Who /only linux/
Been using Ubuntu for quite a while on my desktop PC.
Android phone because its obviously superior.
>tfw still using windows 10 on my laptop.
Thinking about installing ubuntu mate 16.04 LTS on my laptop and ridding myself of the botnet forever. Thoughts /g/? Have any of you left windows behind completely?
>>59203190
I left it behind around 9-10 years ago. I use Debian on my main desktop and servers, and an assortment of other distros on refurbished laptops.
No Windows installation since 2008.
>>59203190
>using anything but macos on a laptop
stupid questions thread
is the 7700k compatible with the asus maximus viii hero?
you should try to find a H270 instead of a H170
How can I install Debian ARM ports? I'm too dense to understand if they are only a few packages and I should burn the iso, or I have to do something specific. Thanks anons.
>>59203244
yeah I'll just get the 6700k because I already own the mobo
Why can't AMD create efficient chips
>>59202615
ryzen runs cooler than intel counterparts tho
>>59202615
They can. Ryzen uses a lot less power than Intel's octa cores.
Ryzen is significantly more power efficient than Intel's chips.
This is one of the things that AMD actually scored a big win on.
But intel shills don't want to let you know that
>the city of 10 core $1700 Intel
>>59202597
Yeah, but muh video games.
yeah but mu CSGO at 768p
>>59202597
Wprime isn't indicative but winrar single could improve.
Is linux kernel 4.10.1 botnet?
>>59202593
No, it's the "Give back to the community" ideology that makes the GNU license so useful.
>>59203003
Enjoy your Google fs.
>>59203003
Hello google, 4.9 is the last unpozzed kernel.
>fall for the STEM meme and get job doing data science
>make 50k a year
>girlfriend has some cushy federal government job where she gets every other friday off and makes almost 6 figures
YOU ALL LIED TO EM
>>59202349
Just marry her and then divorce for alimony.
>>59202349
>complaining about entry level salary
>>59202366
I HAVE A MASTER'S DEGREE IN STATISTICS
Guys, can anyone please redpill me, how much does hyperthreading "compensate" for the fact that those additional cores aren't real?
I just did test encode with Handbrake (default preset, PC configs fairly the same aside from CPU), and this what I've got:
i3-3240 (3,4 Ghz, 2 cores, 4 threads) encoded in 07:59
a6-3650 (2,6 Ghz, 4 cores, 4 threads) encoded in 12:07
So, how can i3 with, albeit higher frequency, but "false" 4 cores so easily beat a6, which has 4 real cores?
I am also interested therefore dump.
>>59202316
Because AMD's cores aren't always full cores. Just google "AMD not real cores" and you will find articles about how they have basically been cheating on the core count for the last few gens.
>>59202502
An OP can't bump a thread for 30 min just so you know.
>>59202551
Thanks for answer.
>Mfw the 7700k is the same price as the poozen 1700 (where I live)
>Mfw i pre-ordered the 1700 and my local computer store let me change it to a 7700k
>feelsgudman
Burn in hell for this shit AMD I'll enjoy muh IPC
>>59202245
Your GTX 660 won't be bottlenecked at all now. Good job.
>>59202245
Nice, Intel always wins baby.
>>59202966
>3 posts
>2 IPs
>one was me
Sorry about your thread, man. :^(
Is it possible to generate a recursive tripcode (one whose password is the same as the code itself)? How would you do it if possible?
>>59202194
It has to be max the length of a tripcode.
So you can start bruteforcing tripcodes up to the max tripcode length until you find a fixed point. If you don't find one then it's impossible.
>>59202351
Actually I'm dumb it has to be exactly the size of a tripcode.
It depends on how the algorithm produces unsecured tripcodes, probably? I'm not sure if it's freely available or at least easy to find.
This thread is about the appreciation of watches, as well as the micro-engineering and autism that are required to make a fine watch.
>Required Viewing For Newbies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iViv7gLEueQ
>Strap Guide:
http://pastebin.com/SwRysprE
Previous thread:
>>59186847
>>59202177
I didn't ask for this shit
>>59202256
Good, then fuck off
>REMINDER PLASTICKY CASIOS ARE THE MOST REDDIT-TIER WATCHES EVER
>identical to iPhone 7
>headphone jack
>tee hee
what is it
>>59202091
Huawei P10
>>59202122
You know what I don't understand? Why don't they position the 2 rear cameras so that you can shoot VR/3D scenes/photos with it?
