>gave Cortes tons of gold gifts requesting him to leave
>sent sorcerers to defeat the Spanish instead of outright attacking
>invited Cortes to the capital royal palaces along with the empire's enemies who allied with him
>captured Cortes twice and lost him both times because they wanted to sacrifice him in the Main Temple
they fucking deserved it
Bro can you imagine how insanely powerful that sacrifice would have been though
>>2160841
How powerful would it have been?
>>2160835
>captured Cortes twice and lost him both times because they wanted to sacrifice him in the Main Temple
on topic, did they literally only fought for capturing?
Name some battles where the forces of darkness were thrown down.
>>2172650
Germany 1919 when Rosa Luxemburg got killed and the uprising crushed.
The last alliance
>>2172657
lotr fags pls. Tekumel and Hyborian age world are superior.
Which makes more sense? No "both", no "neither", no "other", no copouts of any kind.
It seems like they're trying to address fundamentally different issues.
Rule utilitarianism, obviously.
Fuck you if you think I'm about to type out a justification, though.
>>2172408
The image is actually misleading. Benthamite utilitarianism definitely takes a social-ends perspective and is geared toward social engineering at the macro level.
favorite torture method?
>>2172280
Solitude
>>2172280
The boats.
>>2172283
This. You'd be surprised what the brain can do on its own.
Religious people are inherently idiotic pussies.
You didn't even try with this.
>>2172243
I may not be religious, but I don't need to be to know you're retarded.
>>2172243
I have a degree in religious studies.
All I can say is religious people are just like any other people. They are no different from any ideologue with their own behavioral spectrum
Favorite battles from history thread
Battle of Towton
>Bloodiest battle in English history
>Somewhere in the neighborhood of 60,000 men fighting
>All in the middle of a fucking blizzard
>>2172195
>He doesn't k ow that the Somme was the bloodiest battle in English history
I don't have one really, but I was thinking of one just now where the commander of each army was captured by the other's forces during the course of the battle
>>2172358
I don't think it's what you're talking about but in the Battle of Okinawa both the American and Japanese generals were killed.
What did Wikipedia mean by this?
>>2172096
I think it's true, look at how prominent the fertility female rites were. You even see this in the Americas, there's this ancient desire to depict fertile thicc women. I think the Minoans were even still had some traces of this left in their culture.
Probably commenting on the fact that early societies didn't have the ability to concentrate material possessions to particular individuals, nor were there much occasion for status-institutions, but that this stopped being the case as groups developed, centralized, and the more physically capable, and uninhibited by pregnancy male demographic took and consolidated control.
>>2172096
Have you read a single book on anthropology ever? Even ones published before the "SJW menace" suggest early societies were extremely egalitarian with de facto absolute democracies - the most primitive form of government, as well as rampant polygamy, polyamory, and incest
Historical figures that look like your parents.
>pic related
He always looks pissed off like him too. I got lucky with inheriting my moms nose
When exactly was the term "Cold War" coined?
why do you want to know that haha cheers
Human beings should be valued on the quality of their labor and contributions to society and only those things. Race, gender and background are all trivia and non-important. Prove me wrong.
>>2171561
How do you quantify their quality of their labor and contributions to society? The amount of money in their bank account?
>>2171561
How can we prove you wrong when all you've done is vomit your unjustified opinion.
What's your theory of why those things should be valued, or of how things derive value at all?
>>2171570
>>2171576
I don't hear any counter arguments for how people should be valued.
How do we deal with the paradox of tolerance?
>>2171366
What is the paradox? Tolerating intolerant stuff? Easy, stopping being tolerant, that is, a disgusting cuck
>>2171366
Easy, just tolerate everyone with the exception of those who are intolerant. Tolerance isn't an absolute.
>>2171392
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
Outside of the Egyptians themselves.
>Lack of evidence showing foreign movement changed the racial character majorly from the Old Kingdom on
>Copts are shown to be close to if not the same as Arabian populations.
Niggers and Stormweenies BTFO.
Egypt is greek clay mehmet. Greeks were black. Therefore egypt is african clay. Checkem
>>2171319
>American education
>>2171319
It seems to be the prevailing thought that the Dems and Reps switched platforms in the 60's during the civil rights movement but to me it seems like the only thing that changed about the parties was the demographics that voted for them. The Reps have always been about smaller government since Jefferson and their opposition to the civil rights act can be seen as an attempt to limit national power. Democrats have always been about consolidating national power as seen with Roosevelt and the New York Democrats of the 1800's.
Am I wrong? Did the party platforms actually change?
To add on to this, I always hear people say "the reps were against slavery but also against the civil rights act so they changed."
>>2171126
Democrats used to the "state's rights party" then it became the "federal government party".
The other Roosevelt was also pretty handsy on the economy and he was a Republican, Carter was pretty hands-offy and he was a Democrat - sometimes it's more about the guy than the party, but if the guy is popular you can expect party doctrine to follow after him thereafter.
>>2171126
>The Reps have always been about smaller government since Jefferson
The Republican Party as an institution traces its roots to Lincoln, trying to connect it all the way back to Jefferson is disingenuous. Basically a form of WEWUZism.
You're also cherrypicking like mad considering how many "big government" Republicans and "small government" Democrats there have been (if such labels are actually worth anything).
Why is it that the Italian army seemed to go from stalemating the Austro-Hungarian Army at best to absolutely crushing them the minute this guy took command?
Was Cadorna really that bad, or was that just a meme and there was something bigger going on?
>>2171096
Cadorna was pretty bad, but his ideas weren't that off the norm of the time. The real problem was that he refused to adapt after being faced with proofs of how woefully inadequate prewar military doctrine was. Diaz on the other hand had every reason to change direction, from sheer practicality to political advantage.
Also to be perfectly fair, the maneuver that started the austrian collapse was started by a disobedient general a week before Cadorna got sacked, so in a way it wasn't really just about Cadorna and Diaz.
Not to mention that Italy's bad performance in ww1 is absolutely overstated. We're talking of two more or less equally matched armies, trying to dislodge each other from extremely entrenched positions up and down the fucking Alps. The fact that italian assaults often resulted in stalemates rather than routes is really fucking remarkable (or really fucking bad austrian performance).
>>2171469
>the maneuver that started the austrian collapse was started by a disobedient general a week before Cadorna got sacked
who?
>>2171469
>11 battles of the Isonzo
>Caporetto
Come on, even Robert Nivelle probably could've done better.
I watched Varg's paganism playlist on YouTube and have been considering reading his book on the same subject.
But one thing is bothering me, his claims are extremely heterodox compared to what's commonly excepted as common knowledge regarding Norse religion, and as far as I can tell he hasn't sited any sources for his claims.
Is anyone here educated on the subject?
>>2170887
He thinks he's an orc from the lord of the rings.
>>2170887
Neopaganism itself is heretical. Its people grasping at straws trying to make religion out stories.
>>2170887
His views on paganism are restorationism.
A lot of information regarding paganism has been lost due to christian conquest.