to eliminate their biggest competitor.
Discuss.
Weve been through this before, it is englands historical duty and divine destiny to remove tyrants from europe
>>2007912
>English invented Concentration Camps for the South Africans but they will always be connected to Germany
Those sneaky Anglos.
The eternal anglo is almost as evil as the french.
In terms of how badly they treated their slaves. I know that barbarians and nomads took slaves but their children would be free, and they often granted freedom if the slaves behaved well.
Romans and greeks fucked, whipped and forced slaves into heavy labour.
The ottomans and other muslim states used slaves as soldiers and castrated them.
There are others I don't know of, so which nation treated slaves the worst? Also was slave breeding a thing and did it ever make up a country's economy?
Southern united states
>>2007862
Castrating your slaves would be a huge waste of lives, I highly doubt that the common slave got castrated in bigger quantities.
Eunuchs usually had either important tasks like watching over a harem (in islamic nations) besides other political duties, or they got used as musicians when their voices were good for singing.
Source would be appreciated if I'm wrong
Historical slave maltreatment is a meme. It's in your best interest to take care of your own property.
>russian """scientific achievements"""
>American ""space flight""
>>2007836
>Ukrainian "efficiency"
>American "architecture"
>Medieval history prof says English Longbows can shoot through plate armor
Why are Historians so clueless about weaponry? Do they just deal with documents all day and never figure out any of the technical stuff?
>>2007713
4/10
>>2007713
Technicalities of weapons aren't particularly interesting to a field that studies, at their core, human interactions, just like how lawyers don't particularly care about what a certain type of lockpick can pick just because they may be defending a thief.
If you cared about weapon technicalities, study engineering or archeology instead.
>>2007741
This is something that irritates me so fucking much.
I have a pretty autistic interest in history, and many history guys just care about the politics and big battles
I could not give a single fuck about king whothefuckcares declaring war on the guys over the hill, but I'll trade a kidney for information on how they made weapons and armour, what crops they grew, how they built their boats and how they designed roads and canals.
What is with communist countries and not being able to feed people?
That should be the basic fucking benchmark of a system of government. Literally every single system of government from 2000BC to feudalism to capitalism had agriculture figured out.
north korea cant fucking make enough food and almost collapsed in the 90s from a famine and people started to eat each other
similar fucking shit in CUBA a fertile island
the holodomor...
I mean, how the fuck can you think communism is a good system of government from a HISTORICAL standpoint when they can't even figure agriculture out? What the literal fuck, how can anyone defend this shit.
Even feudalism had it figured out.
more depression
>JUST
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8LtQhIQ2AE
Also that soviet leader who came to the US and went to a random grocery store and thought it was fake because grocery stores sucked so much ass in the USSR comes to mind
Planned economy fucks up agriculture really hard.
Soviet Union early problems with food were caused by forced collectivisation, which was extremely unpopular in most fertile regions of the country (Ukraine, namely). They later tried to solve these problems by starting several ill thought out agricultural reforms (pic related) and while later periods of Soviet Union saw no famines access to "luxury" foods was indeed scarce.
If a kolkhoz had a plan to produce X tones of grain or vegetables this year, but it was a really good year and they accidentally produced more, they'd just bury the excesses because they knew next year the plan would be raised to accomodate this increase and they had no guarantee that they could reproduce it.
Adding to the problem is the fact that population was steadily migrating to cities, world famous commieblocks were originally planned as temporary housing for all the new migrants from rural areas.
>>2007595
found the pic
So I've been wondering which would be better in the modern day, the modern middle eastern mess or the ottoman turks and if the ottoman turks had stayed in power how that may have affected the past and present. I don't have a position and want to hear yours.
>>2007568
Evidently the balkans would be much better off with Third Rome still in charge.
I would imagine the aristocracy of the Ottomans would be just like the House of Saud when ti comes to having no patience for ISIS and other Islamic fundamentalism.
It's a threat to their power so they would try to crush it completely.
>>2007839
>House of Saud
>having no patience for ISIS and other Islamic fundamentalism
Wut? The Saudi state itself funds and provides logistical support to Islamic State. This shit's not just a rumor or conspiracy theory anymore, Assange himself considered it the most important thing to come out of the Podesta leaks.
Why does Catholicism seem like such a depressing faith?
>live your whole life jumping through endless rituals (rosary, confession, mass, tithes, etc) to stay on Gods good side
>constantly looking over your shoulder for sind you might commit
>in the end you'll still probably go to purgatory for 200 years
Why would anyone choose to follow this? Not even a Prot btw
>>2007555
It's the best place to go for pedos and foot and cuckold fetishists.
They really talk too much about hell or even purgatory. Nor do they even stress the rituals as much any more besides mass. Practically no one does confession any more for example.
t. raised Catholic
>>2007555
Surely this is proof that Catholicism is one of the most real religions as it's not just allowing you to do whatever you want unlike say Islam.
Why are comfort women such a big issue in Asia ? From the number I have it says 50 000 women were concerned, among them there were also professional prostitutes.
I don't deny this system was basically slavery and pretty fucked up. But the japanese army did so many horrible things, why is it now one of the most controversial one ?
>>2007390
Failipino here.
Pretty much one of the war crimes they do not admit to doing. I mean: the guys who ran the sick prison camps were executed. People blamed with eliminating villages, stealing Asian treasures also went to the noose. So it was pretty hard to deny those. But CWs are denied.
>>2007396
I can understand this point. But it's also a relatively recent controversy. Why did it take so much time to adress this issue ?
>>2007440
>But it's also a relatively recent controversy. Why did it take so much time to adress this issue ?
Lolno, it's been so since the war ended.
What are some good books on Canadian history? Specifically the period 1870- to the 1990s. Thanks.
>>2007317
What history?
>>2007340
Was that supposed to be a joke? Because I'm not fucking laughing!
Rise and fall of the British Empire
Did they really build America?
Black people obviously. Didn't you listen in sociology class you stupid white Christian patriarchal homophobic transphobic hetero- normative, xenophobic, phobicphobic, phobe.
>>2007027
#ImwithKangz
>>2007021
Yeah they did some sick earthbending.
Did Cowboys actually exist?
Or is this video correct in saying Cowboys are nothing more than a circus act?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsC31tHRlgA
They did, however Buffalo bills show exaggerated a lot of the elements people associated with the "Wild," West. Cowboys were poor dudes trying to make a buck herding Cows. The occupation has been mythologized by Hollywood for entertainment purposes.
They did, and were quite widespread for a time in the west, but it wasn't as glamorous as it was depicted.
The fact that the American government fought the Indians doesn't mean that American settlements would have to deal with periodic Native raids
>>2006740
Not to mention that many western tribes were nomadic, and didn't own any land. "not that it makes it justifiable to force them off of it.