Is a Lenovo 110-15ISK Laptop any good? All I need it for is light programming and some music production (mostly FL studio). I haven't heard anything about it wanted to know if you fags knew if there was anything really shitty about it.
>music production
>FL studio
It has a good cpu so it is a good laptop for music production and the 1TB drive is more than enough.
>>59202049
I literally just bought this laptop two days ago for $280 new. I am extremely happy with it so far, let me know if you have any specific questions.
>>59202049
Get a W520 instead.
>AMD has processors with good performance/price ratio but that are a bit slower than the top intel models which are very expensive and hardly anyway will buy anyway.
>The difference between the intel's top models and the AMD
>"lol Are you a poorfag? You need more than what AMD offers. Intel has the bet top processor therefore you should buy intel even if you ain't gonna buy their top models".
>AMD launches Ryzen.
>Top end models beats intel in most tasks while being cheaper.
>More computational power while being a better offer than what intel used to have.
>"lol you don't need more than what intel offers."
>"My crystal ball tells me that programs or games will never use more than 4 cores. Settle for a 4 core cpu."
>"The proof is this specific kind of task (games not prepared to use more than 4 threads for example). Therefore multithreading is a meme."
>"AMD has been hyping their expensive processors that are not that good in games anyway."
>"Buy instead a pentium processor, it performs the same as the expensive Ryzen anyway."
- How does this logic works?.
- Now Intel users hates AMD users because they're richfags?.
- This people basically accepted in those threads that they hyped and recommended Intel's expensive core i7/i5 processors as an argument to not buy amd when a pentium is more than enough for the tasks "that matters" anyway making moot their own initial point?
- Are this people not even aware of the efforts to implement better multithreading in different tasks including videogames?.
How many of you have noticed all this fallacies and backpedalling coming from these people? are we being telemarketed?
>>59201960
Also
>AMD has processors with noticiabily worse energy efficience but not necessarily bad for the average user.
>"Buy intel, energy efficiency matters. Do you want a housefire? enjoy"
>AMD launches Ryzen.
>Better energy efficience than intel.
>"Buy a core i7, what it matters is clock frecuencies and a bit more FPS in games".
>Energy efficiency now even mentioned in the threads.
So, since when energy efficiency doesn't matter anymore? Is this the pentium 4 era again when people used to think clock frecuencies is a way to compare performance?
>AMD breaks overclocking records.
>"Ryzen is terrible on overclocking."
>It's not mentioned that overclocking 8 threads is not the same as overclocking 4 threads.
>It's not mentioned you can disable cores and overclock only 4 cores.
Are this people forgotting this "details" by mistake? or it's on purpose?.
>>59201972
Also
>"Look, AMD make this honest mistakes that can be fixed (for example the failed overclock on live or the EFI issues). Ryzen is DOA!."
>Meanwhile they're defending a company (Intel) that has screwed their users over the years, for example milking them with a lot of different incompatible sockets and setting unrealistic prices.
>Meanwhile this people forget that Inteld has been found guilty on using anti competitive tactics like bribing laptop and pc makers, manipulating opinions on social media (by social media i mean any public place where people can chat, including 4chan) with astroturfing tactics, bribing reviewers (see the recent leak), looking at ways to cripple competitiors instead of making better products.
>Meanwhile this people defend a company that clearly just invest the minimum on innovation and that can survive a long time losing money if they want until competitors cannot work anymore.
This people don't grasp the bubble they're creating by thrashtalking and trying to deter people from buying AMD. They'll get cheaper processors from Intel now and if AMD dissapears the prices will rise to the moon.
In what way is this people bennefited by rewarding this kind of behavior from intel? In what way is this people bennefited with a monopoly? Are they people paid by people who invested in Intel to avoid losing as much money as possible?
Intelfags are now "taking revenge" on AMDfag shitposting. As with all ___fag wars, it's just identity politics.
All I can say is that at least there's reason to believe part of it is actual shilling, instead of a waifu war where the delusions and fandom wars have become personal insults.
There might be BIOS issues, software issues. AMD is probably gonna lose the gamer market unless the r5 are fucking dirt cheap.
Just hang tight.
I wonder who started these
>>59201945
A Jew.
>>59201964
Axis cultists
One day I'll figure out how to get mpv to include subs
There's AMA going on at /r/AMD
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5x4hxu/we_are_amd_creators_of_athlon_radeon_and_other/
want to ask something there?
>inb4 fuck off to /reddit/
>>59201837
>>59201837
ask them why redditurds cant stay in their safe space and come here to whine and complain about everything including reddit itself
Fake News