Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 2321. page

>>2014888
Because Auschwitz actually was taken like Bergen-Belsen or Dachau. Treblinka and other camps for Operation Reinhard where razed by the Nazis. Also thousands survived Auschwitz and where able to tell the story, only a handful of people managed to survive the Reinhardt camps.

>>2014914


Then why not Majdanek? It was the first camp liberated, captured almost completely intact. Hell, it was near city instead of in the middle of nowhere like the others.

>>2014952
No idea, maybe because Auschwitz was the biggest camp, had industrial killing and many witnesses. Maybe it was some Anglo-Soviet thing.

>>2014791
Ancap

>>2014791
Christian; he was a Presbyterian minister.

>>2014800

Would you say he was politically/ethically closer to Trump than to Marx?

Nobody?

look at the homepages of musees or google their catalogs.

Do you have a specific time period of a specific culture you're interested in..? That might just possibly help us narrow it down from THE ENTIRE FUCKING HUMAN RECORD.

>>2014624
They wouldn't, because Germans would rewrite history to their likenings.

It would be nigger-tier we-wuzing.

>>2014624

Badly.

Germany has no real means of striking at England, let alone the U.S. Positing a German victory (already extremely difficult) probably means defeating the USSR in some manner, and then enduring Anglo-Allied attacks until such time that the Western powers decide they can't dislodge Nazi Europe and recognize most if not all of their conquests.

In such time, you'd face enormous bombing raids by the Anglo-Allies, since they had air power and little else to hit the Germans with, and come 1945, nuclear weapons.

Depending on when exactly they throw in the towel, you're probably looking at a German "Empire" ruling over the baking, irradiated cinder of Europe.

>>2014662
Not to mention that Nazi Germany was a North Korea tier government.Even without a devastating bombing campaign, Germany likely would be a pathetic shithole the world feels bad for withing a decade or two.

>>2014615
how much we talking?

>>2014643
whats your offer?

>>2014651
well if my laptop hadn't shit the bed I could have sent you a few that I've done whilst at university. All were 2:1s and nothing special though.

>>2014607
Yes, it is called the big book of war. A favorite amongst anons which don't bother with the details of history but only want cool war stories.

>>2014649
Who is the author of The Big Book of War?

>>2014649
Oh wtf. A futurama reference. Any serious answers?

>>2014523
Keep the ottermans intact.

>>2014523
Prevent the spawn!
There is no other way, in every group of people no matter if religion, ideologie etc. some are gonna take it more serious than others and a few even gonna go fanatic

>>2014523
Russian empire doesn't use muslim missionaries to bring in pagans into society.

Soviet Union doesn't go full autism on the religion ban.

Radical islam thought has its origin in soviet central asia.

>>2014514
Just look how smug he is.

File: sooperbaad.png (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>2014514
>SATANIC
>GERMAN
>LOOSE BAND OF MICROSTATES

File: 9fa4308a3e8f174345e0472cd552ee4019241957ab843367330adf01bdc530c2_1.jpg (73KB, 480x775px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 480x775px

destroying wehraboos with only three words

>>2014446
Russian's had their best chance from '70-80, in some scenarios possibly even winning a European war, anything before and after those dates is just too lopsided towards the Americans to possibly win

>>2014446

extremely variable

we could have pre 1949 with or without nukes

or post 1949 with or without nukes

Let's just give them a break post WW2 and then a conventional war erupts, per the Soviet assault

Soviets might be able to get an initial land superiority, but recall that they, having been some irrelevant peasant nation only a few decades ago, would not be able to hold for long, outproduced by USA+UK. Recall that with the fall of the USSR, Western Lend Lease was revealed to have played a critical role in helping the Soviets win in the east. While the Soviets do have some nice low altitude aircraft (like Yak-3), western high altitude stuff like the B-17/24/29 and the P-51 would pound the shit out of Soviet infrastructure, logistics, and other useful things with no opposition. At least Germans had some aircraft with high altitude performance. Not to mention the USSR lacked a capable navy, with no carriers and even pre-WWI shit. It would be a difficult war, but the West would ultimately prevail.

>Communism BTFO several decades early
>Maoist China severely weakened or nonexistant
>North Korea weakened or severely nonexistant
>Vietnamese commies severely weakened or nonexistant
>Germans redeem themselves getting recruited by the western allies to fight against the Bolsheviks once more

Seriously, why didn't they do this? The US was the only nuclear-armed state at the time, there's pretty much no way they could have lost, and it would have prevented the decades of commie bullshit they had to deal with after the war

File: 1467107924436.jpg (111KB, 542x547px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 542x547px

>THE "EMPIRE"

>>2014440
Early:
France, Spain, England/UK, Poland-Lithuania, Austria with HRE, Ottomans.
Later:
France, Spain, UK, Prussia, Austria, Russia.

Infographics, timelines art and images in general would be highly appreciated too.

>>2014405
>literature

Blatant nonsense, where are you surmising that from

>>2014405
joyce, da vinci, michel angelo, the pope

File: 1477626984617.png (66KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 200x200px

>>2014405
but anon, Turkey isn't catholic

>>2014331
i really like this picture

Not much.

The Communist Party of Japan one of the largest and Japanese Leftism got big in the 80's.

>>2014331
actually bolstered it, or at least made nationalists look like edgelords.

Gottah remember the fastest way to galvanise someone as an idea is the martyr them.

>>2014323

They were thinking that Britain wouldn't actually fight over some rocks in the middle of the South Atlantic.

>>2014333
>anglos
>not willing to kill for little or no reason

>>2014323
Galtieri thought he would get support from the USA (which clearly shows how ignorant the military joint was). They were trying to regain somehow the support from the poblation, which was almost gone, since the reclaiming of Islas Malvinas had been an Argentinean cause for a 100 years already. As it turns out it didn't work and after loosing the war they had to bail out of goverment. And also this >>2014333

>>2014308
No.

Your teacher is a moron and should be fired

>>2014308
He probably looked like a Lebanese guy

>>2014308
Carthaginians were Phoenicians

>>2014099
Why does it confuse utilitarism with pragmatism?

>>2014099
so can you be nihilistic but also believe in logical positivism

you believe life has no inherent meaning other than the meaning you give it

>>2014263

Yes. The position is sometimes called "existentialism" but nihilism doesn't reject meaning per se, only the futile quest or objective meaning.