Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 4082. page

>>59205568
ez
"I am a C I A nigger cattle"

>fast forward one week
>"lol i just le troled u ahahaahah u wasted a week tryin too solve it xDDD"

>>59205568
>i don't into web dev because i only have a home pc, not a server
kek

No they won't.

>>59205501
That's unlikely to happen, they're an American based company.

Wish it would though.

Wait wtf does Sony have to do with this??!?!?

C U C K
U
C
K

>>59205404
explain

File: ASUS-GTX-1080-Ti-TURBO-STRIX.jpg (89KB, 1200x628px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1200x628px

>>59205393
why would you?

MSI and Asus already introduced their 1080 TIs.
You'll have plenty of cards to chose from by mid april.

>>59205391
ubuntu mate xfce

Arch

>>59205391
Manjaro

>>59205360
And what's the value of the same CPU in 18 years? And what was the value of the Camry back in '99?
No reason to compare them. Both have very different uses. Also you may triple that Camry's price because you will definitely run in some extra costs.

>>59205387
>And what's the value of the same CPU in 18 years?
Pretty much worthless. The value of a fast Pentium 3 processor today.

>And what was the value of the Camry back in '99?

MSRP $22,748. So the Camry has about 3% of the original value left.

But that's not a fair comparison because the Camry can still do the exact same job it did 18 years ago. It's 90% as good of a vehicle as those being made today (the 10% being safety and fuel economy improvements, assuming the Camry is still running properly).

A Pentium 3 from the same era can't do the same things a new CPU can do. You can get by with one for a few basic tasks, but it compares very poorly to the Camry in regards to practical longevity. Especially when you consider that the Camry can theoretically still be relevant even another 10 years from now.

I can guarantee there's some dealbreaker issue with that car, a 2000 camry runs for around $2-3k here.

File: opera_2017-03-02_16-16-01.png (84KB, 644x592px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 644x592px

But what does it mean

>>59205327
When you visit websites, your browser shares this information with them. If your footprint is extremely unique, sites can easily identify and track you- even if your cookies are disabled. The more common your browser and settings are amongst the masses, the less unique your footprint is, therefore making it harder for sites like google/amazon/etc to track you. There's a little more to it than that, because if you have certain settings enabled that identifies you, i.e. geolocation/user agent/etc. the whole point is moot.

The whole point is not standing out.

>>59205247
This is exactly why the Pale Meme will never work for privacy.

https://rms.sexy/

File: stallman final beta 1r3.png (1MB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1366x768px

Oc

640x480? 355fps? this is hilarious!

File: lolfuckingl.png (74KB, 601x830px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 601x830px

>>59205179
>AMD sucks?

Yes

4 GHz vs 5 GHz
8 core vs 4 core

uh.... wut.

No. XFCE is better

>still relying on X.org

>>59205150
Why? I mean, I do like it, but - although it is highly configurable - using XFCE always feels a bit old fashioned,

A computer

The most recent Xiaomi Apple TV clone

>>59205133
>pay2stream

nice bait

>>59205126
Yes a 7700k is a much better choice in like 99% of situations

it's a halo product meant to drive people into paying $300 for the 1700, once they fall off AMD will drop the r5 products and r3 products.

>>59205126
>Also in this case why buy anything higher than the r7 1700 since they all oc just as high as each other?
I believe only X sku have XFR and others need to be overclocked manually. Strange that 1700, 1700x and 1800x were binned the same

>>59205100
it won't be long before optical discs aren't common. it'll be a very long time before they're completely gone.

The last factory making floppy disks shut down just last year.

>>59206270
Seems like Physical media would be dead by now. I don't know anyone who buys DVDs, and Blu-ray didn't have a chance.

>>59208142
My parents literally go to a bricks-and-mortar rental place and bring home DVDs every week. There's still a big market for that shit, you just aren't in it.

>>59204857
Multi-Aircraft Control System (MACS) Software
U.S. Government Purpose Release

Thanks for nothing. :^^^)

Who fucking cares.

>>59204857
>0 results found for amiga.
not even any of their control software from the 90's? fuck that

Why have a home lab when I get to play with 5 fully loaded UCS chassis at work?

>>59204675
Wow, you must be fin-nish. I'm glad you were able to fin-ish this project. Wow you really let it sink in.

>>59204706
Stable temps are no laughing matter, anon.

CAN I GET SOME ARMA 3 BENCHMARKS THAT ARENT THAT ONE POLISH WEBSITE.

Intel shills

why is the 7700 at 5ghz