Archived threads in /fa/ - Fashion - 2740. page

File: Chelsea boots.jpg (192KB, 1195x1600px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1195x1600px

What do you think? I am not sure I am able to pull it off, but I fucking love the aesthetics of Chelsea's Boots.

I you need more pictures for a better evaluation, tell me

File: image1xxl.jpg (148KB, 870x1110px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 870x1110px

are dr. denim jeans better in quality than cheap mondays?

>>9203808
i have a pair of each, i wouldn't say it's higher quality but I'd say the fit is slightly skinnier on the dr. denims.

File: dick tightpants.jpg (79KB, 558x960px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 558x960px

I posted this in the DIY general but that seems to be all about dying flecktarn jackets so I'll put it here too:

I'm trying to sew on a patch to a jacket. Is there some basic how to wiki/video out there that tells you how to do it? The few I looked at were blurry as fuck youtube monstrosities featuring girl scouts and Texas mothers.

I don't have a sewing machine so it'll be by hand. Also I was hoping to sew it as a single line of stitches as opposed to a zig-zag pattern, hopefully you get what I'm talking about. Thanks.

File: Screenshot_2014-12-07-20-50-24.png (563KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 540x960px

Self bump

>>9212252
dope, thanks for sharing
add more stores and you'll be da real mvp

>>9212252
noic
and yh if you can, add more stores

>>9212252
S T I C K Y
T
I
C
K
Y

>>9209069
word

>>9209069
*tips fedora*

you sound like me when i was a high school 'punk'

>>9209078
I'm not "punk" at all. Valuing brand name clothing just because it's brand name and devaluing non-brand-name clothing just because it isn't brand name is absolutely retarded. You're attaching asthetic value to a name that does nothing but add itself and extra 0's to the price tag.

>>9207479
Acne Overcoat in Navy
Tom Ford suit.

That's about my budget

Can I buy shoes?

>>9207487
yeah

>>9201176
lol no

none of these are really what i would call "pieces" as they're all basics. that doesn't mean that they're bad. in fact, assuming everything fits decently well, you have now achieved what is variously called basic bitch core, casualcore, etc.

this is a solid foundation of basic clothes. if you make outfits with these clothes, all of your friends will think that you're dressing better. you'll be able to function more confidently in everyday life, and you'll eventually forget about clothes and stop worrying and just instinctively buy versatile, well-fitting, boring clothes. if you are attempting to improve your clothes as a means of social lubrication, you have gone as far as you can or should go.

however, if you start thinking about garments as textile art and if you start following and becoming interested in designers as artists and start 'copping pieces' and turning your wardrobe into a "highly unique selection of all black rick owens and raf semens" you will finally actually be "dressing for yourself". that being said, artisanal designer clothes are objectively superior in almost every way. however, if you move into this territory, the way you dress will no longer be social lubricant unless you surround yourself with urban artists who regularly sell abstract paintings with actual semen mixed into the paint for ten thousand dollars to yuppies.

what i'm trying to say is, if you just want to fit in and look good by most people's standards, stop where you are. if you crave something more, something that will become a vampire to not only your wallet but also your social life and self image, but you're willing to do it FOR AESTHETICS, then keep lurking.

>>9206969
Second this.

>>9206969

I'm not looking to go all black and experiment with silhouettes as much as /fa/ does, however I want to go for something a little more interesting.

I was thinking relatively classic, heritage basics. Including a lot of good quality knitwear, I'd like to keep to a relatively dark/monochrome theme (maybe with some inclusion of navy, brown, light blue - I think the colour spectrum APC uses throughout the seasons is simple, but not bright, i like that.)
thanks for the advice

>>9210767
>play converse

i dunno dude, i dunno

File: 1416297155634.jpg (68KB, 730x400px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 730x400px

>>9210771

kek just ignore those thx

>>9202893
>>9202903
>girls inspo
>girls
Neither of them really look like girls. Wtf dude?

File: 0006JiaWT14bwp.jpg (214KB, 486x730px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 486x730px

>>9202911
you're to stuck at conventions

File: image.jpg (172KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 960x640px

They're in Ohio right now, I'm stoked

All of you are beret wearing pinheads. People from 1926 have better fashion that you!

File: kram.jpg (3MB, 4548x2696px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4548x2696px

>>9203210
cant beat the 20s

>>9203203
loadsa kapital and things I wont wear

>>9205035
dislike the ultra,

but the xperia z3 is def the most luxurious phone on the market in the US

too bad it costs 2X the iphone 5s and costs twice as much as the samsung gs5 with the same specs

and it's not sold in walmart/target/best buy with the "free" financing deals and shit

so most people can't afford them

like if you want this shit you have to have the $950 cash on you now

with that said i have the z3 in white as a personal phone and the samsung s5 as the beater phone on prepaid

>>9205035
i had/have an xperia u and its fucking wank

>>9205042
wow, you guys don't get the z series on contract in burgerland?

File: D.GNAK-by-KANG.D-2013-Autumn-Winter-Collection-16.jpg (56KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 640x960px

d.gnak by kang d A/W 2013

why do you wear shoes to bed?

File: 1384701685776.gif (983KB, 500x376px) Image search: [Google]

983KB, 500x376px

Daphne is my modelfu

File: _WWbU-tXX_A.jpg (97KB, 700x491px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 700x491px

>>9202083
Kinda looks like my exgf, too bad her behavior was so cuntish

File: 1417519326001.jpg (170KB, 1920x2379px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1920x2379px

dunno who she is, but wow