Why do all Slavs hate each other so much when for most of history they were hated by all other europeans and considered savage and inferior?
>>2286547
West Slavs don't hate each other AFAIK.
Because they are petty-minded savage baboons
>>2286547
Because large groups of people with similar languages don't necessarily have the same consciousness. Germanics hated each other also. Pan-X identities are a relatively new thing in history.
Swedes and Danes butchered each other for centuries.
How do we stop them /his/?
>>2286475
>implying that isn't the 90% of the fags on this board
Only difference is they're mongoloidian shiteskin shiksa
Stop being fucking fruitloops, then there's no reason for American style obnoxious atheists to exist
>>2286497
American atheists are retarded but imo it's legitimate push back from the equally retarded American Protestants.
Architecture thread
>>2286452
Come on everybody
Inspire and get inspired!
>>2286452
Childhood is when you idolise the American Revolution. Adulthood is realising the British Empire was more reasonable and in the right over the issue of taxation.
Wasn't the tariff % in the single-digits for most things?
>>2286421
Yep. Better yet, there were just as many loyalists as there were revolutionaries.
Britain was legitimately in the right here.
The Americans came off as entitled whiners, t b h.
>all great leaders of the past were bullies
Napoleon got bullied in military school for his bad Corsican French and for being poor
most of them were resentful betas who got bullied early on in life but managed to grow out of it
/r9k/ could learn something from them
>>2286397
They get into power for a reason.
Can someone redpill me on the Kabbalah?
Genuine diagrams to God? Jewish chakra? Nonsense? Stolen from Egyptians?
Google is a thing, but I've grown so fond of the massive knowledge base of /his/
>knowledge
>/his/
you got me there.
>>2286378
>Nonsense
duh
typical mystic nonsense that people believe in to feel good about themselves
>>2286378
It's a type of Gnosticism and shares many of its ideas. Something that's supposed to be tough only to the very few.
Childhood is when you think it was about slavery
Adulthood is when you think it was more nuanced than that
Patricianhood is when you know it was about slavery
Is there a fourth tier?
>>2286358
It was about money, for both sides.
>>2286394
Money from slaves
>>2286470
Yeah but they wouldn't give a fuck about keeping slaves if it didn't bring them money. So tge root cause is money.
Were court jesters really a thing and were they as annoying as they are often portrayed?
yes, they were even let off the hook for saying unPC things like some comedians today
>>2286321
>he didn't manage to get based Feste as a love interest
>>2286321
>Were court jesters really a thing
Yes.
>and were they as annoying as they are often portrayed?
What do you mean by this?
The jester was a salaried worker of the court whose job was to entertain his master and his guests. How jester entertained people depended both on the jester's abilities and his master's taste. It could have been a nuanced intellectual political satire, but it could have been as well lighting farts.
>In 1921, 1 dollar was worth 4.2 German marks
>By 1923, 1 dollar was worth 4,210,500,000,000 German marks
>walking around germany with a wheelbarrow full of marks
>get mugged
>guy dumps all the cash and runs off with wheelbarrow
>>2286189
>everybody today says politicians should be murdered/punished for how they're fucking up our countries
>hitler actually does it
>he gets called evil
is hypocrisy as essential to humans as air?
>>2286231
Hitler was more about consolidating his power than actually ridding the government of corruption. I mean the first people he targeted were communists and they were political outsiders just like the Nazis, they had virtually no stake in any of the ongoing corruption in the republic yet they suffered the brunt of Hitler's displeasure for years before he moved against the rest of the political class because they were eating up a lot of the spaces in parliament he needed to secure for the Nazis.
How did Asians go from Taoist sage and disciplined well-rounded scholar to the most retarded materialist and superficial dorks going "need money. need 6ft5 bf. need company to be big and sell, sell, sell. ok?"
>>2286131
western culture took over the world
there is no east anymore
They always did.
Mao's Cultural Revolution was just a last nail in the coffin.
>>2286148
Pretty much.
It was so strange going to China and mentioning anything about their past to them.
I might as well have been talking about eskimo's their customs. It seems as far removed from them as that... Which is rather sad, to see how careless you are in regards to your own people's past.
About to begin this. What should I expect?
One chapter into this and the author is already saying that Christianity planted the seeds of the Holocaust. What the fuck.
>>2286559
He's not wrong, you know. Christian consciousness is at the center of anti-Semitism
>>2286567
Really, the Christians killing Jews thing is only as old as the High Middle Ages.
Before that, there's no real evidence of animosity.
Italians are the heirs of the Roman Empire
>>2285941
I agree with this, whoever disagrees beyond this post shall be denounced heavily.
Greece is.
>>2285949
I would say the opposite, even though it's more like the romans stole greek culture but pretty much became greece "culturally talking" heirs
How does one study a military campaign so as to truly understand it?
it depends on what of it you want to tell: there are multiple ways of seeing a military campaign: from technical to emotional categories and so on and each one has its own type of analisy
>>2285942
from the perspective of a general or military strategist and tactician
I really wanna know my shit
>in general i despise hitler but on some things i agree with him
>>2285886
>a high level of discourse is expected
>>2285891
>national
>socialism
Somehow you managed to be so retarded socialists hate you and nationalists hate you. Face it, your ideology is Fascism -philosophy + salt from world wars.
Does the Soul exist? It seems reasonable to conclude that it does since it is an impossibility for conscious thought to be derived from inanimate matter
>It seems reasonable to conclude that it does since it is an impossibility for conscious thought to be derived from inanimate matter
There doesn't seem to be any evidence supporting your claim.
>>2285882
this is strictly philosophy, not history
>>2285894
>asking for objective evidence for a subjective phenomenon
kek.