post you are tumblr
>>9274991
>2 days until 2015
>tumblr
http://unintellectually-challenged.tumblr.com/
>>9274996
best thing you've posted tbh
Old was full
W2c black Chelsea boots?
Bump for interest.
Looked pretty hard for some in the last flew days, but the only brands that have the aesthetic I'm looking for are Gucci and Prada, or suitably expensive and extravagant
W2C qasa racer?
>>9274590
What dumb ass question
Just kill urself my man
u should leave this board if
-u like any of the following brands
>slp
>odeur, all saings, ovate, any other knockoff brands
>apc, acne, geller, ervell, norse projects, any other "minimalist" garbage
>hypebeast shit
-u want to dress like:
>kanye west
>harry styles
>death grips
>yung lean
>ryan gosling
>zomby
>that other shitty producer that samefags on here all the time
-ur a:
>sjw
>bug chaser
>fatass
>jew
-u post in tumblr threads
-u follow or care about trends trends either on or off the internet
-u categorize urself as x-core or use the words core or wave at all
only after the garbage is purged will /fa/ be a good board again
>>9274052
What a great thread.
>>9274052
Yawn
>>9274052
Phew!
Luckily I exclusively dress in work-wear.
So I love the design and look of the flyknit trainers in black and white but since they are discontinued, they are quite unobtainable for me. Street value is at $400+.
Anyways I found replicas and was wondering what you guys think.
The replicas are on the bottom row.
>>9270430
They look pretty good, from what I can see. Do you have a link, mate?
Bieber is now a fuccboi. In a couple months he will be memechrome.
/fa/'s current aesthetic is doomed.
>>9272697
That is memechrome you dingus
You seem like the fuccboi here to be honest
>>9272697
/fa/ doesnt have an aesthetic
W2C: old one is at 300
Where to cop these glasses?
does anybody know the model name of these nike shoes?
>>9271188
I normally don't like nike but those are p dope
going to live in Munich starting in July, will bring barely any clothes.
w2c for reasonable prices and passable quality?
Favorite designers
favoritw pieces
worst designers
worst pieces
what you're gonna cop etc.
Gonna cop, only $80 & good looking / fit too
>>9272605
fuck off yesstyle shill
>>9272612
It's from aliexpress retard
I have had a interest in tech focused fashion for quite some time now, begining to build up a wardrobe but struggling to find good pieces at decent prices...Could anyone help me out? Also general tech wear thread
>>9271446
You're never going to build a "tech focused fashion" wardrobe at decent prices. You'll get the aesthetic, but if you don't have good money, "tech wear" will be out of your reach.
>Mountain/Hiking stores (you'll also need to get a few pieces tailored, as they'll normally be too baggy for what you want)
I'm a new biker and I'm interested in a tech style 3M reflective jacket (the white kind). Must be water and wind proof.
Yes, I've already googled and gotten some sources, but I'm interested in seeing some good looking higher fashion pieces besides whatever ugly shit Nike is making (maybe from people who've already done the research). Anyway, looking for good recs.
Been wanting to ask forever, but what pants are he wearing. w2c.
Hard mode: no memeochrome
Extra hard mode: nothing posted a hundred times before
>>9272540
>grey t-shirt
Holy SHIT! How do these guys come up with it?
dumping some homies from sufu
Alot of jimmies were rustled in the past hour , and I'm curious (Since everybody here is fashion inclined)
Why is Burberry so frowned upon here ? And what are the preferred brands ? Very curious , thanks .
There are no particular "brands," though most of the people here love to ride Rick Owens and Raf Simons' respective dicks.
>>9270062
just guessing its because some people who arent super into fashion but they have money buy at nordstrom and nordstrom is used by the general population
>muh exclusives
can wear any brand you want, as long as it doesn't look like obvious shit, numbnuts. this idiot still hasn't gotten the point.
post User fits
because every other thread is shit right now
>>9270526
>>9270530
what will be hot, what will be not, and what will peak?
pince-nez and vinyl trousers.
1940 golf clothes.
>>9268638
Wide lapels.
Anyone got some inspo? I want to go for minimal
>>9269345
https://factory.jcrew.com/mens-clothing/sweaters/lambswool/PRD~21943/21943.jsp?N=217+16&Nbrd=F&Nloc=en_US&Nrpp=48&Npge=1&Nsrt=3&isSaleItem=true&color_name=MARLED%20ALMOND&isFromSale=true&isNewSearch=true&hash=row0
cop?
http://www.topman.com/en/tmuk/product/clothing-140502/mens-shirts-140515/grey-drapey-twill-longer-length-long-sleeve-shirt-3429203?bi=1&ps=200
>>9268739
pass
>>9269440
fine for a basic nothing too special
Cop or not?
Never seen or worn a coach jacket can they work? I've been eyeing this one from wtaps as I need a layering jacket. Too fuccboi?
>>9269808
Here is the back.
What's a good source for basics that are NOT made by tiny childrens hands? preferrably in europe, since i live in europe and that stuff tends to be easier to get. NA or japan made would be good, too. i have two ACNE sweats that i really like, really like the thick cotton and general quality, but i really hate that it's made in china. it's just something i want to stay away from in the future, but most recommended basics seem to be made in china, like the wang shit etc.
>>9271465
American Apparel?
>>9271472
OP here, i have some basic tshirts from them and they are pretty good as undershirts. but i'd rather like something in a higher quality, and alot of their stuff isn't 100% cotton
James Perse
Albam (UK)
Sunspel (good quality, though I'm not a fan of their basic tee's cut)
American Apparel, good tee's for the price.