Do we have free will?
>>2172232
Free will is a myth. The only things free are the monies i get from da government every month
>>2172232
You have no control of your subconscious thoughts and actions, but you do make decisions in your conscious mind.
What's his political alignment?
Libertarian.
He describes himself as a "freedom fanatic" in one podcast.
he is a centrist libertarian but probably leans a little to the green side.
>>2172214
libertarian
What the fuck was his problem?
>>2172047
Nose too big?
>>2172047
I bet he would've liked reddit a lot
>>2172047
He was THE hipster of his age.
Was he right about WW2?
>>2171898
No, Zinn just never noticed when the 1960's ended. Him and Noam Chomsky maintained the same incorrect views decades after they had been refuted by the rest of academia.
>>2171898
Well what did he say about WW2?
>>2171898
Never trust anyone who can't admit when he was wrong. Like Chimpsky, Zinn never repudiated any of the so-called "socialist" tyrants he championed at various times, he went to his grave denying the Cambodian genocide and refusing to criticise Pol Pot.
Why do we have fear? Is it not better to stand and fight against a lion rather than run away? Why do we still have fear when we control weather or not the lion goes extinct and we instead fear non-threatening things such as test and what not, at the end of the day we will always survive. Why has fear not become obsolete?
>>2171895
>Is it not better to stand and fight against a lion rather than run away?
Go fight a lion and tell us how it works out.
>yeah but we have guns and shit now
For like 800 years. Evolution doesn't work that fast.
>>2171895
Cos people who ran away from lions didn't get eaten and lived to pass on their genes ya dingus
It's not better to stand and fight if running gives you a better chance of surviving
>>2171895
Perhaps the whole process of overcoming one's fear and building up courage results in strong men. In turn, these men who developed strength of character were the ones to pass on their genes.
In nature, probably both the completely fearless and the cowardly perished, giving place to the ones who could most reasonably calculate risk vs reward in order to survive.
How the fuck were they carried out? How were they commanded? Was it simply the General who commanded the battle? If so, how did he communicate his orders? And in general, how did formations of men know what the orders were in the mayhem of a battle? Any information on how battles progressed, how long the average battle was & just general info is appreciated too.
I have complete trouble imagining battles in any way. It's easy to come up with some Hollywood battle from Gladiator but the idea of squads of men marching towards each other with stabby bits of metal seems so foreign. I'm sure even people in the medieval/ancient world who had never witnessed a battle had trouble imagining one also though.
Extra points for historical/contemporary sources too.
>>2171568
Pretty much the same as today, general sends letters to groups, local leaders in the form of officers who distribute orders down the line until you get to squad formations of some sort, thus everyone knows what they need to do
>>2171568
They smashed them together like a autistic kid with two wooden blocks
Well?
Materialistically? No.
Spiritually? Yes.
This is why a materialistic definition of the universe is asinine.
>>2170930
I mean, those workers that reassembled the trolley onto the track and still had it hurtling towards that guy are assholes.
What is the theological out for acts of violence in Buddhism?
>>2170866
It has been argued any act is moral when it comes from an enlightened mind.
futhermore you can make arguments to monism, arguing that killing a group is no more wrong than curing a virus.
Now most Buddhists will object to these but to my knowledge they have been made before
>>2170866
There is none.
If they want to be violent, they'll do it irrespective of what their religion tells them.
That it's necessary. IIRC the rationale in Myanmar is that Muslims will destroy Buddhism if they have the chance and won't leave of their own accord so violence against them before they can enforce their will is essentially pre-emptive self defense.
Favorite historical music?
Personally, i'm a fan of Napoleonic and American Civil War Music
Suggestions
>The Girl I Left Behind Me
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hpG05rLKS_I
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oblF9EqE9RA
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GGgh6tC6Guo
-Wayward Boy (Same tune)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PLg_W86ta5c
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7wH5-Lx5-qw
>Men of Harlech
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1csr0dxalpI
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DRtnWVvDX6k
>Confederate
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=evcQPbbtZPU
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LArGlfEVYqM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IUjLE_N1Cuc
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-ot7amDyqbY
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0C6MgFHJIDU
>Union
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQ-Rhuc7PyU
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bSSn3NddwFQ
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IIHrjsy4nNs
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IzRhFH5OyHo
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d9uarq2_hQ8
>Both/Misc./Contemporary/Got Bored Sorting
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2kZASM8OX7s
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5i1s8FKoku8
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mllAnPKS6Zs
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q4egb2gpIg4
>Union Civil War Music
>not the most kino one
bruh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJuWszf4g_s
Also a fan of the marches:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4_n1mH83VA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMboh9eFGIU
>>2170860
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdA4NlJiikM
>>2170860
>Napoleonic music
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GmnS5xFxa4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IW4bqGcGWhA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gC_152tUQo
What can we do to put an end to the senseless usage of Common Era in contemporary academic works?
Who gives a shit
AD is a myth. We call it the common era because we can all be traced back to a commen ancestor who lived in antioch 2000 years ago.
>>2170585
many people
did you even want this answered?
I downloaded a bunch of PDFs of mythologies. I already finished the Japanese and Norse ones. Tell me which I should read next of the following choices:
>Arab (unsure if this includes Islam)
>Celtic
>Greco-Roman
>Egyptian
>Hindu
>Inca
>Native American (USA ones only, no Aztecs or Mayans)
>Polynesian
Bhagavad Gita
>>2170475
Greco-Roman, it's not the most interesting but it is prevalent in modern literature and film and is important to understand
>>2170475
Share with us the files anon, let us read with you.
What is the history of feeding pigs oats? And has there ever been long periods where they couldn't be fed?
Oats, or any grain, can be soaked in water for a couple days. Longer, and they will ferment. Given a choice between dry feed and wet ferment grain/hay, any farm animal from ducks to hogs to cows will choose the fermented. After a while, you get used to the smell. It's sort of a beer tang, well, just walk by a brewery and you'll smell it. Hogs love that shit
Oats are still the grain of choice for feeding where I live. And pigs can eat fucking anything so you can just let them out in the woods.
>>2170463
Jesus christ, those are some fat pigs
Why did Britain follow Churchill instead of Mosley?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwZCinIrM0s
>>2170441
Because Mosley was a crank who went around giving speeches to drunken louts in pubs.
>>2170441
Why would most of them follow a fascist?
>>2170480
Why would they follow a Zionist?
Who was the real hero of the Romance of 3 Kingdoms ?
Caocao was ambitious and ruthless leader but was most likely convinced he was doing it for the greater good. He believed in order and the rule of law, he wanted to fight the chaos bring by the fall of Han's influence. Sure he did some awful stuff and lost many battles but he managed to unite half of China under the Wei banner bring order and peace in many of those regions while Wu and Shu completly failed on that point.
Liu Bei believed only virtue could save China. He managed to gather the most incredible leaders of the time but indecisions and kindness threw him in a almost constant state of war, bringing ruin to the regions who welcomed him. Even Shu fell in the end. If you think about it, it's mostly because of Liu Bei existence the wars took so long to resolve.
The Sun family was also full of heroes who failed to save Han and then decide to only promote their own state of Wu. They were loyal to their people until the end but even Sun Quan failed to understand it was the fate of all China and not just Wu who was at stake.
The sun family was inbred as fuck and sun quan was the worst of the lot for exiling his extremely talented prime minister. Liu Bei abandoned his family on no less than 3 occasions running from battles. Cao Cao deserved to rule.
>>2170196
>Liu Bei abandoned his family
That was in fashion for heroes of that time, you forget your family to focus on your quest
>Running from battles
You mean the thing Caocao elevated to an art ?
>>2170196
Cao Cao by far in real history
In the stories its Zhuge Liang, since ya know he wrote the stories and all
I don't get the Arab (Muslim) expansions of the mid 7th century, under the Rashiduns.
What exactly was the point of the conquests? Was it really to "spread Islam", even though Islam wasn't particularly imposed in the territories that were conquered and it took centuries for the regions to turn to Islam?
They couldn't have been wars of retaliation, since neither the Sassanids or Eastern Romans had any real presence in inner Arabia. Was it really just the most basic thing: individuals with inflated egos with a united force at their disposal (that they had never possessed before) attempting to carve out their little Empire, then retroactively claiming this was done in the name of a religion?
>>2170020
>individuals with inflated egos with a united force at their disposal (that they had never possessed before) attempting to carve out their little Empire, then retroactively claiming this was done in the name of a religion?
yes
Islam would have never gone anywhere if it hadn't been spread by the sword
>>2170020
Getting money and power, like every other empire fucking ever. Your attempts to belittle them as if the spread of the Arab Empire was any pettier than any other territorial expansion is retarded.
>>2170038
To be fair, for all we know, it could have alternatively spread in a manner similar to Christianity. Certainly would have been slower growth though compared to how it actually happened.